Over-Mobilization, Poor Integration of Care Groups: The French Hospital System in the Face of the Pandemic

IF 0.6 Q4 ECONOMICS Forum for Social Economics Pub Date : 2021-07-08 DOI:10.1080/07360932.2021.1946706
Ivan Sainsaulieu
{"title":"Over-Mobilization, Poor Integration of Care Groups: The French Hospital System in the Face of the Pandemic","authors":"Ivan Sainsaulieu","doi":"10.1080/07360932.2021.1946706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In France, the health system is characterized by both a centralizing State and strong market pressures (liberal medicine, pharmaceutical industries, etc.). Within the framework of budget reduction policies, this confrontation has led to savings on the productive wage bill within the public hospital rather than on medical fees or industrial profits, resulting in the elimination of beds and a reduction in the number of permanent staff, while administrative employment has increased for management staff. In the face of the pandemic, the mobilization of health care workers was able to demonstrate its effectiveness, compensating for the deficits in equipment and organization from above. Mutual aid is highly contextualized, based on local logics and interaction configurations. If mutual aid prevailed overall, exhaustion was spreading among the troops before the second wave and then the third wave. At the same time, the management did not involve the healthcare teams more in the decisions, contrary to certain participative attempts in the past. The management team, which was not involved in the crisis, tended to reassert its presence as if nothing had happened, even though a distinction had to be made between a type of management that was close to the patients and a type of management that was in control and enforced the hierarchy.","PeriodicalId":42478,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Social Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07360932.2021.1946706","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum for Social Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2021.1946706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract In France, the health system is characterized by both a centralizing State and strong market pressures (liberal medicine, pharmaceutical industries, etc.). Within the framework of budget reduction policies, this confrontation has led to savings on the productive wage bill within the public hospital rather than on medical fees or industrial profits, resulting in the elimination of beds and a reduction in the number of permanent staff, while administrative employment has increased for management staff. In the face of the pandemic, the mobilization of health care workers was able to demonstrate its effectiveness, compensating for the deficits in equipment and organization from above. Mutual aid is highly contextualized, based on local logics and interaction configurations. If mutual aid prevailed overall, exhaustion was spreading among the troops before the second wave and then the third wave. At the same time, the management did not involve the healthcare teams more in the decisions, contrary to certain participative attempts in the past. The management team, which was not involved in the crisis, tended to reassert its presence as if nothing had happened, even though a distinction had to be made between a type of management that was close to the patients and a type of management that was in control and enforced the hierarchy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过度动员,护理团体整合不良:面对大流行的法国医院系统
在法国,卫生系统的特点是中央集权的国家和强大的市场压力(自由医学,制药工业等)。在削减预算政策的框架内,这种对抗导致节省了公立医院的生产性工资账单,而不是医疗费用或工业利润,从而减少了床位,减少了长期工作人员的人数,同时增加了管理人员的行政就业。面对大流行病,动员保健工作者能够证明其有效性,弥补了设备和组织方面的不足。互助是高度情境化的,基于本地逻辑和交互配置。如果说互助在总体上占了上风,那么在第二波和第三波之前,部队的疲惫感正在蔓延。与此同时,管理层并没有让医疗团队更多地参与决策,这与过去某些参与性的尝试相反。没有卷入危机的管理团队倾向于重申自己的存在,就好像什么都没发生过一样,尽管必须区分一种管理方式是接近病人的,另一种管理方式是控制并执行等级制度的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
The European Economic Transition before, during, and after the Pandemic through the War in Ukraine International Organizations and Gender Parity in Education: Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)1 The Euro-Area Crisis and the Monetary Policy Response of the ECB: A Critical Investigation and Some Reform Proposals The Travels of the Washington Consensus: From the Global Financial Crisis to the Greek Financial Crisis EU Agricultural and Rural Development Policies Vis-à-Vis the Ecological Crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1