Development and Validation of Coronavirus Disease 2019-Induced Perceived Stigmatization in Physicians Scale.

IF 1.3 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Alpha psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2023.221038
Muhammed Fatih Önsüz, Didem Oktar, Sevil Aydoğan Gedik, Sevda Sungur, Selma Metintaş, Ferdi Köşger, Ali Ercan Altınöz
{"title":"Development and Validation of Coronavirus Disease 2019-Induced Perceived Stigmatization in Physicians Scale.","authors":"Muhammed Fatih Önsüz, Didem Oktar, Sevil Aydoğan Gedik, Sevda Sungur, Selma Metintaş, Ferdi Köşger, Ali Ercan Altınöz","doi":"10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2023.221038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is well-established that healthcare professionals are stigmatized by the society during infectious disease outbreaks. The present study aimed to develop a scale to measure the coronavirus disease 2019-induced perceived stigmatization in physicians and investigate its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present methodological type of study was carried out with 303 physicians working with a university hospital. The researchers drafted a 5-point Likert-type \"Coronavirus Disease 2019-Induced Perceived Stigmatization in Physicians Scale\" by using an item pool consisting of 35 items upon a review of the relevant literature. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient), item-total correlation coefficient, and test-retest analyses were used to assess the reliability of the scale. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed with an aim to evaluate the construct validity of the scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scale consisted of 10 items and 2 domains (environmental perceived stigmatization and personally perceived stigmatization) upon completion of the scale development step. The items on the scale explained 61.66% of the total variance, where the factor loads were between 0.66 and 0.85. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.88, and the item-total correlation coefficients were all above 0.3. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the resultant model had goodness-of-fit indices with sufficient fit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Coronavirus Disease 2019-Induced Perceived Stigmatization in Physicians Scale was a reliable and valid tool for the physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":72151,"journal":{"name":"Alpha psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645135/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2023.221038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is well-established that healthcare professionals are stigmatized by the society during infectious disease outbreaks. The present study aimed to develop a scale to measure the coronavirus disease 2019-induced perceived stigmatization in physicians and investigate its validity and reliability.

Methods: The present methodological type of study was carried out with 303 physicians working with a university hospital. The researchers drafted a 5-point Likert-type "Coronavirus Disease 2019-Induced Perceived Stigmatization in Physicians Scale" by using an item pool consisting of 35 items upon a review of the relevant literature. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient), item-total correlation coefficient, and test-retest analyses were used to assess the reliability of the scale. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed with an aim to evaluate the construct validity of the scale.

Results: The scale consisted of 10 items and 2 domains (environmental perceived stigmatization and personally perceived stigmatization) upon completion of the scale development step. The items on the scale explained 61.66% of the total variance, where the factor loads were between 0.66 and 0.85. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.88, and the item-total correlation coefficients were all above 0.3. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the resultant model had goodness-of-fit indices with sufficient fit.

Conclusion: The Coronavirus Disease 2019-Induced Perceived Stigmatization in Physicians Scale was a reliable and valid tool for the physicians.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病引起的医生感知污名化量表的开发与验证
背景:众所周知,在传染病暴发期间,卫生保健专业人员受到社会的污名化。本研究旨在制定一个量表来衡量2019年冠状病毒病引起的医生感知污名化,并调查其效度和可靠性。方法:采用方法学方法对某大学附属医院的303名医生进行调查。研究人员在查阅相关文献的基础上,利用35个项目的题库,编制了李克特式的5分“2019冠状病毒病引起的医生感知污名化量表”。采用内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha系数)、项目-总量相关系数和重测分析来评估量表的信度。进行探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析,以评估量表的构念效度。结果:完成量表编制步骤后,量表包括环境污名化感知和个人污名化感知两个领域的10个题项。量表上的项目解释了总方差的61.66%,其中因子负荷在0.66 ~ 0.85之间。量表的Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.88,项目-总量相关系数均在0.3以上。经验证性因子分析,所得模型具有足够的拟合优度指标。结论:《2019冠状病毒病医生污名化感知量表》是一种可靠、有效的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advances in Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder. Antisocial Behavior and Antisocial Personality Disorder Among Youth in Ethnic Minority Areas in China: A Cross-sectional Study. Anxiety and Depression after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes. Broader Open Data Needed in Psychiatry: Practice from the Psychology and Behavior Investigation of Chinese Residents. Carotid Intima-media Thickness, Arterial Stiffness and Depression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1