Atlantic Spotted and Bottlenose Dolphin Sympatric Distribution in Nearshore Waters Off Bimini, The Bahamas, 2003–2018

IF 0.5 4区 生物学 Q4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Caribbean Journal of Science Pub Date : 2022-09-12 DOI:10.18475/cjos.v52i2.a3
A. Levengood, Kelly Melillo-Sweeting, C. Ribic, A. J. Beck, K. Dudzinski
{"title":"Atlantic Spotted and Bottlenose Dolphin Sympatric Distribution in Nearshore Waters Off Bimini, The Bahamas, 2003–2018","authors":"A. Levengood, Kelly Melillo-Sweeting, C. Ribic, A. J. Beck, K. Dudzinski","doi":"10.18475/cjos.v52i2.a3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Within nearshore waters off Bimini, The Bahamas, Atlantic spotted (Stenella frontalis) and common bottlenose (Tursiops truncatus) dolphins are sympatric but separated spatially in different geographic areas and water depth ranges. Afternoon surveys during summer months across a 16-year period showed S. frontalis used the northern part of the nearshore area more, while T. truncatus used the southern area more. Generally, examination of geographic zones and water depth distributions of both species before and after construction of a pier in the study area suggested these dolphins were not impacted, long-term, by this anthropogenic activity. Still some differences in use of the nearshore area were identified. For water depth, S. frontalis varied use between 5–<12 m and 12–<20 m, depending on location along the coast. In contrast, T. truncatus consistently used the 5–<12 m depths. This difference may be related to how each species used the nearshore area, with T. truncatus feeding more and S. frontalis travelling and doing other activities. A small change in the distribution of S. frontalis by water depth off the northern coast of Bimini was found, specifically an increased use of deeper (12–20 m) water post 2014, which is unlikely an effect of pier construction as S. frontalis continued to use the 5–12 m depths as they had before pier construction. How this change might be related to an unprecedented 2013 S. frontalis immigration event, which might have disrupted the social structure, habitat/resource use, and distribution of both species, is discussed.","PeriodicalId":55274,"journal":{"name":"Caribbean Journal of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caribbean Journal of Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18475/cjos.v52i2.a3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Within nearshore waters off Bimini, The Bahamas, Atlantic spotted (Stenella frontalis) and common bottlenose (Tursiops truncatus) dolphins are sympatric but separated spatially in different geographic areas and water depth ranges. Afternoon surveys during summer months across a 16-year period showed S. frontalis used the northern part of the nearshore area more, while T. truncatus used the southern area more. Generally, examination of geographic zones and water depth distributions of both species before and after construction of a pier in the study area suggested these dolphins were not impacted, long-term, by this anthropogenic activity. Still some differences in use of the nearshore area were identified. For water depth, S. frontalis varied use between 5–<12 m and 12–<20 m, depending on location along the coast. In contrast, T. truncatus consistently used the 5–<12 m depths. This difference may be related to how each species used the nearshore area, with T. truncatus feeding more and S. frontalis travelling and doing other activities. A small change in the distribution of S. frontalis by water depth off the northern coast of Bimini was found, specifically an increased use of deeper (12–20 m) water post 2014, which is unlikely an effect of pier construction as S. frontalis continued to use the 5–12 m depths as they had before pier construction. How this change might be related to an unprecedented 2013 S. frontalis immigration event, which might have disrupted the social structure, habitat/resource use, and distribution of both species, is discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2003-2018年,巴哈马比米尼近岸水域大西洋斑点海豚和宽吻海豚的同域分布
摘要在巴哈马比米尼附近的近海水域,大西洋斑海豚(Stenella frontalis)和普通宽吻海豚(Tursiops truncatus)是同域的,但在不同的地理区域和水深范围内空间上是分开的。在16年的夏季几个月里,下午的调查显示,S.frontalis更多地使用近岸地区的北部,而T.truncatus更多地使用南部地区。一般来说,在研究区域修建码头前后对这两个物种的地理区域和水深分布进行的检查表明,这些海豚没有受到这种人为活动的长期影响。在近岸区域的使用方面仍然存在一些差异。对于水深,根据海岸沿线的位置,S.frontalis的使用在5–<12 m和12–<20 m之间有所不同。与此相反,截骨T.truncatus一直使用5-<12m的深度。这种差异可能与每个物种如何使用近岸区域有关,截断T.truncatus进食更多,额滨S.frontalis旅行和从事其他活动。比米尼北部海岸的S.frontalis在水深方面的分布略有变化,特别是2014年后更深(12-20米)水域的使用量增加,这不太可能是码头施工的影响,因为S.frontali继续使用码头施工前的5-12米深度。讨论了这一变化可能与2013年一次前所未有的前脸S.frontalis移民事件有关,该事件可能扰乱了这两个物种的社会结构、栖息地/资源使用和分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Caribbean Journal of Science
Caribbean Journal of Science 综合性期刊-生物多样性保护
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Caribbean Journal of Science publishes articles, research notes, and book reviews pertinent to natural science of the Caribbean region. The emphasis is on botany, zoology, ecology, conservation biology and management, geology, archaeology, and paleontology. The mission as a nonprofit scholarly journal is to publish quality, peer-reviewed papers and to make them widely available.
期刊最新文献
Another Chromatic Aberration in the Clay-colored Thrush, Turdus grayi (Passeriformes – Turdidae) Swampy, King of the Swampers (Ctenosaura bakeri Stejneger, 1901) First Records of Spiders in the Genus Micrathena (Araneae: Araneidae) from The Bahamas Does an Enabling Policy Environment Exist to Manage the Cross-Sectoral “Monkey Problems” of St. Kitts? Predation of a Yates Coral Snake, Micrurus yatesi Taylor, 1954 by a Brown Basilisk, Basiliscus basiliscus (Linnaeus, 1758)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1