Communicating on social media during a #FestivalEmergency

IF 2.2 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Journal of Event and Festival Management Pub Date : 2021-12-29 DOI:10.1108/ijefm-06-2021-0054
Christine M. Van Winkle, Shawn Corrigan
{"title":"Communicating on social media during a #FestivalEmergency","authors":"Christine M. Van Winkle, Shawn Corrigan","doi":"10.1108/ijefm-06-2021-0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of the study was to explore multidirectional flows of information over the course of an emergency. The following research questions were designed to guide this study: How does social media communication unfold over the course of an emergency at a cultural event? How does the nature and purpose of social media communication between all SM users change once an emergency occurs that affects event operations? How does the sentiment of social media communication change once an emergency occurs that affects event operations?Design/methodology/approachThis study explored how social media was used to communicate about on-site emergencies at community cultural events. Three events were studied before, during and after an on-site emergency that disrupted the event. The Twitter and Facebook posts referencing emergencies that took place at Shambhala, Detonate and Zombicon were explored, and the nature and purpose of the posts revealed how online communication changed throughout the emergencies. The Social Mediated Crisis Communication Model guided this research and findings contribute to the model's ongoing development by incorporating additional theories and models.FindingsThe research demonstrates that social media communication shifts during an emergency and how communication moves through a network changes. Once an emergency is underway, communication increases and who is talking with whom changes. The nature and purpose of the social media conversation also evolves over the course of an emergency.Research limitations/implicationsThis study examined the social media communication during three on-site emergencies at three different cultural events. The findings contribute to the understanding of the Social Media Crisis Communication Model. Specifically, the research confirms the various actors who engage online but also shows that two-way communication is not common. As this study only examined three events experiencing three different emergencies, we have a limited understanding of how the type of emergencies affects social media communication.Practical implicationsThe findings show the need for pre-crisis work by event organizers. It is necessary for the events to build trust with their online communities to ensure that when an emergency occurs the event will be seen as a trusted source. Also, staff training is needed to ensure people are prepared to handle the complexities of communicating online during an emergency. Issues like misinformation, influencers and the rapid pace of social media communication create a challenging environment for staff who are unprepared.Originality/valueEmergencies can threaten the survival of event organizations and put the health and wellness of attendees, staff and other stakeholders at risk. The study of crisis communication in special event contexts has received little theoretical attention and yet it is an important area of event management practice. Social media is an essential part of communication strategies and should be integrated into emergency planning to best reach people when an emergency threatens the safety of those involved with the event. The Social Media Crisis Communication Model offers some insight, but understanding its relevance is necessary if it is to be integrated into event emergency management.","PeriodicalId":46446,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Event and Festival Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Event and Festival Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijefm-06-2021-0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the study was to explore multidirectional flows of information over the course of an emergency. The following research questions were designed to guide this study: How does social media communication unfold over the course of an emergency at a cultural event? How does the nature and purpose of social media communication between all SM users change once an emergency occurs that affects event operations? How does the sentiment of social media communication change once an emergency occurs that affects event operations?Design/methodology/approachThis study explored how social media was used to communicate about on-site emergencies at community cultural events. Three events were studied before, during and after an on-site emergency that disrupted the event. The