Urban Spatial Risk Assessment of Fire from Fueling Stations on Buildings Case Study: Lubaga Division, Kampala City, Uganda

Ismail Wadembere, Joan Apaco
{"title":"Urban Spatial Risk Assessment of Fire from Fueling Stations on Buildings Case Study: Lubaga Division, Kampala City, Uganda","authors":"Ismail Wadembere, Joan Apaco","doi":"10.4236/jbcpr.2020.81005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The discovery of oil and gas in Uganda has attracted many investors, leading to increase in fuel/gas distributing companies and fueling stations creating rapid demand for land to locate the stations compared to available open urban land. Because of the explosive and combustion characteristics of fuel stored and dispensed at stations, several studies have been conducted on different fires at fueling stations such as static fire, jet fire, vapor cloud explosions, open fires, etc. but there was need to assess spatially the risk of fire from stations, its consequences and sovereignty on buildings surrounding them. This was done basing on seven parameters—proximity of buildings to stations, building materials, distance between buildings, wind speed, temperature, slope and vegetation. Analytical hierarchy process and pairwise comparison were used to weight the parameters based on their relative importance. Weighted sum tool was applied to generate the fire risk maps for the quarters—December to February, March to May, June to August, and September to November from 2008 to 2013. The parameters were overlaid with the buildings in each risk zone for all the four quarters and their influences determined. The highest contributors were proximity of the buildings to stations, building materials and separation between buildings. Most of the affected buildings were made of rusted corrugated iron sheets and wood; the separation distance from one building to another ranged from 0 - 4 m. Most of buildings located within 100 m from stations were at moderate risk level and within 50 m were at highest risk level. The period of December to February and June to August had the highest risk. The findings can be used to guide planners and policy makers on building location vs. material vs. separation. It can also guide developers on where, when and how to carry out their developments.","PeriodicalId":64333,"journal":{"name":"房屋建造与规划研究(英文)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"房屋建造与规划研究(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jbcpr.2020.81005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The discovery of oil and gas in Uganda has attracted many investors, leading to increase in fuel/gas distributing companies and fueling stations creating rapid demand for land to locate the stations compared to available open urban land. Because of the explosive and combustion characteristics of fuel stored and dispensed at stations, several studies have been conducted on different fires at fueling stations such as static fire, jet fire, vapor cloud explosions, open fires, etc. but there was need to assess spatially the risk of fire from stations, its consequences and sovereignty on buildings surrounding them. This was done basing on seven parameters—proximity of buildings to stations, building materials, distance between buildings, wind speed, temperature, slope and vegetation. Analytical hierarchy process and pairwise comparison were used to weight the parameters based on their relative importance. Weighted sum tool was applied to generate the fire risk maps for the quarters—December to February, March to May, June to August, and September to November from 2008 to 2013. The parameters were overlaid with the buildings in each risk zone for all the four quarters and their influences determined. The highest contributors were proximity of the buildings to stations, building materials and separation between buildings. Most of the affected buildings were made of rusted corrugated iron sheets and wood; the separation distance from one building to another ranged from 0 - 4 m. Most of buildings located within 100 m from stations were at moderate risk level and within 50 m were at highest risk level. The period of December to February and June to August had the highest risk. The findings can be used to guide planners and policy makers on building location vs. material vs. separation. It can also guide developers on where, when and how to carry out their developments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加油站对建筑物火灾的城市空间风险评估——案例研究:乌干达坎帕拉市卢巴加区
乌干达石油和天然气的发现吸引了许多投资者,导致燃料/天然气分销公司和加油站的增加,与可用的开放城市土地相比,对选址加油站的土地需求迅速增加。由于加油站储存和分配燃料的爆炸和燃烧特性,对加油站的不同火灾进行了若干研究,如静态火灾、喷射火灾、蒸气云爆炸、明火等,但需要在空间上评估加油站火灾的风险、后果和对周围建筑物的主权。这是根据七个参数完成的——建筑物与车站的距离、建筑材料、建筑物之间的距离、风速、温度、坡度和植被。采用层次分析法和两两比较法对各参数的相对重要性进行加权。采用加权和工具生成2008年至2013年12月至2月、3月至5月、6月至8月和9月至11月四个季度的火灾风险图。将参数与四个季度的每个危险区域的建筑物叠加,并确定其影响。影响最大的因素是建筑物与车站的距离、建筑材料和建筑物之间的距离。大多数受影响的建筑物是由生锈的波纹铁皮和木材建造的;建筑物与建筑物之间的距离为0 - 4米。距离监测站100米以内的建筑物大部分处于中等危险水平,50米以内的建筑物处于最高危险水平。12月至2月和6月至8月的风险最高。研究结果可用于指导规划者和决策者在建筑位置、材料和分离方面的选择。它还可以指导开发人员在何处、何时以及如何进行开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
期刊最新文献
Urban Planning Based on Nature—A Nature-Based Solution Study of Construction Techniques and Hygro-Thermal Behavior of a Vernacular Earth Building in a Humid Tropical Climate Pathfinder-Based Simulation and Optimization of Evacuation of Large Commercial Complexes Enhanced Constructability Using 4D Plus Modelling in Brownfield Sites Research on the Ecological Wisdom of Traditional Dwellings of the Liangshan Yi Nationality Based on Regional Climate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1