Agenda Setting Penyebaran Hoaks di Media Sosial

Christiany Juditha
{"title":"Agenda Setting Penyebaran Hoaks di Media Sosial","authors":"Christiany Juditha","doi":"10.20422/jpk.v22i2.669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to get an overview of the agenda-setting for the spread of hoax on social media. The method used is quantitative content analysis. The results found that there were three themes of the most prominent hoax issues, namely politics, health, and governance issues. In this case, the media setting agenda on hoax was formed by the users of social media itself. Hoax themes about politics such as Elections have increased in a certain period because social media users or netizens have relatively the same concentration and attention about it. There have also been attempts by certain parties to neutralize a theme hoax for a specific purpose, such as to overthrow each presidential candidate who is fighting in the Election process, including to topple incumbent presidential candidates who are still in power. Likewise, with a content hoax, the media agenda formed on social media represents the interests of netizens. Even in health hoax content that includes the most hoax content, the agenda of social media settings is built because netizens consider the content important to be immediately known by other audiences regardless of whether or not the content is true.","PeriodicalId":30988,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi","volume":"22 1","pages":"155-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20422/jpk.v22i2.669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to get an overview of the agenda-setting for the spread of hoax on social media. The method used is quantitative content analysis. The results found that there were three themes of the most prominent hoax issues, namely politics, health, and governance issues. In this case, the media setting agenda on hoax was formed by the users of social media itself. Hoax themes about politics such as Elections have increased in a certain period because social media users or netizens have relatively the same concentration and attention about it. There have also been attempts by certain parties to neutralize a theme hoax for a specific purpose, such as to overthrow each presidential candidate who is fighting in the Election process, including to topple incumbent presidential candidates who are still in power. Likewise, with a content hoax, the media agenda formed on social media represents the interests of netizens. Even in health hoax content that includes the most hoax content, the agenda of social media settings is built because netizens consider the content important to be immediately known by other audiences regardless of whether or not the content is true.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体活动分布设置议程
本研究的目的是概述恶作剧在社交媒体上传播的议程设置。所使用的方法是定量含量分析。结果发现,最突出的恶作剧问题有三个主题,即政治、健康和治理问题。在这种情况下,关于恶作剧的媒体设置议程是由社交媒体用户自己形成的。在一段时间内,由于社交媒体用户或网民对选举的关注度和集中度相对相同,选举等政治主题的恶作剧有所增加。某些政党也试图为了特定目的压制主题恶作剧,例如推翻每一位在选举过程中战斗的总统候选人,包括推翻仍在执政的现任总统候选人。同样,在社交媒体上形成的媒体议程也代表了网民的利益。即使在包含最多恶作剧内容的健康恶作剧内容中,社交媒体设置的议程也是建立起来的,因为网民认为这些内容很重要,无论内容是否真实,都要立即被其他观众所知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Quality of Public Information on Twitter: Yogyakarta And DKI Jakarta Regional Government Comparison Netiquette Analysis of Youtube Content in The Covid-19 Pandemic Representation of Micro Nationalism in Social Media: A Problem for Indonesia as “Imagined Community” Video Conferencing Conducted by Public Relations During The Covid-19 Pandemic through The Lens Of Journalists Digital Movement of Opinion #IndonesiaTerserah on Social Media Twitter in The Covid-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1