Twitter and Facebook posts referencing emergencies that took place at Shambhala, Detonate and Zombicon were explored, and the nature and purpose of the posts revealed how online communication changed throughout the emergencies. The Social Mediated Crisis Communication Model guided this research and findings contribute to the model's ongoing development by incorporating additional theories and models.FindingsThe research demonstrates that social media communication shifts during an emergency and how communication moves through a network changes. Once an emergency is underway, communication increases and who is talking with whom changes. The nature and purpose of the social media conversation also evolves over the course of an emergency.Research limitations/implicationsThis study examined the social media communication during three on-site emergencies at three different cultural events. The findings contribute to the understanding of the Social Media Crisis Communication Model. Specifically, the research confirms the various actors who engage online but also shows that two-way communication is not common. As this study only examined three events experiencing three different emergencies, we have a limited understanding of how the type of emergencies affects social media communication.Practical implicationsThe findings show the need for pre-crisis work by event organizers. It is necessary for the events to build trust with their online communities to ensure that when an emergency occurs the event will be seen as a trusted source. Also, staff training is needed to ensure people are prepared to handle the complexities of communicating online during an emergency. Issues like misinformation, influencers and the rapid pace of social media communication create a challenging environment for staff who are unprepared.Originality/valueEmergencies can threaten the survival of event organizations and put the health and wellness of attendees, staff and other stakeholders at risk. The study of crisis communication in special event contexts has received little theoretical attention and yet it is an important area of event management practice. Social media is an essential part of communication strategies and should be integrated into emergency planning to best reach people when an emergency threatens the safety of those involved with the event. The Social Media Crisis Communication Model offers some insight, but understanding its relevance is necessary if it is to be integrated into event emergency management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
#FestivalEmergency期间在社交媒体上交流
目的本研究的目的是探索紧急情况下信息的多向流动。以下研究问题旨在指导这项研究:在文化活动的紧急情况下,社交媒体传播是如何展开的?一旦发生影响事件运营的紧急情况,所有SM用户之间社交媒体交流的性质和目的会发生怎样的变化?一旦发生影响活动运营的紧急情况,社交媒体传播的情绪会发生怎样的变化?设计/方法/方法本研究探讨了在社区文化活动中如何使用社交媒体来沟通现场紧急情况。在现场紧急情况扰乱活动之前、期间和之后,对三起事件进行了研究。推特和脸书上关于香巴拉、引爆和僵尸洞发生的紧急情况的帖子被探究,这些帖子的性质和目的揭示了在线交流在整个紧急情况下是如何变化的。社会中介危机沟通模型指导了这项研究,研究结果通过结合其他理论和模型,为该模型的持续发展做出了贡献。研究结果表明,在紧急情况下,社交媒体的沟通会发生变化,网络中的沟通方式也会发生变化。一旦紧急情况发生,沟通就会增加,与谁交谈会发生变化。社交媒体对话的性质和目的也随着紧急情况的发生而变化。研究局限性/含义本研究考察了三种不同文化活动中三种现场紧急情况下的社交媒体传播。研究结果有助于理解社交媒体危机传播模型。具体而言,这项研究证实了参与网络活动的各种参与者,但也表明双向交流并不常见。由于这项研究只考察了经历三种不同紧急情况的三个事件,我们对这种类型的紧急情况如何影响社交媒体传播的了解有限。实际意义研究结果表明,活动组织者有必要在危机前开展工作。事件有必要与其在线社区建立信任,以确保在紧急情况发生时,事件将被视为可信来源。此外,还需要对员工进行培训,以确保人们做好准备,应对紧急情况下在线沟通的复杂性。错误信息、影响者和社交媒体快速传播等问题为毫无准备的员工创造了一个充满挑战的环境。创意/价值紧急情况可能威胁到活动组织的生存,并使与会者、工作人员和其他利益相关者的健康面临风险。特殊事件背景下的危机沟通研究在理论上很少受到关注,但却是事件管理实践的一个重要领域。社交媒体是沟通策略的重要组成部分,应纳入应急计划,以便在紧急情况威胁到参与活动人员的安全时,最好地接触到人们。社交媒体危机沟通模型提供了一些见解,但如果要将其纳入事件应急管理,了解其相关性是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Event and Festival Management
International Journal of Event and Festival Management HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
13.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Event and Festival Management advances knowledge in the field of events management and enhances the uptake of such knowledge by academics in the field. The double-blind peer-reviewed journal will cover events management issues ranging in scope from small festivals, business and special events to mega events such as the Olympics. Articles will be sourced from all disciplinary perspectives and a multi-disciplinary research approach is encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Does hosting FIFA World Cup attract inward FDI? An empirical investigation using sectoral panel data of 12 countries University students' participation in campus-based events Leveraging para sport events to create para sport legacies: a case study of the world para snow sport championship 2021 Harmonizing visiting performers' motivations and community revitalization at a rural island music festival Attendees' experiences of anime conventions in the United States: a netnography study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1