IS CONGESTION PRICING AN URBAN MOBILITY SOLUTION TO BRAZILIAN CITIES?

L. Oliveira, Sayonara Lopes Souza, L. Cardoso, José Elievam Bessa Jr, R. Oliveira, Lílian dos Santos Fontes Pereira Bracarense
{"title":"IS CONGESTION PRICING AN URBAN MOBILITY SOLUTION TO BRAZILIAN CITIES?","authors":"L. Oliveira, Sayonara Lopes Souza, L. Cardoso, José Elievam Bessa Jr, R. Oliveira, Lílian dos Santos Fontes Pereira Bracarense","doi":"10.4090/juee.2019.v13n2.302316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The congestion pricing is a measure of travel demand management to discourage car use with low public and political acceptability. In the Brazilian context, the Urban Mobility Policy considers this measure to mitigate the congestion. In this paper, we present an exploratory analysis to identify the characteristics considered important by Brazilian transport experts to the implementation of the congestion pricing. The residents assessed these characteristics to identify the preference and acceptability of this scheme in Belo Horizonte (Brazil). We obtained the data from a Web-based survey from experts and residents. With the results, we simulated scenarios reducing the number of private cars in order to evaluate the real benefits of congestion price in a real network. According to Brazilian transport experts, the congestion pricing can be an efficient and well-accepted demand management measure, if the profit subsidises the public transportation systems (bus and rail) and the infrastructure to non-motorized transportation, with active public participation in the decision-making. Considering the residents’ results, we identified favourable public acceptability considering the benefits of public transport investment from the revenue obtained out of the congestion charges. However, availability for payment has a high rejection rate, although implementation strategies are perceived as advantages. The simulation indicates the reduction of travel time (seconds/km), delay time (seconds/km), queue length (vehicle) and density time (vehicle/km) indicating congestion reduction and, consequently, improving the urban mobility. The contribution of this paper is one methodology considering the Brazilian context to evaluate the congestion-pricing scheme from experts and residents point of view. Also, the results could support the discussion about the implementation of the congestion charging in Brazilian cities.","PeriodicalId":17594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4090/juee.2019.v13n2.302316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The congestion pricing is a measure of travel demand management to discourage car use with low public and political acceptability. In the Brazilian context, the Urban Mobility Policy considers this measure to mitigate the congestion. In this paper, we present an exploratory analysis to identify the characteristics considered important by Brazilian transport experts to the implementation of the congestion pricing. The residents assessed these characteristics to identify the preference and acceptability of this scheme in Belo Horizonte (Brazil). We obtained the data from a Web-based survey from experts and residents. With the results, we simulated scenarios reducing the number of private cars in order to evaluate the real benefits of congestion price in a real network. According to Brazilian transport experts, the congestion pricing can be an efficient and well-accepted demand management measure, if the profit subsidises the public transportation systems (bus and rail) and the infrastructure to non-motorized transportation, with active public participation in the decision-making. Considering the residents’ results, we identified favourable public acceptability considering the benefits of public transport investment from the revenue obtained out of the congestion charges. However, availability for payment has a high rejection rate, although implementation strategies are perceived as advantages. The simulation indicates the reduction of travel time (seconds/km), delay time (seconds/km), queue length (vehicle) and density time (vehicle/km) indicating congestion reduction and, consequently, improving the urban mobility. The contribution of this paper is one methodology considering the Brazilian context to evaluate the congestion-pricing scheme from experts and residents point of view. Also, the results could support the discussion about the implementation of the congestion charging in Brazilian cities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拥堵收费是巴西城市交通的解决方案吗?
拥堵收费是一种出行需求管理措施,旨在阻止公众和政治接受度较低的汽车使用。在巴西,城市交通政策认为这一措施是为了缓解拥堵。在本文中,我们进行了探索性分析,以确定巴西交通专家认为对实施拥堵定价很重要的特征。居民评估了这些特征,以确定贝洛奥里藏特(巴西)对该方案的偏好和可接受性。我们从专家和居民的网络调查中获得了数据。根据结果,我们模拟了减少私家车数量的场景,以评估拥堵价格在真实网络中的实际效益。根据巴西交通专家的说法,如果利润补贴公共交通系统(公共汽车和铁路)和非机动交通的基础设施,并让公众积极参与决策,那么拥堵定价可能是一种有效且广为接受的需求管理措施。考虑到居民的结果,考虑到公共交通投资从拥堵费中获得的收益,我们确定了良好的公众接受度。然而,尽管实施策略被认为是一种优势,但付款的可用性却有很高的拒绝率。模拟表明,出行时间(秒/km)、延误时间(秒/km)、排队长度(车辆)和密度时间(车辆/km)的减少表明拥堵减少,从而提高了城市机动性。本文的贡献是一种考虑巴西背景的方法,从专家和居民的角度评估拥堵定价方案。此外,研究结果可以支持关于在巴西城市实施拥堵收费的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering
Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering (JUEE) provides a forum for original papers and for the exchange of information and views on significant developments in urban and environmental engineering worldwide. The scope of the journal includes: (a) Water Resources and Waste Management [...] (b) Constructions and Environment[...] (c) Urban Design[...] (d) Transportation Engineering[...] The Editors welcome original papers, scientific notes and discussions, in English, in those and related topics. All papers submitted to the Journal are peer reviewed by an international panel of Associate Editors and other experts. Authors are encouraged to suggest potential referees with their submission. Authors will have to confirm that the work, or any part of it, has not been published before and is not presently being considered for publication elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
ENGINEERING GEOLOGICAL TYPIFICATION OF TERRITORIES FOR ALLOCATION OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES (WITH THE EXAMPLE OF CENTRAL RUSSIA) VALORIZATION OF SUGARCANE AND ORANGE BAGASSES IN THE BIOSORPTION PROCESS FOR REMOVAL OF DYE FROM THE SYNTHETIC AQUEOUS SOLUTION BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT CONJUGATED OF LANDFILL LEACHATE AND WASTEWATER URBAN SOLID WASTE TRANSPORTATION, COMPOSTING, RECYCLING, AND LANDFILL ISSUES IN SUBSAHARIAN AFRICA CITIES FAST DISINFECTION OF CONTAMINATED STORMWATER USING PERACETIC ACID
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1