N. Korotkova, David Aquino, S. Arias, U. Eggli, Alan R. Franck, C. Gómez-Hinostrosa, P. Guerrero, H. Hernández, A. Kohlbecker, M. Köhler, K. Luther, L. Majure, A. Müller, D. Metzing, R. Nyffeler, Daniela Sanchez, B. Schlumpberger, W. Berendsohn
{"title":"Cactaceae at Caryophyllales.org – a dynamic online species-level taxonomic backbone for the family","authors":"N. Korotkova, David Aquino, S. Arias, U. Eggli, Alan R. Franck, C. Gómez-Hinostrosa, P. Guerrero, H. Hernández, A. Kohlbecker, M. Köhler, K. Luther, L. Majure, A. Müller, D. Metzing, R. Nyffeler, Daniela Sanchez, B. Schlumpberger, W. Berendsohn","doi":"10.3372/wi.51.51208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This data paper presents a largely phylogeny-based online taxonomic backbone for the Cactaceae compiled from literature and online sources using the tools of the EDIT Platform for Cybertaxonomy. The data will form a contribution of the Caryophyllales Network for the World Flora Online and serve as the base for further integration of research results from the systematic research community. The final aim is to treat all effectively published scientific names in the family. The checklist includes 150 accepted genera, 1851 accepted species, 91 hybrids, 746 infraspecific taxa (458 heterotypic, 288 with autonyms), 17,932 synonyms of accepted taxa, 16 definitely excluded names, 389 names of uncertain application, 672 unresolved names and 454 names belonging to (probably artificial) named hybrids, totalling 22,275 names. The process of compiling this database is described and further editorial rules for the compilation of the taxonomic backbone for the Caryophyllales Network are proposed. A checklist depicting the current state of the taxonomic backbone is provided as supplemental material. All results are also available online on the website of the Caryophyllales Network and will be constantly updated and expanded in the future. Citation: Korotkova N., Aquino D., Arias S., Eggli U., Franck A., Gómez-Hinostrosa C., Guerrero P. C., Hernández H. M., Kohlbecker A., Köhler M., Luther K., Majure L. C., Müller A., Metzing D., Nyffeler R., Sánchez D., Schlumpberger B. & Berendsohn W. G. 2021: Cactaceae at Caryophyllales.org – a dynamic online species-level taxonomic backbone for the family. – Willdenowia 51: 251–270. Version of record first published online on 31 August 2021 ahead of inclusion in August 2021 issue. Data published through: http://caryophyllales.org/cactaceae/Checklist","PeriodicalId":48969,"journal":{"name":"Willdenowia","volume":"51 1","pages":"251 - 270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Willdenowia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.51.51208","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45
Abstract
Abstract: This data paper presents a largely phylogeny-based online taxonomic backbone for the Cactaceae compiled from literature and online sources using the tools of the EDIT Platform for Cybertaxonomy. The data will form a contribution of the Caryophyllales Network for the World Flora Online and serve as the base for further integration of research results from the systematic research community. The final aim is to treat all effectively published scientific names in the family. The checklist includes 150 accepted genera, 1851 accepted species, 91 hybrids, 746 infraspecific taxa (458 heterotypic, 288 with autonyms), 17,932 synonyms of accepted taxa, 16 definitely excluded names, 389 names of uncertain application, 672 unresolved names and 454 names belonging to (probably artificial) named hybrids, totalling 22,275 names. The process of compiling this database is described and further editorial rules for the compilation of the taxonomic backbone for the Caryophyllales Network are proposed. A checklist depicting the current state of the taxonomic backbone is provided as supplemental material. All results are also available online on the website of the Caryophyllales Network and will be constantly updated and expanded in the future. Citation: Korotkova N., Aquino D., Arias S., Eggli U., Franck A., Gómez-Hinostrosa C., Guerrero P. C., Hernández H. M., Kohlbecker A., Köhler M., Luther K., Majure L. C., Müller A., Metzing D., Nyffeler R., Sánchez D., Schlumpberger B. & Berendsohn W. G. 2021: Cactaceae at Caryophyllales.org – a dynamic online species-level taxonomic backbone for the family. – Willdenowia 51: 251–270. Version of record first published online on 31 August 2021 ahead of inclusion in August 2021 issue. Data published through: http://caryophyllales.org/cactaceae/Checklist
摘要:本文利用网络分类编辑平台(EDIT Platform for Cybertaxonomy)的工具,从文献和在线资源中编制了一个基于系统发育的仙人掌科在线分类主干。这些数据将成为“世界植物网络”的一份贡献,并作为进一步整合系统研究界研究成果的基础。最终目标是处理家族中所有有效发表的学名。该清单包括150个已被认可的属,1851个已被认可的种,91个杂交种,746个种内分类群(458个异型分类群,288个同源分类群),17,932个已被认可的分类群的同义词,16个明确排除的名称,389个应用不确定的名称,672个未被确定的名称和454个属于(可能是人工命名的)杂交种的名称,共计22,275个名称。本文描述了该数据库的编制过程,并提出了进一步编制石竹网络分类主干的编辑规则。作为补充材料,还提供了一份描述分类学主干当前状态的清单。所有的结果也可在颖果网络的网站上在线获取,并将在未来不断更新和扩展。引用本文:Korotkova N, Aquino D, Arias S, Eggli U, Franck A, Gómez-Hinostrosa C, Guerrero P. C, Hernández H. M, Kohlbecker A., Köhler M, Luther K., Majure L. C, m ller A., Metzing D, Nyffeler R., Sánchez D, Schlumpberger B.和Berendsohn W. G. 2021:仙人掌科在Caryophyllales.org的动态网络分类基础。——植物学报51:251-270。记录版本于2021年8月31日首次在网上发布,并于2021年8月被收录。数据发布渠道:http://caryophyllales.org/cactaceae/Checklist
期刊介绍:
Willdenowia is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing original research articles in English from the entire fields of plant, algal and fungal systematics, covering the evolution, taxonomy and nomenclature of these organisms as well as related fields such as floristics and plant geography. Articles on phylogeny and molecular systematics are especially welcome, as are review articles. Descriptions of new taxa may be considered, but only if supported by robust evidence. Narrowly regional studies of widespread taxa, routine typifications, checklists and new floristic records are generally not considered (excluding contributions to the Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae). Authors are encouraged to deposit duplicates of their material, especially nomenclatural types, in the Berlin herbarium (B).