Longer, Healthier, Happier: Why Working Longer Improves Almost Everything

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Retirement Pub Date : 2023-05-24 DOI:10.3905/jor.2023.1.138
Laurence B. Siegel, Stephen C. Sexauer
{"title":"Longer, Healthier, Happier: Why Working Longer Improves Almost Everything","authors":"Laurence B. Siegel, Stephen C. Sexauer","doi":"10.3905/jor.2023.1.138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most Americans retire around age 65 because of a decision made in Germany more than a century ago. Today, this is not economically practical and fights human nature. While some people do happily and successfully retire before 65, many can’t, or don’t want to. This article looks at the gains from working longer. We argue that working longer produces more pre- and post-retirement income, more employer profits, higher tax revenue, and a more optimal social configuration. Using simulations, we show the improvement in incomes from working to various ages and at various levels of engagement. We present a solution. Laws, regulations, and other institutional factors, mostly put in place with good intentions to protect workers, keep employers and employees from negotiating individualized wage and hour agreements in older age, even when both would benefit. We advocate establishing a purely voluntary “unprotected class” into which any employee can opt, making both employer and employee immune from age discrimination lawsuits and other obstacles to these individually negotiated deals. It’s all upside for both parties, since nobody would ever be required to join the unprotected class.","PeriodicalId":36429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retirement","volume":"11 1","pages":"7 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retirement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jor.2023.1.138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most Americans retire around age 65 because of a decision made in Germany more than a century ago. Today, this is not economically practical and fights human nature. While some people do happily and successfully retire before 65, many can’t, or don’t want to. This article looks at the gains from working longer. We argue that working longer produces more pre- and post-retirement income, more employer profits, higher tax revenue, and a more optimal social configuration. Using simulations, we show the improvement in incomes from working to various ages and at various levels of engagement. We present a solution. Laws, regulations, and other institutional factors, mostly put in place with good intentions to protect workers, keep employers and employees from negotiating individualized wage and hour agreements in older age, even when both would benefit. We advocate establishing a purely voluntary “unprotected class” into which any employee can opt, making both employer and employee immune from age discrimination lawsuits and other obstacles to these individually negotiated deals. It’s all upside for both parties, since nobody would ever be required to join the unprotected class.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更长,更健康,更快乐:为什么工作时间更长几乎可以改善一切
大多数美国人在65岁左右退休,因为一个多世纪前德国做出了一个决定。今天,这在经济上是不现实的,而且违背了人性。虽然有些人在65岁之前快乐而成功地退休,但许多人不能或不想退休。本文将探讨延长工作时间的好处。我们认为,工作时间越长,退休前和退休后的收入就越高,雇主的利润就越高,税收就越高,社会结构就越优化。通过模拟,我们展示了在不同年龄和不同投入程度的工作中收入的提高。我们提出了一个解决方案。法律、法规和其他制度因素大多是出于保护工人的良好意愿而实施的,它们阻止雇主和雇员在老年时就个人工资和工时协议进行谈判,即使双方都能从中受益。我们主张建立一个完全自愿的“不受保护的班级”,任何员工都可以选择加入,使雇主和员工都免于年龄歧视诉讼和这些单独谈判协议的其他障碍。这对双方都是有利的,因为没有人会被要求加入不受保护的班级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Retirement
Journal of Retirement Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Investment Restrictions on Pension Participants: A Case Study of Nigeria Editor’s Letter The Role of Annuities in Managing Sequence of Returns Risk Approaching and in Retirement guest commentary Valuation of Financial Decision-Making Retirement Planning, Retirement Insecurity, and Financial Satisfaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1