Come Correct: Itineraries of Discovery in Black Women's Ethnographic Practice

Krystal Strong, Jasmine Blanks Jones
{"title":"Come Correct: Itineraries of Discovery in Black Women's Ethnographic Practice","authors":"Krystal Strong,&nbsp;Jasmine Blanks Jones","doi":"10.1002/fea2.12102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This methodological reflection invokes the legacy of Black women anthropologists, who have approached ethnography not as encounters with “The Other” but as part of African Diasporic projects. As two U.S. Black women ethnographers, who understand our fieldwork contexts in West Africa as sites of return, re-discovery, and struggle, we situate our work within Black feminist genealogies, which refashion anthropological tools to re-map and reconstitute relations and recognition amongst those we call our kinfolk. We draw on “co-performative witnessing” (Madison 2007) and “mutual comradeship” (Burden-Stelly 2018) as counter-modalities of ethnographic praxis, which follow in this tradition of disrupting and re-routing the disciplinarily legitimized stakes of ethnography. Specifically, we re-narrate gatherings, by which we mean moments of being “gathered,” or collected and corrected in love. Within our respective “itineraries of discovery” (Walker 2015) in Liberia and Nigeria, we were confronted with dilemmas of personal and professional benefit in youth performance ethnography and challenged to relinquish political neutrality in activist ethnography. We conclude by amplifying the call of Black women anthropologists and our kinfolk interlocutors that when we come to our ethnographic work, physically, intellectually, and relationally, that we also “come correct.”</p>","PeriodicalId":73022,"journal":{"name":"Feminist anthropology","volume":"4 1","pages":"54-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fea2.12102","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fea2.12102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This methodological reflection invokes the legacy of Black women anthropologists, who have approached ethnography not as encounters with “The Other” but as part of African Diasporic projects. As two U.S. Black women ethnographers, who understand our fieldwork contexts in West Africa as sites of return, re-discovery, and struggle, we situate our work within Black feminist genealogies, which refashion anthropological tools to re-map and reconstitute relations and recognition amongst those we call our kinfolk. We draw on “co-performative witnessing” (Madison 2007) and “mutual comradeship” (Burden-Stelly 2018) as counter-modalities of ethnographic praxis, which follow in this tradition of disrupting and re-routing the disciplinarily legitimized stakes of ethnography. Specifically, we re-narrate gatherings, by which we mean moments of being “gathered,” or collected and corrected in love. Within our respective “itineraries of discovery” (Walker 2015) in Liberia and Nigeria, we were confronted with dilemmas of personal and professional benefit in youth performance ethnography and challenged to relinquish political neutrality in activist ethnography. We conclude by amplifying the call of Black women anthropologists and our kinfolk interlocutors that when we come to our ethnographic work, physically, intellectually, and relationally, that we also “come correct.”

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正确:黑人女性民族志实践中的发现之旅
这种方法上的反思唤起了黑人女性人类学家的遗产,她们不是作为与“他者”的相遇,而是作为非洲流散项目的一部分来接近民族志。作为两名美国黑人女性民族学家,她们将我们在西非的田野调查背景理解为回归,重新发现和斗争的场所,我们将我们的工作置于黑人女权主义谱系中,这重塑了人类学工具,重新绘制和重建了我们所谓的亲属之间的关系和认可。我们借鉴了“共同行为见证”(Madison 2007)和“相互同志关系”(Burden-Stelly 2018)作为民族志实践的反模式,它们遵循了这种传统,即破坏和重新安排民族志学科上合法化的利害关系。具体来说,我们重新叙述聚会,我们指的是被“聚集”的时刻,或者在爱中被收集和纠正的时刻。在我们各自在利比里亚和尼日利亚的“发现之旅”(Walker 2015)中,我们在青年表演人种学中面临着个人和专业利益的困境,并面临着在激进人种学中放弃政治中立的挑战。我们通过放大黑人女性人类学家和我们的亲属对话者的呼吁得出结论,即当我们从事民族志工作时,无论是身体上、智力上还是关系上,我们都要“纠正过来”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Finding Wang Tonghui: The life and after‐life of a pioneer female Chinese anthropologist Gender violence, emotion, and the state symposium commentary The politics of emotion and domestic violence in northern Vietnam Introduction to the gender violence, emotion, and the state symposium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1