“As Great a Nuisance as the Garbage Itself”: Race, Power, and the Question of Waste Management in Portland, Oregon, 1871–1905

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY OREGON HISTORICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1353/ohq.2022.0046
A. Kirkpatrick
{"title":"“As Great a Nuisance as the Garbage Itself”: Race, Power, and the Question of Waste Management in Portland, Oregon, 1871–1905","authors":"A. Kirkpatrick","doi":"10.1353/ohq.2022.0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:At the end of the nineteenth century, Portland, Oregon, was struggling to adequately collect and dispose of the refuse being produced by its rapidly growing population and industries. City officials sought to exert greater municipal control over Portland’s waste management system by funding the construction and operation of garbage crematories and bypassing ordinances to control the collection, movement, and disposal of waste. These measures, however, did not solve the city’s garbage problem. Examining Portland’s early history of waste management reveals a municipal government struggling to deal with the material effects of urbanization and industrialization. This study also looks at the ways that anti-Chinese racism shaped the city’s waste management system. From characterizing both Chinese residents and unincinerated garbage as legal nuisances to attempting to prohibit them from employment as street cleaners, it is evident that Portland’s anti-Chinese and urban sanitation movements overlapped and, when viewed together, reveal early examples of environmental racism.","PeriodicalId":43111,"journal":{"name":"OREGON HISTORICAL QUARTERLY","volume":"123 1","pages":"358 - 389"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OREGON HISTORICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ohq.2022.0046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:At the end of the nineteenth century, Portland, Oregon, was struggling to adequately collect and dispose of the refuse being produced by its rapidly growing population and industries. City officials sought to exert greater municipal control over Portland’s waste management system by funding the construction and operation of garbage crematories and bypassing ordinances to control the collection, movement, and disposal of waste. These measures, however, did not solve the city’s garbage problem. Examining Portland’s early history of waste management reveals a municipal government struggling to deal with the material effects of urbanization and industrialization. This study also looks at the ways that anti-Chinese racism shaped the city’s waste management system. From characterizing both Chinese residents and unincinerated garbage as legal nuisances to attempting to prohibit them from employment as street cleaners, it is evident that Portland’s anti-Chinese and urban sanitation movements overlapped and, when viewed together, reveal early examples of environmental racism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“像垃圾本身一样令人讨厌”:种族、权力和俄勒冈州波特兰的废物管理问题,1871-1905
摘要:19世纪末,俄勒冈州波特兰市正努力充分收集和处理其快速增长的人口和工业产生的垃圾。市政府官员试图通过资助垃圾火葬场的建设和运营,并绕过条例来控制废物的收集、移动和处置,来加强市政府对波特兰废物管理系统的控制。然而,这些措施并没有解决该市的垃圾问题。研究波特兰早期的废物管理历史,可以发现市政府正在努力应对城市化和工业化的物质影响。这项研究还考察了反华种族主义如何塑造了该市的废物管理系统。从将中国居民和未经处理的垃圾定性为合法滋扰,到试图禁止他们受雇于街道清洁工,波特兰的反华运动和城市卫生运动显然是重叠的,如果放在一起看,可以发现环境种族主义的早期例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The Oregon Historical Quarterly, a peer-reviewed, public history journal, has been published continuously since 1900 by the Oregon Historical Society, an independent, nonprofit organization. OHQ brings well-researched, well-written history about Oregon and the Pacific Northwest to both scholars and a general audience. With a circulation of around 5,500, OHQ is one of the largest state historical society journals in the United States and is a recognized and respected source for the history of the Pacific Northwest region.
期刊最新文献
The Jackson County Rebellion: A Populist Uprising in Depression-Era Oregon by Jeffrey Max LaLande (review) Portland in Three Centuries: The Place and People (Second Edition) by Carl Abbott (review) Improving Public Memory: Discovering the Chinese Community of Early Klamath Falls Dangerous Ground: Squatters, Statesmen, And The Antebellum Rupture of American Democracy by John Suval Mark O. Hatfield: Oregon Statesman by Richard W. Etulain (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1