Isolation of probiotics and nutritional evaluation of fermented lactose-free foods as a potential treatment for diarrhoea

Dupe Temilade Otolowo, Stephen Abiola Akinola, Monsura Bello, Janet Oluwatoyin Alaba, Elizabeth Damilola Ajejomoniyi
{"title":"Isolation of probiotics and nutritional evaluation of fermented lactose-free foods as a \npotential treatment for diarrhoea","authors":"Dupe Temilade Otolowo, Stephen Abiola Akinola, Monsura Bello, Janet Oluwatoyin Alaba, Elizabeth Damilola Ajejomoniyi","doi":"10.17508/cjfst.2021.13.2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Probiotics are live bacteria that can be found in fermented local foods and \nconfer health benefits on the host when administered in adequate amounts. \nHowever, there is little awareness of local fermented, lactose-free foods as \ngood and cheap sources of probiotics that could be employed in the dietary \nmanagement of diarrhoea instead of the expensive antibiotic drugs. The local \nfood materials were fermented and prepared into their respective meals using \ntraditional methods. The probiotic population, nutrient quality, and energy \nvalue of the fermented foods, and the prepared meals were investigated. \nProbiotics were isolated and enumerated from the meals using standard pour-\nplating techniques, while the proximate composition of the samples was \nevaluated using standard methods. The used food samples include; Sorghum \n‘ogí’ (SP), Soya flour, ‘Garri’, and formulated meals from Sorghum ‘ogí’ (SP) \nand Soya four as 90% ‘ogí’+10% soya (TS), 80% ‘ogí’+20% soya (PS), and \n70% ‘ogí’+30% soya (ST). The probiotic (LAB) population identified in the \nmeals includes Bifidobacterium lactis at concentration ranges of (3.41x102–\n7.77x106 CFU/g), Lactobacillus acidophilus (1.48x103–3.69x106 CFU/g) and \nLactobacillus bulgaricus (1.01x102–7.39x104 CFU/g). Bifidobacterium lactis \nhad the highest population (7.77×10⁶ CFU/g) in PS, while Lactobacillus \nacidophilus (3.69×10⁶ CFU/g) and Lactobacillus bulgaricus (7.39×10⁴ CFU/g) \nwere highest in ST. However, only the PS meal met the RDA standards for \nboth Bifidobacterium lactis (≥106 CFU/g) and Lactobacillus bulgaricus (103 \nCFU/g) implying a good source of probiotics, and exhibited good nutrient \nquality; (69.48%) moisture, (7.10%) protein, (3.34%) ash, (6.70%) crude fat, \n(2.76%) fibre and (10.60%) carbohydrates. Thus, the formulated PS meal with \nan adequate concentration of probiotics of acclaimed health benefits possesses \nthe potential for a therapeutic diet that could help in ameliorating the effect of \ngastrointestinal disorder and diarrhoea. Also, the good nutrient quality and \nenergy value of the meal indicates its capability for faster recuperation after a \nhealth disorder like diarrhoea.","PeriodicalId":10771,"journal":{"name":"Croatian journal of food science and technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian journal of food science and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17508/cjfst.2021.13.2.