Paul Ricoeur y el problema de la antropología filosófica. El debate con Heidegger por la apropiación de Kant en «El hombre falible»

Tabano Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI:10.46553/TAB.15.2019.P79-94
Tomás Domergue
{"title":"Paul Ricoeur y el problema de la antropología filosófica. El debate con Heidegger por la apropiación de Kant en «El hombre falible»","authors":"Tomás Domergue","doi":"10.46553/TAB.15.2019.P79-94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to demonstrate that, under the transcendental stage of the anthropology of ‘The fallible man’, Ricoeur develops a discussion with the philosophies of finitude, to achieve an original interpretation of Kant, crystallized, in turn, in a debate with Heidegger. To demonstrate this, we will dedicate ourselves, first of all, to develop the main concepts of the transcendental stage of reflection such as the Ricoeur proponents. Then, we will try to see how and to what extent they confront the Heideggerian proposal. With this, we intend to highlight the methodical and thematic differences present in the phenomenological-hermeneutical projects of both philosophers.","PeriodicalId":33854,"journal":{"name":"Tabano","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tabano","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46553/TAB.15.2019.P79-94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article aims to demonstrate that, under the transcendental stage of the anthropology of ‘The fallible man’, Ricoeur develops a discussion with the philosophies of finitude, to achieve an original interpretation of Kant, crystallized, in turn, in a debate with Heidegger. To demonstrate this, we will dedicate ourselves, first of all, to develop the main concepts of the transcendental stage of reflection such as the Ricoeur proponents. Then, we will try to see how and to what extent they confront the Heideggerian proposal. With this, we intend to highlight the methodical and thematic differences present in the phenomenological-hermeneutical projects of both philosophers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保罗·里科与哲学人类学问题。与海德格尔关于康德在《易犯错误的人》中占有的辩论
本文旨在证明,在“易犯错误的人”人类学的先验阶段,Ricoeur展开了与有限性哲学的讨论,以实现对康德的原始解释,进而在与海德格尔的辩论中结晶出来。为了证明这一点,我们将首先致力于发展超越反思阶段的主要概念,如利科的支持者。然后,我们将试图看看他们如何以及在多大程度上对抗海德格尔的建议。有了这一点,我们打算强调两位哲学家在现象学解释学项目中存在的系统性和主题性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sobre el uso y abuso de los conceptos de Deleuze y Guattari en la filosofía de Bernard Stiegler Garabatear más allá del papel. Un análisis fenomenológico del movimiento en la primera infancia “Esto es realmente sólo esto”: Wittgenstein contra la ciencia de la estética como explicación reductiva El olvido del ser humano: la visión husserliana acerca de la crisis del siglo XX Atravesando vida y pensamiento. La teoría de imaginación cíclica de Gilbert Simondon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1