Isometric chin tuck exercise with and without scapular postural correction for patients with chronic neck pain: a longitudinal study

Joon-hyoung Yong, Il-young Moon, Jin-seok Lim, C. Yi
{"title":"Isometric chin tuck exercise with and without scapular postural correction for patients with chronic neck pain: a longitudinal study","authors":"Joon-hyoung Yong, Il-young Moon, Jin-seok Lim, C. Yi","doi":"10.12968/ijtr.2021.0184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic neck pain is common in individuals with poor posture and motor control impairments. There has been increased interest in scapular postural correction in conjunction with the isometric chin tuck exercise. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of scapular postural correction while performing isometric chin tuck exercises for the improvement of neck pain, neck and shoulder alignment and superficial neck muscle activity in patients with chronic neck pain. A total of 32 participants with chronic, non-specific neck pain were randomly divided into two groups (groups A and B, both n=16), who performed isometric chin tuck exercises alone or isometric chin tuck with scapular postural correction respectively. The participants were instructed to perform five sets of the exercise with 10 repetitions for 6 weeks. Measurements were taken pre- and post-intervention to determine Neck Disability Index scores, postural parameters (head, cervical and shoulder angle) and superficial cervical muscle activity (sternocleidomastoid, anterior scalene, splenius capitis). Analysis of covariance was used to compare the post-intervention scores. Significant differences were observed between groups A and B in the cervical angle (F1,29=4.538, P=0.042) and shoulder angle (F1,29=8.357, P=0.007), when compared to baseline values. Both group A (t=12.097, P<0.001) and group B (t=8.032, P<0.001) showed a significant reduction in Neck Disability Index scores compared to baseline scores. Both group A and group B showed a significant decrease in sternocleidomastoid (group A: t=6.637, P<0.001; group B: t=10.143, P<0.001), anterior scalene (group A, t=5.484, P<0.001; group B, t=8.063, P<0.001), and splenius capitis (group A, t=8.591, P<0.001; group B, t=8.258, P<0.001) muscle activity compared to baseline values. Isometric chin tuck alone and isometric chin tuck combined with scapular postural correction both showed significant reductions in neck pain and superficial neck muscle activity. Additional scapular postural correction training significantly increased the cervical angle and decreased the shoulder angle.","PeriodicalId":46562,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2021.0184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic neck pain is common in individuals with poor posture and motor control impairments. There has been increased interest in scapular postural correction in conjunction with the isometric chin tuck exercise. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of scapular postural correction while performing isometric chin tuck exercises for the improvement of neck pain, neck and shoulder alignment and superficial neck muscle activity in patients with chronic neck pain. A total of 32 participants with chronic, non-specific neck pain were randomly divided into two groups (groups A and B, both n=16), who performed isometric chin tuck exercises alone or isometric chin tuck with scapular postural correction respectively. The participants were instructed to perform five sets of the exercise with 10 repetitions for 6 weeks. Measurements were taken pre- and post-intervention to determine Neck Disability Index scores, postural parameters (head, cervical and shoulder angle) and superficial cervical muscle activity (sternocleidomastoid, anterior scalene, splenius capitis). Analysis of covariance was used to compare the post-intervention scores. Significant differences were observed between groups A and B in the cervical angle (F1,29=4.538, P=0.042) and shoulder angle (F1,29=8.357, P=0.007), when compared to baseline values. Both group A (t=12.097, P<0.001) and group B (t=8.032, P<0.001) showed a significant reduction in Neck Disability Index scores compared to baseline scores. Both group A and group B showed a significant decrease in sternocleidomastoid (group A: t=6.637, P<0.001; group B: t=10.143, P<0.001), anterior scalene (group A, t=5.484, P<0.001; group B, t=8.063, P<0.001), and splenius capitis (group A, t=8.591, P<0.001; group B, t=8.258, P<0.001) muscle activity compared to baseline values. Isometric chin tuck alone and isometric chin tuck combined with scapular postural correction both showed significant reductions in neck pain and superficial neck muscle activity. Additional scapular postural correction training significantly increased the cervical angle and decreased the shoulder angle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性颈部疼痛患者的等长收下巴运动伴或不伴肩胛骨姿势矫正:一项纵向研究
慢性颈部疼痛常见于姿势不良和运动控制障碍的个体。肩胛骨体位矫正与等距收下巴运动的结合已引起越来越多的兴趣。本研究的目的是探讨肩胛骨体位矫正同时进行等长收下巴运动对慢性颈部疼痛患者颈部疼痛、颈肩直线和颈部浅肌活动改善的临床疗效。32名慢性非特异性颈部疼痛患者被随机分为两组(A组和B组,均为16人),分别进行等距拉下巴运动或等距拉下巴并矫正肩胛骨姿势。参与者被要求做五组练习,重复10次,持续6周。在干预前和干预后进行测量,以确定颈部残疾指数评分、体位参数(头、颈、肩角)和颈浅肌活动(胸锁乳突肌、前斜角肌、头脾肌)。采用协方差分析比较干预后评分。A组和B组颈椎角(F1,29=4.538, P=0.042)和肩关节角(F1,29=8.357, P=0.007)与基线值比较差异有统计学意义。与基线评分相比,A组(t=12.097, P<0.001)和B组(t=8.032, P<0.001)的颈部残疾指数评分均显著降低。A组和B组胸锁乳突肌均显著降低(A组:t=6.637, P<0.001;B组:t=10.143, P<0.001)、前斜角肌(A组,t=5.484, P<0.001);B组,t=8.063, P<0.001), A组,t=8.591, P<0.001;B组,t=8.258, P<0.001)肌肉活动与基线值比较。单独的等距下巴收腹和等距下巴收腹联合肩胛骨姿势矫正都显示出颈部疼痛和颈部浅表肌肉活动的显著减少。额外的肩胛骨体位矫正训练显著增加了颈椎角,降低了肩关节角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation (IJTR) publishes original research, providing a platform for the latest key research findings in therapy and rehabilitation. Review and analysis articles are invited internationally to enable the sharing of practices and developments worldwide, and to raise awareness of different cultural influences in health care. IJTR provides an interdisciplinary approach to therapy and rehabilitation by: -Providing a well-referenced source of information to all professionals involved in therapy and rehabilitation worldwide, including occupational therapists, physiotherapists, chiropodists and podiatrists, radiographers, speech and language therapists and orthoptists -Providing a peer-reviewed source of original research and information presented in an accessible, informative and professional medium -Providing a forum for the discussion of new ideas, information and issues relating to therapy and rehabilitation -Creating an awareness of the national and international issues affecting professionals involved in therapy and rehabilitation -Encouraging collaboration and sharing of new ideas between professions worldwide
期刊最新文献
The relationships between upper extremity muscle strength and endurance with respiratory function, functional capacity and quality of life in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis Predicting outcomes, describing complications and optimising rehabilitation in patients undergoing lung transplantation Integrating the wrist-worn tracker in cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a scoping review Amplitude training in occupational therapy for the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a feasibility study Comparing the reliability of the Goniometer Pro application and flexicurve for measuring thoracic kyphosis: a cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1