Comparison of Buccal Corridor Width in Post Treatment Patients Treated with Non Extraction Vs Extraction Therapy in Mithilanchal Population

Darshana Sarkar, P. Mishra, S Kumar
{"title":"Comparison of Buccal Corridor Width in Post Treatment Patients Treated with Non Extraction Vs Extraction Therapy in Mithilanchal Population","authors":"Darshana Sarkar, P. Mishra, S Kumar","doi":"10.3126/ojn.v12i2.51360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: A wide variety of opinion exists on the effect of extraction on the buccal corridor width which has a direct impact on smile esthetics. Till date no study regarding this has been done in Mithilanchal population.\nAims and objectives: To compare the post-treatment buccal corridor width and posterior corridor width of patients treated with or without four first premolars extraction in Mithilanchal population.\nMaterials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at department of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics in Mithila Minority Dental College and Hospital, Darbhanga, Bihar. Post treatment posed smile photographs of 24 extraction patients and 24 non-extraction patients were compared using standardization and cropping in adobe Photoshop version 7.0. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS software (IBM Corp 2013; Version 22.0; Armonk, NY) and independent t-test to compare buccal corridor width and posterior corridor width between two groups.\nResults: The age group of subjects varied from 1 3 to 26 years. The mean age of group 1 (extraction) and group 2 (non-extraction) patients were 1 7.75 ± 4.48 years and 20.21 ± 4.03 years respectively. The mean width of buccal corridor in extraction patients were 35.33 ± 1 .52 % and for non-extraction group was found to be 35.38 ± 1 .54 %. (non-significant,p = 0.903). The posterior corridor mean width was 20.46 % in group 1 patients and 19.83% in group 2 patients (non-significant, p = 0.274).\nConclusion: No significant difference in the buccal corridor and posterior corridor widths was found after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of the first four premolars.","PeriodicalId":31197,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontic Journal of Nepal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontic Journal of Nepal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/ojn.v12i2.51360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A wide variety of opinion exists on the effect of extraction on the buccal corridor width which has a direct impact on smile esthetics. Till date no study regarding this has been done in Mithilanchal population. Aims and objectives: To compare the post-treatment buccal corridor width and posterior corridor width of patients treated with or without four first premolars extraction in Mithilanchal population. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at department of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics in Mithila Minority Dental College and Hospital, Darbhanga, Bihar. Post treatment posed smile photographs of 24 extraction patients and 24 non-extraction patients were compared using standardization and cropping in adobe Photoshop version 7.0. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS software (IBM Corp 2013; Version 22.0; Armonk, NY) and independent t-test to compare buccal corridor width and posterior corridor width between two groups. Results: The age group of subjects varied from 1 3 to 26 years. The mean age of group 1 (extraction) and group 2 (non-extraction) patients were 1 7.75 ± 4.48 years and 20.21 ± 4.03 years respectively. The mean width of buccal corridor in extraction patients were 35.33 ± 1 .52 % and for non-extraction group was found to be 35.38 ± 1 .54 %. (non-significant,p = 0.903). The posterior corridor mean width was 20.46 % in group 1 patients and 19.83% in group 2 patients (non-significant, p = 0.274). Conclusion: No significant difference in the buccal corridor and posterior corridor widths was found after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of the first four premolars.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
米蒂兰恰尔人群非拔牙与拔牙治疗后患者颊道宽度的比较
引言:关于颊廊宽度的提取效果,存在着各种各样的意见,而颊廊宽度对微笑美学有着直接的影响。到目前为止,还没有在Mithilanchal人群中对此进行过研究。目的和目的:比较Mithilanchal人群中接受或不接受四颗第一前磨牙拔除的患者治疗后颊廊宽度和后廊宽度。材料和方法:这是一项横断面研究,在比哈尔邦Darbhanga的Mithila少数民族牙科学院和医院的口腔正畸和颌面整形科进行。在adobe Photoshop 7.0版中使用标准化和裁剪对24名拔牙患者和24名非拔牙患者的治疗后姿势微笑照片进行了比较。使用SPSS软件(IBM Corp 2013;版本22.0;纽约州Armonk)和独立t检验进行统计分析,以比较两组之间的颊廊宽度和后廊宽度。结果:受试者年龄组为13~26岁。第1组(拔出)和第2组(未拔出)患者的平均年龄分别为7.75±4.48岁和20.21±4.03岁。拔除组的颊廊平均宽度为35.33±1.52%,非拔除组为35.38±1.54%。(无统计学意义,p=0.903)。第1组患者的后廊平均宽度为20.46%,第2组患者的平均宽度为19.83%(无统计学价值,p=0.274)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of thalassaemia major on components of the craniofacial complex- a cephalometric study in Andhra Pradesh population A Study of Bolton’s Analysis on Permanent Dentition of Nepalese Citizen of Lumbini Province Evidence-Based Orthodontics The prevalence of malocclusions in patients seeking orthodontic treatment at COMS from Chitwan District of Nepal Correction of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion in a Growing Child Using Standard Twin Block: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1