Membrane models for molecular simulations of peripheral membrane proteins

IF 7.7 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Advances in Physics: X Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1080/23746149.2021.1932589
Mahmoud Moqadam, Thibault Tubiana, Emmanuel E. Moutoussamy, N. Reuter
{"title":"Membrane models for molecular simulations of peripheral membrane proteins","authors":"Mahmoud Moqadam, Thibault Tubiana, Emmanuel E. Moutoussamy, N. Reuter","doi":"10.1080/23746149.2021.1932589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Peripheral membrane proteins (PMPs) bind temporarily to the surface of biological membranes. They also exist in a soluble form and their tertiary structure is often known. Yet, their membrane-bound form and their interfacial-binding site with membrane lipids remain difficult to observe directly. Their binding and unbinding mechanism, the conformational changes of the PMPs and their influence on the membrane structure are notoriously challenging to study experimentally. Molecular dynamics simulations are particularly useful to fill some knowledge-gaps and provide hypothesis that can be experimentally challenged to further our understanding of PMP-membrane recognition. Because of the time-scales of PMP-membrane binding events and the computational costs associated with molecular dynamics simulations, membrane models at different levels of resolution are used and often combined in multiscale simulation strategies. We here review membrane models belonging to three classes: atomistic, coarse-grained and implicit. Differences between models are rooted in the underlying theories and the reference data they are parameterized against. The choice of membrane model should therefore not only be guided by its computational efficiency. The range of applications of each model is discussed and illustrated using examples from the literature. Graphical abstract","PeriodicalId":7374,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physics: X","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23746149.2021.1932589","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physics: X","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2021.1932589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

ABSTRACT Peripheral membrane proteins (PMPs) bind temporarily to the surface of biological membranes. They also exist in a soluble form and their tertiary structure is often known. Yet, their membrane-bound form and their interfacial-binding site with membrane lipids remain difficult to observe directly. Their binding and unbinding mechanism, the conformational changes of the PMPs and their influence on the membrane structure are notoriously challenging to study experimentally. Molecular dynamics simulations are particularly useful to fill some knowledge-gaps and provide hypothesis that can be experimentally challenged to further our understanding of PMP-membrane recognition. Because of the time-scales of PMP-membrane binding events and the computational costs associated with molecular dynamics simulations, membrane models at different levels of resolution are used and often combined in multiscale simulation strategies. We here review membrane models belonging to three classes: atomistic, coarse-grained and implicit. Differences between models are rooted in the underlying theories and the reference data they are parameterized against. The choice of membrane model should therefore not only be guided by its computational efficiency. The range of applications of each model is discussed and illustrated using examples from the literature. Graphical abstract
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外周膜蛋白分子模拟的膜模型
外周膜蛋白(PMPs)暂时结合在生物膜表面。它们也以可溶形式存在,并且它们的三级结构通常是已知的。然而,它们的膜结合形式及其与膜脂质的界面结合位点仍然难以直接观察。众所周知,它们的结合和解除结合机制、PMP的构象变化及其对膜结构的影响对实验研究具有挑战性。分子动力学模拟特别有助于填补一些知识空白,并提供可以通过实验挑战的假设,以进一步理解PMP膜识别。由于PMP膜结合事件的时间尺度和与分子动力学模拟相关的计算成本,在多尺度模拟策略中使用并经常组合不同分辨率水平的膜模型。我们在这里回顾了属于三类的膜模型:原子模型、粗粒度模型和隐式模型。模型之间的差异源于其参数化所依据的基本理论和参考数据。因此,膜模型的选择不仅应以其计算效率为指导。使用文献中的例子讨论并说明了每个模型的应用范围。图形摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Physics: X
Advances in Physics: X Physics and Astronomy-General Physics and Astronomy
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Physics: X is a fully open-access journal that promotes the centrality of physics and physical measurement to modern science and technology. Advances in Physics: X aims to demonstrate the interconnectivity of physics, meaning the intellectual relationships that exist between one branch of physics and another, as well as the influence of physics across (hence the “X”) traditional boundaries into other disciplines including: Chemistry Materials Science Engineering Biology Medicine
期刊最新文献
Orbital angular momentum of Bloch electrons: equilibrium formulation, magneto-electric phenomena, and the orbital Hall effect Fundamental physics and other applications using nonneutral plasma Performance limits of information engines Insight into the interactions of fullerenes with biological membranes through molecular dynamics simulations 3D assembly of Janus spheres: potentials, dynamics, and experiments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1