Epistemic Uncertainty Treatment Using Group Method of Data Handling Algorithm in Seismic Collapse Fragility

IF 1.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures Pub Date : 2021-02-08 DOI:10.1590/1679-78256254
Fooad Karimi Ghaleh Jough, Meisam Veghar, S. Beheshti-Aval
{"title":"Epistemic Uncertainty Treatment Using Group Method of Data Handling Algorithm in Seismic Collapse Fragility","authors":"Fooad Karimi Ghaleh Jough, Meisam Veghar, S. Beheshti-Aval","doi":"10.1590/1679-78256254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DEVELOPING FRAGILITY FUNCTIONS IS THE ESSENTIAL STEP IN INCORPORATING IMPORTANT UNCERTAINTIES IN NEXT-GENERATION PERFORMANCE-BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING (PBEE) METHODOLOGY. THE PRESENT PAPER IS AIMED TO INVOLVE RECORD-TO-RECORD VARIABILITY AS WELL AS MODELLING UNCERTAINTY SOURCES IN DEVELOPING THE FRAGILITY CURVES AT COLLAPSE LIMIT STATE. IN THIS ARTICLE, IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE DISPERSION OF UNCERTAINTIES, GROUP METHOD OF DATA HANDLING (GMDH) IN COMBINATION WITH MONTE CARLO SIMULATION (MCS) USED TO DEVELOP STRUCTURAL COLLAPSE FRAGILITY CURVE, CONSIDERING EFFECTS OF EPISTEMIC AND ALEATORY UNCERTAINTIES. A STEEL MOMENT RESISTING FRAME (SMRF) IS CHOSEN AS THE TESTED STRUCTURE.N THE FRAGILITY CURVES OBTAINED BY THE PROPOSED METHOD WHICH IS BELONG TO GMDH APPROACHES ARE COMPARED WITH THOSE RESULTED FROM SIMPLE AND WELL-KNOWN AVAILABLE METHODS SUCH AS FIRST-ORDER SECOND-MOMENT (FOSM), APPROXIMATE SECOND-ORDER SECOND-MOMENT (ASOSM) AND MONTE CARLO (MC)/RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD (RSM), SOMEHOW, AS AN ACCURATE METHOD. THE RESULTS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE PROPOSED APPROACH INDICATE INCREASING ACCURACY AND PRECISION OF THE OUTPUTS AS WELL AS POWER WITH THE SAME COMPUTATIONAL TIME COMPARED TO AFOREMENTIONED METHODS. THE GMDH METHOD INTRODUCED HERE CAN BE APPLIED TO THE OTHER PERFORMANCE LEVELS.","PeriodicalId":18192,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78256254","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

DEVELOPING FRAGILITY FUNCTIONS IS THE ESSENTIAL STEP IN INCORPORATING IMPORTANT UNCERTAINTIES IN NEXT-GENERATION PERFORMANCE-BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING (PBEE) METHODOLOGY. THE PRESENT PAPER IS AIMED TO INVOLVE RECORD-TO-RECORD VARIABILITY AS WELL AS MODELLING UNCERTAINTY SOURCES IN DEVELOPING THE FRAGILITY CURVES AT COLLAPSE LIMIT STATE. IN THIS ARTICLE, IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE DISPERSION OF UNCERTAINTIES, GROUP METHOD OF DATA HANDLING (GMDH) IN COMBINATION WITH MONTE CARLO SIMULATION (MCS) USED TO DEVELOP STRUCTURAL COLLAPSE FRAGILITY CURVE, CONSIDERING EFFECTS OF EPISTEMIC AND ALEATORY UNCERTAINTIES. A STEEL MOMENT RESISTING FRAME (SMRF) IS CHOSEN AS THE TESTED STRUCTURE.N THE FRAGILITY CURVES OBTAINED BY THE PROPOSED METHOD WHICH IS BELONG TO GMDH APPROACHES ARE COMPARED WITH THOSE RESULTED FROM SIMPLE AND WELL-KNOWN AVAILABLE METHODS SUCH AS FIRST-ORDER SECOND-MOMENT (FOSM), APPROXIMATE SECOND-ORDER SECOND-MOMENT (ASOSM) AND MONTE CARLO (MC)/RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD (RSM), SOMEHOW, AS AN ACCURATE METHOD. THE RESULTS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE PROPOSED APPROACH INDICATE INCREASING ACCURACY AND PRECISION OF THE OUTPUTS AS WELL AS POWER WITH THE SAME COMPUTATIONAL TIME COMPARED TO AFOREMENTIONED METHODS. THE GMDH METHOD INTRODUCED HERE CAN BE APPLIED TO THE OTHER PERFORMANCE LEVELS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地震崩塌脆弱性数据处理算法的群法认知不确定性处理
开发脆弱性函数是将重要的不确定性纳入下一代基于性能的地震工程(PBEE)方法的重要步骤。本文的目的是在开发坍塌极限状态下的脆性曲线时,涉及记录到记录的可变性以及建模不确定性源。为了减少不确定性的分散,本文采用分组数据处理法(GMDH)结合蒙特卡罗模拟(MCS),在考虑认识和假设不确定性影响的情况下,建立了结构倒塌脆性曲线。选择钢抗弯框架(SMRF)作为试验结构。将所提出的属于GMDH方法的方法获得的脆性曲线与一阶二阶矩(FOSM)、近似二阶二阶力矩(ASOSM)和蒙特卡罗(MC)/响应面法(RSM)等简单而公知的方法得到的脆性曲线进行了比较,作为一种准确的方法。所提出的方法的应用结果表明,与上述方法相比,在相同的计算时间下,输出的精度和精度以及功率都有所提高。这里介绍的GMDH方法可以应用于其他性能级别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reliability-based design of reinforced concrete pipes to satisfy the TEBT Innovative Approach for Enhancing GLULAM Performance with Reinforcing Steel Bars: A BESO-based Study Sequential method of topological optimization in multi-component systems Coupling Modal Analysis with the BEM for the Transient Response of Bar Structures Interacting with Three-Dimensional Soil Profiles Experimental and Numerical Study on Ballistic Impact Response of Vehicle Tires
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1