Comparison of macroscale and microscale mechanical properties of fresh and fixed-frozen porcine colonic tissue.

Clíona M. McCarthy, Joanna Allardyce, Seamus Hickey, Michael T. Walsh, K. McGourty, J. Mulvihill
{"title":"Comparison of macroscale and microscale mechanical properties of fresh and fixed-frozen porcine colonic tissue.","authors":"Clíona M. McCarthy, Joanna Allardyce, Seamus Hickey, Michael T. Walsh, K. McGourty, J. Mulvihill","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4236169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mechanical changes to the microenvironment of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in tissue have been hypothesised to elicit a pathogenic response in the surrounding cells. Hence, 3D scaffolds are a popular method of studying cellular behaviour under conditions that mimic in vivo microenvironment. To create a 3D biomimetic scaffold that captures the in vivo ECM microenvironment a robust mechanical characterisation of the whole ECM at the microscale is necessary. This study examined the multiscale methods of characterising the ECM microenvironment using porcine colon tissue. To facilitate fresh tissue microscale mechanical characterisation, a protocol for sectioning fresh, unfixed, soft biological tissue was developed. Four experiments examined both the microscale and macroscale mechanics of both fresh (Fr) and fixed-frozen (FF) porcine colonic tissue using microindentation for microscale testing and uniaxial compression testing for macroscale testing. The results obtained in this study show a significant difference in elastic modulus between Fr and FF tissue at both the macroscale and microscale. There was an order of magnitude difference between the Fr and FF tissue at the microscale between each of the three layers of the colon tested i.e. the muscularis propria (MP), the submucosa (SM) and the mucosa (M). Macroscale testing cannot capture these regional differences. The findings in this study suggest that the most appropriate method for mechanically characterising the ECM is fresh microscale mechanical microindentation. These methods can be used on a range of biological tissues to create 3D biomimetic scaffolds that are more representative of the in vivo ECM, allowing for a more in-depth characterisation of the disease process.","PeriodicalId":94117,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials","volume":"138 1","pages":"105599"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4236169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mechanical changes to the microenvironment of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in tissue have been hypothesised to elicit a pathogenic response in the surrounding cells. Hence, 3D scaffolds are a popular method of studying cellular behaviour under conditions that mimic in vivo microenvironment. To create a 3D biomimetic scaffold that captures the in vivo ECM microenvironment a robust mechanical characterisation of the whole ECM at the microscale is necessary. This study examined the multiscale methods of characterising the ECM microenvironment using porcine colon tissue. To facilitate fresh tissue microscale mechanical characterisation, a protocol for sectioning fresh, unfixed, soft biological tissue was developed. Four experiments examined both the microscale and macroscale mechanics of both fresh (Fr) and fixed-frozen (FF) porcine colonic tissue using microindentation for microscale testing and uniaxial compression testing for macroscale testing. The results obtained in this study show a significant difference in elastic modulus between Fr and FF tissue at both the macroscale and microscale. There was an order of magnitude difference between the Fr and FF tissue at the microscale between each of the three layers of the colon tested i.e. the muscularis propria (MP), the submucosa (SM) and the mucosa (M). Macroscale testing cannot capture these regional differences. The findings in this study suggest that the most appropriate method for mechanically characterising the ECM is fresh microscale mechanical microindentation. These methods can be used on a range of biological tissues to create 3D biomimetic scaffolds that are more representative of the in vivo ECM, allowing for a more in-depth characterisation of the disease process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新鲜与固定冷冻猪结肠组织宏观与微观力学性能的比较。
组织中细胞外基质(ECM)微环境的机械变化已被假设为在周围细胞中引发致病反应。因此,3D支架是在模拟体内微环境的条件下研究细胞行为的一种流行方法。为了创建捕捉体内ECM微环境的3D仿生支架,有必要在微观尺度上对整个ECM进行稳健的机械表征。这项研究检验了使用猪结肠组织表征ECM微环境的多尺度方法。为了促进新鲜组织的微观力学表征,开发了一种用于切片新鲜、未固定的软生物组织的方案。四个实验检查了新鲜(Fr)和固定冷冻(FF)猪结肠组织的微观和宏观力学,分别使用显微压痕进行微观测试和单轴压缩测试进行宏观测试。本研究中获得的结果表明,Fr和FF组织在宏观和微观尺度上的弹性模量存在显著差异。在所测试的结肠的三层(即固有肌层(MP)、粘膜下层(SM)和粘膜层(M))之间,Fr和FF组织在微观尺度上存在一个数量级的差异。宏观测试无法捕捉到这些区域差异。这项研究的结果表明,对ECM进行机械表征的最合适方法是新鲜的微尺度机械显微压痕。这些方法可以用于一系列生物组织,以创建更具体内ECM代表性的3D仿生支架,从而能够更深入地表征疾病过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Elastic constants of biogenic calcium carbonate" (155), 106570. Editorial Board An improved trabecular bone model based on Voronoi tessellation. Patient-specific finite element analysis of human corneal lenticules: An experimental and numerical study. Multistep deformation of helical fiber electrospun scaffold toward cardiac patches development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1