Implementation of a Symptom–Triggered Protocol for Severe Alcohol Withdrawal Treatment in a Medical Step-down Unit

Huang
{"title":"Implementation of a Symptom–Triggered Protocol for Severe Alcohol Withdrawal Treatment in a Medical Step-down Unit","authors":"Huang","doi":"10.12788/JCOM.0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Management of severe alcohol withdrawal and delirium tremens (DT) is challenging and requires significant resources, including close monitoring and intensive treatment, frequently in an intensive care unit (ICU).1 Early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention are important to limit potential complications associated with DT.2 Benzodiazepines are first-line therapeutic agents, but the definition of optimal use and dosing regimens has been limited, due to a lack of randomized controlled trials. In lower acuity patients admitted to a detoxification unit, systematic symptom–triggered benzodiazepine therapy (STT) has been established to be more effective than fixed-schedule (FS) dosing.3-5 Patients treated using STT require lower total benzodiazepine dosing and achieve shorter treatment durations. However, in higheracuity patients admitted to general medical services, analyses have not shown an advantage of STT over combined FS and STT.6 Methods The purpose of this study was to determine whether implementation of STT is more effective than FS dosing combined with episodic STT in the management of hospitalized high-acuity alcohol withdrawal patients. We conducted a preintervention and postintervention quasi-experimental study in the step-down unit (SDU) of a 305-bed community teaching hospital. The study population consisted of adult inpatients 18 years or older admitted or transferred to the 12-bed SDU with alcohol withdrawal, as defined by primary or secondary International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnoses. SDU admission criteria included patients with prior DT or those who had received multiple doses of benzodiazepines in the emergency department. In-hospital transfer to the SDU was at the physician’s discretion, if the patient required esca-","PeriodicalId":15393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/JCOM.0048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Management of severe alcohol withdrawal and delirium tremens (DT) is challenging and requires significant resources, including close monitoring and intensive treatment, frequently in an intensive care unit (ICU).1 Early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention are important to limit potential complications associated with DT.2 Benzodiazepines are first-line therapeutic agents, but the definition of optimal use and dosing regimens has been limited, due to a lack of randomized controlled trials. In lower acuity patients admitted to a detoxification unit, systematic symptom–triggered benzodiazepine therapy (STT) has been established to be more effective than fixed-schedule (FS) dosing.3-5 Patients treated using STT require lower total benzodiazepine dosing and achieve shorter treatment durations. However, in higheracuity patients admitted to general medical services, analyses have not shown an advantage of STT over combined FS and STT.6 Methods The purpose of this study was to determine whether implementation of STT is more effective than FS dosing combined with episodic STT in the management of hospitalized high-acuity alcohol withdrawal patients. We conducted a preintervention and postintervention quasi-experimental study in the step-down unit (SDU) of a 305-bed community teaching hospital. The study population consisted of adult inpatients 18 years or older admitted or transferred to the 12-bed SDU with alcohol withdrawal, as defined by primary or secondary International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnoses. SDU admission criteria included patients with prior DT or those who had received multiple doses of benzodiazepines in the emergency department. In-hospital transfer to the SDU was at the physician’s discretion, if the patient required esca-
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
症状触发方案在医疗降压单位重度酒精戒断治疗中的实施
严重酒精戒断和震颤谵妄(DT)的管理具有挑战性,需要大量资源,包括密切监测和强化治疗,通常在重症监护病房(ICU)进行早期诊断和治疗干预对于限制与dt相关的潜在并发症很重要。2苯二氮卓类药物是一线治疗药物,但由于缺乏随机对照试验,最佳使用和给药方案的定义有限。在接受解毒单位的低度患者中,系统症状触发的苯二氮卓类药物治疗(STT)已被证实比固定时间表(FS)给药更有效。3-5例使用STT治疗的患者需要较低的苯二氮卓类药物总剂量和较短的治疗持续时间。然而,在接受普通医疗服务的高急性度患者中,分析并未显示STT优于FS和STT联合治疗。6方法本研究的目的是确定在治疗住院的高急性度酒精戒断患者时,STT的实施是否比FS联合发作性STT更有效。我们在一家拥有305个床位的社区教学医院的降压单元(SDU)进行了干预前和干预后的准实验研究。研究人群由18岁或以上的成年住院患者组成,这些患者接受或转移到12个床位的SDU,并根据初级或二级国际疾病分类,第十版诊断进行定义。SDU的入院标准包括有DT病史的患者或在急诊科接受过多次苯二氮卓类药物治疗的患者。如果患者需要esca,则由医生决定是否将患者转移到SDU
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Glucagon Prescription Rates for Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Following Implementation of an Electronic Health Records Intervention Quality Improvement in Health Care: From Conceptual Frameworks and Definitions to Implementation The Hospitalist Triage Role for Reducing Admission Delays: Impacts on Throughput, Quality, Interprofessional Practice, and Clinician Experience of Care Redesign of Health Care Systems to Reduce Diagnostic Errors: Leveraging Human Experience and Artificial Intelligence Patient Safety in Transitions of Care: Addressing Discharge Communication Gaps and the Potential of the Teach-Back Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1