Development and preliminary testing of a framework for quantifying local service provision for people with dementia

IF 0.8 Q4 GERONTOLOGY Quality in Ageing and Older Adults Pub Date : 2020-11-23 DOI:10.1108/qaoa-03-2020-0010
J. Hughes, Saima Ahmed, P. Clarkson, S. Davies, K. Stewart, D. Challis
{"title":"Development and preliminary testing of a framework for quantifying local service provision for people with dementia","authors":"J. Hughes, Saima Ahmed, P. Clarkson, S. Davies, K. Stewart, D. Challis","doi":"10.1108/qaoa-03-2020-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIt was hypothesised that there were variations in health and social care services available for older people with dementia and their carers, and that measurement of this between localities was possible. The purpose of this paper is to present a framework for examining this.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing a case study approach, data from national surveys of local authorities providing social care and National Health Services Trusts providing old age mental health services conducted in 2014/2015 in England were used. From these, indicators of variation in services for people with dementia and their carers in different geographical areas were created. Measurement of the presence/absence of each service permitted the creation of a service mix score for each area.\n\n\nFindings\nThe framework comprised 16 attributes each with indicators describing the characteristics of the organisations providing the services; the skill mix of community mental health teams for older people; and the health care and social care services available in localities. Variation was evident, confirmed by quartile analysis and exemplars, suggesting that older people with dementia and their carers in different localities are likely to experience differences in the range of provision available, particularly social care services.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe case study approach used achieved its objectives, and the resultant framework has potential for generalisability and utility, given acceptable ecological validity and discriminant validity in identifying variations in service mix. It could be used in both research and practice.\n","PeriodicalId":44916,"journal":{"name":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qaoa-03-2020-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose It was hypothesised that there were variations in health and social care services available for older people with dementia and their carers, and that measurement of this between localities was possible. The purpose of this paper is to present a framework for examining this. Design/methodology/approach Using a case study approach, data from national surveys of local authorities providing social care and National Health Services Trusts providing old age mental health services conducted in 2014/2015 in England were used. From these, indicators of variation in services for people with dementia and their carers in different geographical areas were created. Measurement of the presence/absence of each service permitted the creation of a service mix score for each area. Findings The framework comprised 16 attributes each with indicators describing the characteristics of the organisations providing the services; the skill mix of community mental health teams for older people; and the health care and social care services available in localities. Variation was evident, confirmed by quartile analysis and exemplars, suggesting that older people with dementia and their carers in different localities are likely to experience differences in the range of provision available, particularly social care services. Originality/value The case study approach used achieved its objectives, and the resultant framework has potential for generalisability and utility, given acceptable ecological validity and discriminant validity in identifying variations in service mix. It could be used in both research and practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定和初步测试一个框架,以量化为痴呆症患者提供的地方服务
目的:假设老年痴呆症患者及其照顾者可获得的健康和社会护理服务存在差异,并且有可能在不同地区之间进行测量。本文的目的是提出一个检查这一点的框架。设计/方法/方法采用案例研究方法,使用了2014/2015年在英格兰对提供社会护理的地方当局和提供老年心理健康服务的国家卫生服务信托基金进行的全国调查的数据。据此,创建了不同地理区域对痴呆症患者及其护理人员的服务差异指标。测量每个服务的存在/缺失允许为每个区域创建一个服务组合分数。调查结果该框架包括16个属性,每个属性都有描述提供服务的组织特征的指标;社区老年人精神卫生团队的技能组合;以及各地提供的医疗保健和社会保健服务。四分位数分析和范例证实,差异是明显的,这表明不同地区的老年痴呆症患者及其护理人员可能在可提供的服务范围,特别是社会护理服务方面存在差异。独创性/价值所使用的案例研究方法实现了其目标,并且由此产生的框架具有推广和实用的潜力,在识别服务组合变化方面具有可接受的生态效度和判别效度。它可以用于研究和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Involving older adults and unpaid carers in the research cycle: reflections on implementing the UK national standards for public involvement into practice The relationship between older adults’ perceptions of ageing and depression: a systematic review Participatory action research and empowerment of nursing home residents Cognitive functioning and life satisfaction as predictors of subjective health complaints in elderly people Editorial: Recognising new partners and activities in older peoples’ care but also potential burdens in new forms of care and research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1