Two-body wear resistance and fatigue survival of new Y-TZP and ATZ ceramics made with a new slip-casting method.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Dental zirconium oxide restorations are milled from pre-sintered blocks or disks which are produced either with high isostatic pressure (HIP) or, simpler, a slurry technique. The objective was to perform a fatigue test and an in vitro wear simulation of two ceramics, yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (3Y-TZP) ceramic and a hybrid zirconium oxide-aluminum oxide ceramic, (ATZ) both produced either the classical way using high isostatic pressure (HIP, control) or with a slurry technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten discs/group were subjected to a cyclic biaxial fatigue test using a staircase approach under water at 37 °C in a dynamic universal testing machine. The 2-body wear test was performed on eight lapped 12 mm thick cylindrical samples subjected to spherical (ø 6 mm) leucite ceramic antagonists in a CS-4 chewing simulator at 49 N force and 0.7 mm lateral movement for 600 k cycles and 4167 thermal cycles (5-55 °C). Volumetric wear was calculated based on laser-scanned surfaces. Selected samples of both tests were viewed in SEM. RESULTS All the ceramic specimens produced using the HIP method survived up to 1.2 M cycles with the maximum load of the equipment (1000 N) loading the specimens up to 1527 MPa. The fatigue limit stress at 1.2 M cycles for the Slurry ATZ samples was 946 MPa. For the Slurry Y-TZP samples the fatigue limit stress at 1.2 M cycles was 658 MPa. At 600 k cycles, all zirconium oxide ceramics showed no measurable wear and had a highly polished appearance. The leucite ceramic antagonists wear developed in a linear way. There was no difference between the materials produced with the slurry and the HIP process. ATZ ceramic produced significantly more wear than 3Y- TZP ceramic. CONCLUSIONS The HIP method provided higher fatigue strength than the Slurry manufacturing method. All HIP ceramics surpassed the limit threshold (1527 MPa) of the testing machine. The tested ceramics did not show any measurable wear but had worn the leucite reinforced glass ceramic antagonists for a considerable amount.