Dealing with the Facts of Life: The Management of Intra-Party Factionalism in the Iberian Radical Left Parties

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Government and Opposition Pub Date : 2023-05-10 DOI:10.1017/gov.2023.9
Pedro Lourenço, Tiago Conceição, Carlos Jalali
{"title":"Dealing with the Facts of Life: The Management of Intra-Party Factionalism in the Iberian Radical Left Parties","authors":"Pedro Lourenço, Tiago Conceição, Carlos Jalali","doi":"10.1017/gov.2023.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Factionalism is an important element in parties' internal life, affecting their policies, strategies, electoral performance and even survival. Yet little is known about how parties manage factionalism. This study examines how radical left parties (RLPs) manage factionalism, drawing on a comparative case study of four RLPs – the Spanish Podemos and United Left (IU), and the Portuguese Left Bloc (BE) and Communist Party (PCP) – from 2010 to 2019. Drawing on original data collection, we find that parties adopt both formal and informal mechanisms to address factionalism. However, their approaches differ significantly. We identify two main approaches towards factionalism: a permissive approach, which allows internal pluralism, in the BE and IU; and a prohibitionist approach, which actively fights factionalism, in Podemos and the PCP, with competitive prohibitionism in the former and pre-emptive prohibitionism in the latter. These approaches strongly correlate with parties' origins and political orientation, but neither fully prevents intra-party conflict or splintering.","PeriodicalId":47758,"journal":{"name":"Government and Opposition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government and Opposition","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2023.9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Factionalism is an important element in parties' internal life, affecting their policies, strategies, electoral performance and even survival. Yet little is known about how parties manage factionalism. This study examines how radical left parties (RLPs) manage factionalism, drawing on a comparative case study of four RLPs – the Spanish Podemos and United Left (IU), and the Portuguese Left Bloc (BE) and Communist Party (PCP) – from 2010 to 2019. Drawing on original data collection, we find that parties adopt both formal and informal mechanisms to address factionalism. However, their approaches differ significantly. We identify two main approaches towards factionalism: a permissive approach, which allows internal pluralism, in the BE and IU; and a prohibitionist approach, which actively fights factionalism, in Podemos and the PCP, with competitive prohibitionism in the former and pre-emptive prohibitionism in the latter. These approaches strongly correlate with parties' origins and political orientation, but neither fully prevents intra-party conflict or splintering.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
处理生活事实:伊比利亚激进左翼政党党内派系主义的管理
派系主义是政党内部生活中的一个重要因素,影响着政党的政策、战略、选举表现甚至生存。然而,人们对政党如何处理派系斗争知之甚少。这项研究考察了激进左翼政党(RLP)如何管理派系斗争,借鉴了2010年至2019年对四个RLP——西班牙波德莫斯党和联合左翼党(IU)、葡萄牙左翼集团(BE)和共产党(PCP)——的比较案例研究。根据原始数据收集,我们发现政党采用正式和非正式机制来解决派系斗争。然而,他们的方法有很大不同。我们确定了两种处理派系斗争的主要方法:允许BE和IU内部多元化的宽容方法;以及在波德莫斯和PCP中积极对抗派系斗争的禁止主义方法,前者为竞争性禁止主义,后者为先发制人的禁止主义。这些方法与政党的起源和政治取向密切相关,但都不能完全防止党内冲突或分裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Government and Opposition
Government and Opposition POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Government and Opposition has been a leading international journal of comparative politics for over 40 years. Its distinctive voice amongst politics journals has ensured a large, worldwide circulation. Government and Opposition"s interests include: - developments in the theory and practice of democracy, including significant elections the evolution of political parties, and the consequences of new political challenges for governments and oppositions - the governance of the global economy and the implications of interdependence worldwide politics - including the politics of the European Union - major issues of public policy, especially from a comparative perspective theoretical and ethical dimensions of political issues and policy.
期刊最新文献
Party-System Polarization and Individual Perceptions of Party Differences: Two Divergent Effects on Turnout The Anti-Authoritarian Populisms: Ideologies of Democratic Struggle in Tanzania, Zimbabwe and Worldwide GOV volume 59 issue 1 Cover and Back matter GOV volume 59 issue 1 Cover and Front matter Religious Institutions’ Stances towards Autocratization in the Post-Third Wave Period
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1