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Probiotics are live bacteria that can be found in fermented local foods and confer health benefits on the host when administered in adequate amounts. However, there is little awareness of local fermented, lactose-free foods as good and cheap sources of probiotics that could be employed in the dietary management of diarrhoea instead of the expensive antibiotic drugs. The local food materials were fermented and prepared into their respective meals using traditional methods. The probiotic population, nutrient quality, and energy value of the fermented foods, and the prepared meals were investigated. Probiotics were isolated and enumerated from the meals using standard pour- plating techniques, while the proximate composition of the samples was evaluated using standard methods. The used food samples include; Sorghum ‘ogí’ (SP), Soya flour, ‘Garri’, and formulated meals from Sorghum ‘ogí’ (SP) and Soya four as 90% ‘ogí’+10% soya (TS), 80% ‘ogí’+20% soya (PS), and 70% ‘ogí’+30% soya (ST). The probiotic (LAB) population identified in the meals includes Bifidobacterium lactis at concentration ranges of (3.41x102– 7.77x106 CFU/g), Lactobacillus acidophilus (1.48x103–3.69x106 CFU/g) and Lactobacillus bulgaricus (1.01x102–7.39x104 CFU/g). Bifidobacterium lactis had the highest population (7.77×10⁶ CFU/g) in PS, while Lactobacillus acidophilus (3.69×10⁶ CFU/g) and Lactobacillus bulgaricus (7.39×10⁴ CFU/g) were highest in ST. However, only the PS meal met the RDA standards for both Bifidobacterium lactis (≥106 CFU/g) and Lactobacillus bulgaricus (103 CFU/g) implying a good source of probiotics, and exhibited good nutrient quality; (69.48%) moisture, (7.10%) protein, (3.34%) ash, (6.70%) crude fat, (2.76%) fibre and (10.60%) carbohydrates. Thus, the formulated PS meal with an adequate concentration of probiotics of acclaimed health benefits possesses the potential for a therapeutic diet that could help in ameliorating the effect of gastrointestinal disorder and diarrhoea. Also, the good nutrient quality and energy value of the meal indicates its capability for faster recuperation after a health disorder like diarrhoea.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
益生菌的分离和无乳糖发酵食品作为治疗腹泻的潜在方法的营养评价
益生菌是一种活的细菌,可以在当地发酵的食物中找到,如果给予足够的量,就会对宿主的健康有益。然而,人们很少意识到,当地发酵的无乳糖食品是益生菌的良好和廉价来源,可以用于腹泻的饮食管理,而不是昂贵的抗生素药物。当地的食材通过传统的方法发酵制成各自的食物。研究了发酵食品和预制食品的益生菌数量、营养品质和能量值。使用标准的倒镀技术从膳食中分离和枚举益生菌,同时使用标准方法评估样品的近似组成。使用的食物样本包括;高粱' ogí ' (SP),大豆粉,' Garri ',以及高粱' ogí ' (SP)和大豆4号的配方食品为90% ' ogí ' +10%大豆(TS), 80% ' ogí ' +20%大豆(PS)和70% ' ogí ' +30%大豆(ST)。饲料中的益生菌群包括乳酸双歧杆菌(浓度范围为3.41 × 102 ~ 7.77 × 106 CFU/g)、嗜酸乳杆菌(浓度范围为1.48 × 103 ~ 3.69 × 106 CFU/g)和保加利亚乳杆菌(浓度范围为1.01 × 102 ~ 7.39 × 104 CFU/g)。PS中的乳酸双歧杆菌(7.77×10⁶CFU/g)数量最多,st中的嗜酸乳杆菌(3.69×10⁶CFU/g)和保加利亚乳杆菌(7.39×10⁴CFU/g)数量最多。然而,只有PS的膳食中乳酸双歧杆菌(≥106 CFU/g)和保加利亚乳杆菌(103 CFU/g)均符合RDA标准,这表明PS的益生菌来源良好,营养品质良好;(69.48%)水分,(7.10%)蛋白质,(3.34%)灰分,(6.70%)粗脂肪,(2.76%)纤维和(10.60%)碳水化合物。因此,含有足够浓度的益生菌的配方PS餐具有潜在的治疗性饮食,可以帮助改善胃肠道疾病和腹泻的影响。此外,良好的营养质量和能量价值表明,它能够在腹泻等健康疾病后更快地恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Parametric statistical analysis of microbiological water quality indicators Pro-vitamin A content of red palm oil emulsions formed with malted bambara groundnut, Brachystegia eurycoma (achi) and cowpea Chemical and antioxidant properties of two non-dairy probiotic drinks produced from tigernut (Cyperus esculentus) and soybean (Glycine max) Standardization of 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay for measuring xylanase activity Effects of roasting conditions on sensory attributes, polyphenolic content and DPPH radical scavenging activity of peanut (Arachis hypogaea)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1