Experimental comparison of R290 and R600a and prediction of performance with machine learning algorithms

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Science and Technology for the Built Environment Pub Date : 2023-04-04 DOI:10.1080/23744731.2023.2197815
Oguzhan Pektezel, H. Acar
{"title":"Experimental comparison of R290 and R600a and prediction of performance with machine learning algorithms","authors":"Oguzhan Pektezel, H. Acar","doi":"10.1080/23744731.2023.2197815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of alternative refrigerants is among the popular topics of the refrigeration industry. In the first part of this study, thermodynamic performances of R290 and R600a gases were compared in a vapor compression refrigeration experiment setup. Although R600a caused an average of 33.44% less compressor power consumption compared to R290 refrigerant, R290 provided an average of 23.77% increase in COP (coefficient of performance), 82.55% in cooling capacity, and 20.99% increase in second law efficiency compared to R600a. In the second part of the study, the performance parameters of the refrigeration system were predicted with MLP (multi-layer perceptron), SVM (support vector machine), and DT (decision tree) machine learning algorithms. It was detected that the SVM method predicted all parameters with the least error. MAE (mean absolute error) values detected in the COP prediction with test set were 0.0317, 0.0324, and 0.0989 for SVM, MLP, and DT, respectively. Results revealed that performance of the refrigeration system increased when utilizing R290, and SVM was superior in prediction of performance indicators compared to other machine learning methods.","PeriodicalId":21556,"journal":{"name":"Science and Technology for the Built Environment","volume":"29 1","pages":"508 - 522"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Technology for the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744731.2023.2197815","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The use of alternative refrigerants is among the popular topics of the refrigeration industry. In the first part of this study, thermodynamic performances of R290 and R600a gases were compared in a vapor compression refrigeration experiment setup. Although R600a caused an average of 33.44% less compressor power consumption compared to R290 refrigerant, R290 provided an average of 23.77% increase in COP (coefficient of performance), 82.55% in cooling capacity, and 20.99% increase in second law efficiency compared to R600a. In the second part of the study, the performance parameters of the refrigeration system were predicted with MLP (multi-layer perceptron), SVM (support vector machine), and DT (decision tree) machine learning algorithms. It was detected that the SVM method predicted all parameters with the least error. MAE (mean absolute error) values detected in the COP prediction with test set were 0.0317, 0.0324, and 0.0989 for SVM, MLP, and DT, respectively. Results revealed that performance of the refrigeration system increased when utilizing R290, and SVM was superior in prediction of performance indicators compared to other machine learning methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
R290和R600a的实验比较及机器学习算法的性能预测
替代制冷剂的使用是制冷行业的热门话题之一。本文首先在蒸汽压缩制冷实验装置中比较了R290和R600a两种气体的热力学性能。与R600a相比,R600a制冷剂的压缩机功耗平均降低33.44%,但性能系数、制冷量和第二定律效率分别提高23.77%、82.55%和20.99%。在研究的第二部分,采用MLP(多层感知器)、SVM(支持向量机)和DT(决策树)机器学习算法对制冷系统的性能参数进行预测。结果表明,支持向量机方法能以最小的误差预测所有参数。使用测试集进行COP预测时,SVM、MLP和DT的平均绝对误差(MAE)分别为0.0317、0.0324和0.0989。结果表明,使用R290时,制冷系统的性能有所提高,SVM在性能指标的预测方面优于其他机器学习方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science and Technology for the Built Environment
Science and Technology for the Built Environment THERMODYNAMICSCONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECH-CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Science and Technology for the Built Environment (formerly HVAC&R Research) is ASHRAE’s archival research publication, offering comprehensive reporting of original research in science and technology related to the stationary and mobile built environment, including indoor environmental quality, thermodynamic and energy system dynamics, materials properties, refrigerants, renewable and traditional energy systems and related processes and concepts, integrated built environmental system design approaches and tools, simulation approaches and algorithms, building enclosure assemblies, and systems for minimizing and regulating space heating and cooling modes. The journal features review articles that critically assess existing literature and point out future research directions.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the emissions reduction potential and economic feasibility of small-scale (<100 kWe) combined heat and power systems with thermal storage for multi-family residential applications in the United States Advanced co-simulation framework for assessing the interplay between occupant behaviors and demand flexibility in commercial buildings Ground heat exchanger design tool with RowWise placement of boreholes Socioeconomic factors influencing residential occupancy trends during and post COVID pandemic Buildings XV Conference Special Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1