Behaviour of eccentrically inclined loaded rectangular foundation on reinforced sand

IF 0.7 Q4 MECHANICS Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.2478/sgem-2021-0003
Sujata Gupta, Anupam Mital
{"title":"Behaviour of eccentrically inclined loaded rectangular foundation on reinforced sand","authors":"Sujata Gupta, Anupam Mital","doi":"10.2478/sgem-2021-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study presents the behaviour of model footing resting over unreinforced and reinforced sand bed under different loading conditions carried out experimentally. The parameters investigated in this study includes the number of reinforced layers (N = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4), embedment ratio (Df/B = 0, 0.5, 1.0), eccentric and inclined ratio (e/L, e/B = 0, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15) and (a = 0°, 7°, 14°). The test sand was reinforced with bi-axial geogrid (Bx20/20). The test results show that the ultimate bearing capacities decrease with axial eccentricity and inclination of applied loads. The test results also show that the depth of model footing increase zero to B (B = width of model footing), an increase of ultimate bearing capacity (UBC) approximated at 93%. Similarly, the multi-layered geogrid reinforced sand (N = 0 to 4) increases the UBC by about 75%. The bearing capacity ratio (BCR) of the model footing increases with an increasing load eccentricity to the core boundary of footing; if the load eccentricities increase continuity, the BCR decreases. The tilt of the model footing is increased by increasing the eccentricity and decreases with increasing the number of reinforcing layers.","PeriodicalId":44626,"journal":{"name":"Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica","volume":"43 1","pages":"74 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2021-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This study presents the behaviour of model footing resting over unreinforced and reinforced sand bed under different loading conditions carried out experimentally. The parameters investigated in this study includes the number of reinforced layers (N = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4), embedment ratio (Df/B = 0, 0.5, 1.0), eccentric and inclined ratio (e/L, e/B = 0, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15) and (a = 0°, 7°, 14°). The test sand was reinforced with bi-axial geogrid (Bx20/20). The test results show that the ultimate bearing capacities decrease with axial eccentricity and inclination of applied loads. The test results also show that the depth of model footing increase zero to B (B = width of model footing), an increase of ultimate bearing capacity (UBC) approximated at 93%. Similarly, the multi-layered geogrid reinforced sand (N = 0 to 4) increases the UBC by about 75%. The bearing capacity ratio (BCR) of the model footing increases with an increasing load eccentricity to the core boundary of footing; if the load eccentricities increase continuity, the BCR decreases. The tilt of the model footing is increased by increasing the eccentricity and decreases with increasing the number of reinforcing layers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加筋砂土上偏心倾斜加载矩形基础的特性
摘要本研究介绍了在不同荷载条件下,无筋和加筋砂床上的模型基脚的试验性能。本研究中研究的参数包括加强层的数量(N=0、1、2、3、4)、埋置比(Df/B=0、0.5、1.0)、偏心和倾斜比(e/L、e/B=0、0.05、0.10、0.15)和(a=0°、7°、14°)。试验砂采用双轴土工格栅(Bx20/20)进行加固。试验结果表明,极限承载力随轴向偏心率和外加荷载的倾斜度而降低。试验结果还表明,模型基脚的深度从零增加到B(B=模型基脚的宽度),极限承载力(UBC)的增加约为93%。类似地,多层土工格栅加筋砂(N=0至4)使UBC增加约75%。模型基脚的承载力比(BCR)随着基脚核心边界荷载偏心率的增加而增加;如果负载偏心度增加了连续性,BCR就会降低。模型基脚的倾斜度随着偏心率的增加而增加,随着加强层数量的增加而减小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international journal ‘Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica’ covers new developments in the broad areas of geomechanics as well as structural mechanics. The journal welcomes contributions dealing with original theoretical, numerical as well as experimental work. The following topics are of special interest: Constitutive relations for geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, etc.) Modeling of mechanical behaviour of heterogeneous materials at different scales Analysis of coupled thermo-hydro-chemo-mechanical problems Modeling of instabilities and localized deformation Experimental investigations of material properties at different scales Numerical algorithms: formulation and performance Application of numerical techniques to analysis of problems involving foundations, underground structures, slopes and embankment Risk and reliability analysis Analysis of concrete and masonry structures Modeling of case histories
期刊最新文献
Correlation between Cone Penetration Test parameters, soil type, and soil liquidity index using long short-term memory neural network Second-order effects in horizontally loaded reinforced concrete columns The Use of CPTU and DMT Methods to Determine Soil Deformation Moduli—Perspectives and Limitations Quality requirements for static liquefaction test of soil in triaxial apparatus Application of Clay–rubber Mixtures for the Transportation Geotechnics—the Numerical Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1