Rise and Decline of the Westphalian Principle in Taxation: The Web Tax Case

IF 0.9 Q2 LAW EC Tax Review Pub Date : 2020-03-01 DOI:10.54648/ecta2020002
M. Greggi
{"title":"Rise and Decline of the Westphalian Principle in Taxation: The Web Tax Case","authors":"M. Greggi","doi":"10.54648/ecta2020002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses the crucial impact that the digital economy is having on international taxation and argues that the traditional taxing rules are inadequate to address the way that multinational enterprises are conducting business on the Internet and how value is created on the Web. The cornerstone of this analysis consists of the observation that, while the power of the states to tax is intrinsically connected to territory (thus, to a physical element), the Internet economy is not as it takes places in a virtual space (a Terra Incognita) which is, in legal terms, still uncharted.\nThis situation is challenging the intimate connection between the power to tax and the territory state Sovereignty can be exercised on, superiorem non recognoscens. This is the Westphalian Principle, as commonly understood in History, and it is the pillar states have been built on since the mid-seventeenth century, in Europe. This article eventually considers the most recent development to overtake this empasse, in particular, the digital tax proposal as suggested by the European Commission in 2018. In this respect, it concludes that, while the European strategy is positive in terms of policy, in a purely legal perspective, it might initiate possible retaliation from qualified international stakeholders (including States such as the US) that would see their potential taxable base eroded by foreign unilateral measures and without any previous agreement in this sense.\ne-commerce, digital taxation, territoriality, income taxation, net neutrality, double taxation, tax competition, sovereignty, base erosion, BEPS.","PeriodicalId":43686,"journal":{"name":"EC Tax Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EC Tax Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2020002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyses the crucial impact that the digital economy is having on international taxation and argues that the traditional taxing rules are inadequate to address the way that multinational enterprises are conducting business on the Internet and how value is created on the Web. The cornerstone of this analysis consists of the observation that, while the power of the states to tax is intrinsically connected to territory (thus, to a physical element), the Internet economy is not as it takes places in a virtual space (a Terra Incognita) which is, in legal terms, still uncharted. This situation is challenging the intimate connection between the power to tax and the territory state Sovereignty can be exercised on, superiorem non recognoscens. This is the Westphalian Principle, as commonly understood in History, and it is the pillar states have been built on since the mid-seventeenth century, in Europe. This article eventually considers the most recent development to overtake this empasse, in particular, the digital tax proposal as suggested by the European Commission in 2018. In this respect, it concludes that, while the European strategy is positive in terms of policy, in a purely legal perspective, it might initiate possible retaliation from qualified international stakeholders (including States such as the US) that would see their potential taxable base eroded by foreign unilateral measures and without any previous agreement in this sense. e-commerce, digital taxation, territoriality, income taxation, net neutrality, double taxation, tax competition, sovereignty, base erosion, BEPS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
威斯特伐利亚税收原则的兴衰:以网络税收为例
本文分析了数字经济对国际税收的重要影响,并认为传统的税收规则不足以解决跨国企业在互联网上开展业务的方式以及如何在网络上创造价值。这一分析的基础是观察到,虽然国家征税的权力本质上与领土(因此,与物理元素)有关,但互联网经济并不像它发生在虚拟空间(一个未知的领域)那样,在法律上仍然是未知的。这种情况对征税权与国家主权所能行使的领土之间的紧密联系提出了挑战。这就是历史上普遍理解的威斯特伐利亚原则,也是自17世纪中叶以来欧洲各国赖以建立的支柱。本文最终考虑了取代这一观念的最新发展,特别是欧盟委员会在2018年提出的数字税提案。在这方面,它得出的结论是,虽然欧洲的战略在政策方面是积极的,但从纯粹的法律角度来看,它可能会引发合格的国际利益相关者(包括美国等国家)可能的报复,这些利益相关者将看到他们的潜在应税基础被外国单方面措施侵蚀,而且在这方面没有任何先前的协议。电子商务、数字税收、地域性、所得税、网络中立性、双重征税、税收竞争、主权、税基侵蚀、BEPS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
33.30%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Editorial: We Need to Know When Previous Case-Law Has Been ‘Overruled’! - A Plea for More Legal Certainty in EU Tax Tax Information, Third Parties and GDPR: Legal Challenges and Hints from the Court of Justice DAC7: Some Thoughts on the Different Roles of Platform Operators and the Appropriate Definition of the Scope of Reporting Obligations Forum: AG Kokott Tries to Bring Clarity to the Selectivity Test for Individual Tax Rulings VAT in the Digital Age Package: Singling Out the Single VAT Registration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1