Reducing Efficiencies of the Commonly Used Heat Treatment Methods and Fermentation Processes on Aflatoxin M1 in Naturally Contaminated Fresh Cow Milk

G. Omeiza, M. Mwanza, S. Enem, E. Godwin, M. A. Adeiza, C. E. Okoli
{"title":"Reducing Efficiencies of the Commonly Used Heat Treatment Methods and Fermentation Processes on Aflatoxin M1 in Naturally Contaminated Fresh Cow Milk","authors":"G. Omeiza, M. Mwanza, S. Enem, E. Godwin, M. A. Adeiza, C. E. Okoli","doi":"10.4236/OJVM.2018.88013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reducing efficiencies of the commonly used heat treatment methods and fermentation processes on aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) in Nigeria were investigated. Seventy samples of fresh cow milk from both conventional and traditional dairy cattle herds were collected and analyzed for the determination of AFM1 using Cobra-cell incorporated high performance liquid chromatography. Of these analyzed samples, 56 (80.0%) tested positive for AFM1 out of which 3 milk samples with high AFM1 concentrations were selectively pooled and subjected to varied conditions of heat treatments and fermentation processes using both indigenized and exotic strains of lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus bulgaricus + Streptococcus thermophilus and L. rhamnosus and L. plantarum) as starter cultures respectively. Both processes used either singly or combined, demonstrated high degrees of reducing effects on AFM1 levels. Sterilization of the milk at 121˚C and 80˚C under the same condition of time (15 - 20) min showed significant reduction of up to 58.8% (p 0.05) in the level of AFM1 when compared with the initial mean AFM1 concentration of the untreated fresh milk. The situation was however different around the boiling temperature of 100˚C at which point the level of AFM1 reduction was found to be inconsistent. The indigenized combined strains showed some slight margins of AFM1 reduction in the proportions of (20.5, 30.8 and 43.9)% over and above that of the exotic strains (17.4, 30.0 and 41.1)% in 12 h, 48 h and 72 h of fermentation respectively. Generally, fermentation alone showed lower reduction of AFM1 in milk from 24.5% to 43.9% compared with the reducing activities of (35.4 to 58.8)% when heat-treated milk samples were subsequently subjected to varied fermentation conditions.","PeriodicalId":61886,"journal":{"name":"兽医学(英文)","volume":"08 1","pages":"134-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"兽医学(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJVM.2018.88013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The reducing efficiencies of the commonly used heat treatment methods and fermentation processes on aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) in Nigeria were investigated. Seventy samples of fresh cow milk from both conventional and traditional dairy cattle herds were collected and analyzed for the determination of AFM1 using Cobra-cell incorporated high performance liquid chromatography. Of these analyzed samples, 56 (80.0%) tested positive for AFM1 out of which 3 milk samples with high AFM1 concentrations were selectively pooled and subjected to varied conditions of heat treatments and fermentation processes using both indigenized and exotic strains of lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus bulgaricus + Streptococcus thermophilus and L. rhamnosus and L. plantarum) as starter cultures respectively. Both processes used either singly or combined, demonstrated high degrees of reducing effects on AFM1 levels. Sterilization of the milk at 121˚C and 80˚C under the same condition of time (15 - 20) min showed significant reduction of up to 58.8% (p 0.05) in the level of AFM1 when compared with the initial mean AFM1 concentration of the untreated fresh milk. The situation was however different around the boiling temperature of 100˚C at which point the level of AFM1 reduction was found to be inconsistent. The indigenized combined strains showed some slight margins of AFM1 reduction in the proportions of (20.5, 30.8 and 43.9)% over and above that of the exotic strains (17.4, 30.0 and 41.1)% in 12 h, 48 h and 72 h of fermentation respectively. Generally, fermentation alone showed lower reduction of AFM1 in milk from 24.5% to 43.9% compared with the reducing activities of (35.4 to 58.8)% when heat-treated milk samples were subsequently subjected to varied fermentation conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
降低常用热处理方法和发酵工艺对天然污染鲜奶中黄曲霉毒素M1的处理效率
研究了尼日利亚常用的热处理方法和发酵工艺对黄曲霉毒素M1(AFM1)的降低效果。收集了来自传统和传统奶牛群的70份新鲜牛奶样本,并使用Cobra细胞结合高效液相色谱法对其进行分析,以测定AFM1。在这些分析的样品中,56个(80.0%)的AFM1检测呈阳性,其中3个具有高AFM1浓度的牛奶样品被选择性地合并,并分别使用国产和外来乳酸菌菌株(保加利亚乳杆菌+嗜热链球菌和鼠李糖乳杆菌和植物乳杆菌)作为起始培养物进行不同条件的热处理和发酵过程。无论单独使用还是组合使用,这两种工艺都显示出对AFM1水平的高度降低作用。在121˚C和80˚C下,在相同的时间条件下(15-20)分钟对牛奶进行灭菌,与未经处理的新鲜牛奶的初始平均AFM1浓度相比,AFM1水平显著降低了58.8%(p 0.05)。然而,在100˚C的沸腾温度附近,情况有所不同,在该温度下,发现AFM1还原水平不一致。在12小时、48小时和72小时的发酵过程中,国产化的组合菌株表现出AFM1的轻微下降幅度,分别为(20.5、30.8和43.9)%,高于外来菌株(17.4、30.0和41.1)%。一般来说,当热处理的牛奶样品随后经受不同的发酵条件时,与(35.4至58.8)%的还原活性相比,单独发酵显示牛奶中AFM1的还原率较低,从24.5%降至43.9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
244
期刊最新文献
Causes and Effects of Stillbirths on Days Open and Cow Herd Survival in Holstein Friesian Cows Effect of a Commercially Available Electrolyte Solution on Acute, Non-Specific Diarrhea in Dogs Anti-Müllerian Hormone and Its Utility in Cattle Reproduction The Effects of Using a Specially Designed Stirrup on Kinetic Energy Absorption by the Knee Joint of 12 Show Jumping/Eventing Riders Development and Validation of an Indirect Whole-Virus ELISA Using a Predominant Genotype VI Velogenic NewCastle Disease Virus Isolated from Lebanese Poultry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1