Outcomes of Surgical Decompression for Spinal Metastases From Gynecological Cancers: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Luiz A. Vieira Netto, Luís Felipe Araújo Peres, Nayara Matos Pereira, Alice Jardim Zaccariotti1, Vladimir Arruda Zaccariotti, Rômulo Alberto Silva Marques, João Batista Arruda, Edesio Martins, Rodrigo Alves de Carvalho Cavalcante
{"title":"Outcomes of Surgical Decompression for Spinal Metastases From Gynecological Cancers: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Luiz A. Vieira Netto, Luís Felipe Araújo Peres, Nayara Matos Pereira, Alice Jardim Zaccariotti1, Vladimir Arruda Zaccariotti, Rômulo Alberto Silva Marques, João Batista Arruda, Edesio Martins, Rodrigo Alves de Carvalho Cavalcante","doi":"10.32598/irjns.7.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Gynecological cancer is one of the most common types of cancer worldwide. Nonetheless, spinal metastasis from gynecological cancer is scarcely reported in the literature. In cases of spinal cord compression, the standard treatment is a decompressive surgery followed by radiotherapy treatment for selected patients. This study aimed to report the overall survival and surgical results in patients presenting with gynecological spinal metastases who underwent spinal cord/nerve root decompression and stabilization. Methods and Materials/Patients: A total of 18 patients were included in this study. The surgical procedures were performed from 2012 to 2019. The evaluation of neurological status, spinal stability, and pain were performed using the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (ASIA), Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), respectively. Results: The lumbar spine was the most affected location (n=30; 50.0%). Regarding the preoperative neurological deficits, 16 cases (n=16; 88.9%) presented ASIA graded A–D before the surgery, being reduced to five (n=5; 27.8%) after the procedures. The pain level means (pre-and postoperative) were 9.39±0.79 and 2.28±1.44. The overall median survival was 6.1 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI] of 1.10–11.13 months). The mean survival of ambulatory and non-ambulatory patients before the surgery was 7.36 months and 3.2 months, respectively (P=0.007 – Log-rank Mantel–Cox). Conclusion: Decompressive surgery and stabilization promote mechanical pain relief, spinal stability, an improvement of neurological function, and indirectly improving quality of life, despite a dismal overall survival of patients who present with metastatic spinal compression disease.","PeriodicalId":53336,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/irjns.7.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim: Gynecological cancer is one of the most common types of cancer worldwide. Nonetheless, spinal metastasis from gynecological cancer is scarcely reported in the literature. In cases of spinal cord compression, the standard treatment is a decompressive surgery followed by radiotherapy treatment for selected patients. This study aimed to report the overall survival and surgical results in patients presenting with gynecological spinal metastases who underwent spinal cord/nerve root decompression and stabilization. Methods and Materials/Patients: A total of 18 patients were included in this study. The surgical procedures were performed from 2012 to 2019. The evaluation of neurological status, spinal stability, and pain were performed using the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (ASIA), Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), respectively. Results: The lumbar spine was the most affected location (n=30; 50.0%). Regarding the preoperative neurological deficits, 16 cases (n=16; 88.9%) presented ASIA graded A–D before the surgery, being reduced to five (n=5; 27.8%) after the procedures. The pain level means (pre-and postoperative) were 9.39±0.79 and 2.28±1.44. The overall median survival was 6.1 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI] of 1.10–11.13 months). The mean survival of ambulatory and non-ambulatory patients before the surgery was 7.36 months and 3.2 months, respectively (P=0.007 – Log-rank Mantel–Cox). Conclusion: Decompressive surgery and stabilization promote mechanical pain relief, spinal stability, an improvement of neurological function, and indirectly improving quality of life, despite a dismal overall survival of patients who present with metastatic spinal compression disease.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇科肿瘤脊柱转移手术减压的疗效:一项回顾性队列研究
背景与目的:妇科癌症是世界范围内最常见的癌症类型之一。然而,文献中很少报道妇科肿瘤的脊柱转移。在脊髓受压的情况下,标准的治疗方法是减压手术,然后对选定的患者进行放疗。本研究旨在报道接受脊髓/神经根减压和稳定治疗的妇科脊柱转移患者的总体生存率和手术结果。方法和材料/患者:本研究共纳入18例患者。手术于2012年至2019年进行。分别使用美国脊髓损伤协会损伤量表(ASIA)、脊柱不稳定性肿瘤评分(SINS)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估神经系统状态、脊柱稳定性和疼痛。结果:腰椎是受影响最大的部位(n=30;50.0%)。术前神经功能缺损16例(n=16;88.9%的患者术前ASIA评分为A-D,降至5例(n=5;27.8%)。疼痛水平平均值(术前和术后)分别为9.39±0.79和2.28±1.44。总中位生存期为6.1个月(95%可信区间[CI]为1.10-11.13个月)。术前门诊患者和非门诊患者的平均生存期分别为7.36个月和3.2个月(P=0.007 - Log-rank Mantel-Cox)。结论:尽管存在转移性脊柱压迫疾病的患者总体生存率较低,但减压手术和稳定可促进机械性疼痛缓解、脊柱稳定、神经功能改善,并间接改善生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Professor Abbas Amirjamshidi: A Mentor Par-excellence Treatment of Subaxial Cervical Spine Injuries at the University Hospital Center of Brazzaville, Congo Idiopathic Ventral Spinal Cord Herniation: An Illustrative Case and Literature Review Investigating Spine and Spinal Cord Complications of COVID-19 Clinical and Radiological Changes at the Adjacent Segments Following Cervical Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1