Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy–induced acute kidney injury on oncological outcomes in patients who underwent radical cystectomy: A multicenter retrospective study.
N. Fujita, M. Momota, S. Hatakeyama, H. Ito, T. Yoneyama, Y. Hashimoto, K. Yoshikawa, C. Ohyama
{"title":"Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy–induced acute kidney injury on oncological outcomes in patients who underwent radical cystectomy: A multicenter retrospective study.","authors":"N. Fujita, M. Momota, S. Hatakeyama, H. Ito, T. Yoneyama, Y. Hashimoto, K. Yoshikawa, C. Ohyama","doi":"10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"573 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Although previous studies have reported that AKI during cancer treatment was associated with poor oncological outcomes in several cancers, the impact of NAC-induced AKI on oncological outcomes in patients with MIBC remains unclear. Methods: This retrospective study included 398 patients who received 2-4 cycles of NAC followed by radical cystectomy (RC). AKI was defined according to the KDIGO criteria. Patients were divided into two groups: patients who developed AKI during NAC (AKI group) and patients who did not (non-AKI group). Multivariable Cox-proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of NAC-induced AKI on recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Results: The median age and follow-up period were 69 years and 62 months, respectively. Of the 398 patients, 66 (17%) developed AKI during NAC. The rates of <ypT2 and downstage in the AKI group were significantly lower than those in the non-AKI group (38% vs. 53%, P = 0.023; 53% vs. 69%, P = 0.013; respectively). After adjustment for age, performance status, cisplatin-based regimen, tumor grade, pathological T stage, pathological lymph-node involvement, and positive surgical margin, AKI was associated with shorter RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.619, P = 0.043), CSS (HR 1.727, P = 0.049), and OS (HR 1.848, P = 0.008). Conclusions: NAC-induced AKI was associated with reduced effects of NAC and poor oncological outcomes in patients who underwent RC.","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.573","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
573 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Although previous studies have reported that AKI during cancer treatment was associated with poor oncological outcomes in several cancers, the impact of NAC-induced AKI on oncological outcomes in patients with MIBC remains unclear. Methods: This retrospective study included 398 patients who received 2-4 cycles of NAC followed by radical cystectomy (RC). AKI was defined according to the KDIGO criteria. Patients were divided into two groups: patients who developed AKI during NAC (AKI group) and patients who did not (non-AKI group). Multivariable Cox-proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of NAC-induced AKI on recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Results: The median age and follow-up period were 69 years and 62 months, respectively. Of the 398 patients, 66 (17%) developed AKI during NAC. The rates of
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
