MODE-ROUTE CHOICE DECISIONS: A CASE STUDY OF CPEC INVESTMENT IN PAKISTAN RAILWAYS

IF 0.4 Q4 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology-Series Transport Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.20858/sjsutst.2022.115.1
Y. Ali, Muhammad Sabir
{"title":"MODE-ROUTE CHOICE DECISIONS: A CASE STUDY OF CPEC INVESTMENT IN PAKISTAN RAILWAYS","authors":"Y. Ali, Muhammad Sabir","doi":"10.20858/sjsutst.2022.115.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study proposes the use of multi-criteria decision models (MCDM) for transportation mode-route choice decisions. This method is beneficial when trips' microdata are unavailable. Route-mode choice decisions were investigated for three public transportation modes (buses, railways, and airlines) in the post-China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) investment in Pakistan Railways (PR) for a link between Peshawar and Karachi. TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) was used for the mode choice decisions and a hybrid model of AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Approach) – TOPSIS was used for the route choice decision ML-1 link of PR. This study concludes that rails were the best mode of transportation in post-CPEC investment. Furthermore, route 3, linking Karachi to Peshawar via Lodhran, Multan, and Miniawali, is the best route connection among the four considered routes.","PeriodicalId":43740,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology-Series Transport","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology-Series Transport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2022.115.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes the use of multi-criteria decision models (MCDM) for transportation mode-route choice decisions. This method is beneficial when trips' microdata are unavailable. Route-mode choice decisions were investigated for three public transportation modes (buses, railways, and airlines) in the post-China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) investment in Pakistan Railways (PR) for a link between Peshawar and Karachi. TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) was used for the mode choice decisions and a hybrid model of AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Approach) – TOPSIS was used for the route choice decision ML-1 link of PR. This study concludes that rails were the best mode of transportation in post-CPEC investment. Furthermore, route 3, linking Karachi to Peshawar via Lodhran, Multan, and Miniawali, is the best route connection among the four considered routes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模式路线选择决策:中巴经济走廊在巴基斯坦铁路投资的案例研究
本研究提出使用多准则决策模型(MCDM)进行运输模式路线选择决策。当trips的微观数据不可用时,这种方法是有益的。对后中巴经济走廊(CPEC)中的三种公共交通方式(公共汽车、铁路和航空公司)的路线模式选择决策进行了调查。巴基斯坦铁路公司(PR)投资白沙瓦和卡拉奇之间的连接。采用TOPSIS(理想解相似偏好排序技术)进行模式选择决策,AHP(层次分析法)-TOPSIS混合模型用于PR ML-1路段的路线选择决策。本研究得出结论,铁路是后CPEC投资中的最佳运输模式。此外,经由洛德兰、木尔坦和Miniawali连接卡拉奇和白沙瓦的3号路线是四条考虑路线中最好的路线连接。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
PERSPECTIVES OF MULTIFUNCTIONAL INTEGRATED SUBURBAN-URBAN RAIL TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT ITS-PRO-FLOW: A NEW ENHANCED SHORT-TERM TRAFFIC FLOW PREDICTION FOR INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS OPTIMAL DOCKING PROBLEM OF UAV AT DETECTED MOVING OBJECT FACTORS RELATED TO MOTORCYCLING PERFORMANCE OF THE ELDERLY: A CASE STUDY OF KHI LEK SUBDISTRICT, UBON RATCHATHANI PROVINCE, THAILAND EVALUATION OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL PROCESS OF WAGON PROCESSING AT SHUNTING STATIONS USING THE SIMULATION MODEL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1