‘And what did you do about my emotions during Covid‐19?’ Making sense of negative emotions at work through institutional logics and Critical Systems Heuristics

IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-04-26 DOI:10.1002/sres.2952
E. Tavella
{"title":"‘And what did you do about my emotions during Covid‐19?’ Making sense of negative emotions at work through institutional logics and Critical Systems Heuristics","authors":"E. Tavella","doi":"10.1002/sres.2952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The literature on Covid-19 has demonstrated that frontline workers use different coping strategies and engage in sense-making to address negative emotions. However, we know little about the underlying process of sense-making. Thus, this paper uses institutional logics to investigate how sense-making of negative emotions is enabled and constrained. This analysis draws on a diary written by a nurse at an Italian hospital, which represents an account of the emotions experienced by medical staff. The analysis identifies a set of enablers and disablers of sense-making, as well as, the patterns that alleviate and intensify frontline workers' emotions. Based on these findings and evidence of the Covid-task force at Papa Giovanni XXIII hospital in Bergamo, Italy, this paper illustrates Critical Systems Heuristics as a means to address the disablers of sense-making through participatory conversations that consider different institutional logics.","PeriodicalId":47538,"journal":{"name":"SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2952","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The literature on Covid-19 has demonstrated that frontline workers use different coping strategies and engage in sense-making to address negative emotions. However, we know little about the underlying process of sense-making. Thus, this paper uses institutional logics to investigate how sense-making of negative emotions is enabled and constrained. This analysis draws on a diary written by a nurse at an Italian hospital, which represents an account of the emotions experienced by medical staff. The analysis identifies a set of enablers and disablers of sense-making, as well as, the patterns that alleviate and intensify frontline workers' emotions. Based on these findings and evidence of the Covid-task force at Papa Giovanni XXIII hospital in Bergamo, Italy, this paper illustrates Critical Systems Heuristics as a means to address the disablers of sense-making through participatory conversations that consider different institutional logics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“在新冠肺炎-19期间,你对我的情绪做了什么?”通过制度逻辑和批判系统启发法理解工作中的负面情绪
关于Covid-19的文献表明,一线工作人员使用不同的应对策略,并参与意义构建来应对负面情绪。然而,我们对意义形成的基本过程知之甚少。因此,本文运用制度逻辑来研究消极情绪的意义建构是如何被激活和约束的。这一分析借鉴了意大利一家医院的一名护士写的日记,日记描述了医务人员所经历的情绪。该分析确定了一系列促进和阻碍意义形成的因素,以及缓解和强化一线员工情绪的模式。根据这些发现和意大利贝加莫Papa Giovanni XXIII医院covid - 19工作队的证据,本文说明了关键系统启发式法是通过考虑不同制度逻辑的参与性对话解决意义构建障碍的一种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
14.80%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Systems Research and Behavioral Science publishes original articles on new theories, experimental research, and applications relating to all levels of living and non-living systems. Its scope is comprehensive, dealing with systems approaches to: the redesign of organisational and societal structures; the management of administrative and business processes; problems of change management; the implementation of procedures to increase the quality of work and life; the resolution of clashes of norms and values; social cognitive processes; modelling; the introduction of new scientific results, etc. The editors especially want manuscripts of a theoretical or empirical nature which have broad interdisciplinary implications not found in a journal devoted to a single discipline.
期刊最新文献
Rural electrification in India: A wicked problem Enhancing group recommender systems: A fusion of social tagging and collaborative filtering for cohesive recommendations Archetypal representations of dilemmas concerning invasive alien species management—A case of invasive Lantana camara in the protected areas of Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, India Understanding vehicle demand dynamics in Indian road transport: A qualitative framework An application of systems thinking to group-based organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1