Palm oil, the RED II and WTO law: EU sustainable biofuel policy tangled up in green?

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law Pub Date : 2020-12-07 DOI:10.1111/REEL.12386
S. Mayr, B. Hollaus, V. Madner
{"title":"Palm oil, the RED II and WTO law: EU sustainable biofuel policy tangled up in green?","authors":"S. Mayr, B. Hollaus, V. Madner","doi":"10.1111/REEL.12386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New European Union (EU) rules on biofuels have led to mounting tensions between the EU and some of its trading partners. A particularly contentious measure is the ‘freeze and phase‐out’ of certain biofuels in the transport sector with a high indirect land‐use change risk, as introduced by the recast of the Renewable Energy Directive. In light of Indonesia’s recent move to initiate proceedings against the EU at the World Trade Organization (WTO), this article systematically explores relevant key concepts of WTO law and analyses the compatibility of the EU measures with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement). While the EU measures are carefully crafted to avoid potential WTO pitfalls—such as applicability of the TBT Agreement—the article identifies several critical aspects that raise doubts about the measure’s compatibility with WTO law. In particular, the seemingly deliberate targeting of palm oil casts doubt on the justification of the measure on environmental grounds.","PeriodicalId":51681,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/REEL.12386","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

New European Union (EU) rules on biofuels have led to mounting tensions between the EU and some of its trading partners. A particularly contentious measure is the ‘freeze and phase‐out’ of certain biofuels in the transport sector with a high indirect land‐use change risk, as introduced by the recast of the Renewable Energy Directive. In light of Indonesia’s recent move to initiate proceedings against the EU at the World Trade Organization (WTO), this article systematically explores relevant key concepts of WTO law and analyses the compatibility of the EU measures with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement). While the EU measures are carefully crafted to avoid potential WTO pitfalls—such as applicability of the TBT Agreement—the article identifies several critical aspects that raise doubts about the measure’s compatibility with WTO law. In particular, the seemingly deliberate targeting of palm oil casts doubt on the justification of the measure on environmental grounds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
棕榈油、RED II和WTO法律:欧盟可持续生物燃料政策与绿色纠缠?
欧盟关于生物燃料的新规定导致欧盟与其一些贸易伙伴之间的紧张关系日益加剧。一项特别有争议的措施是“冻结并逐步淘汰”运输部门的某些生物燃料,这些生物燃料具有很高的间接土地利用变化风险,正如可再生能源指令的修订所引入的那样。鉴于印度尼西亚最近在世界贸易组织(WTO)对欧盟提起诉讼,本文系统地探讨了WTO法律的相关关键概念,并分析了欧盟措施与关税与贸易总协定(GATT)和技术性贸易壁垒协定(TBT协定)的兼容性。虽然欧盟的措施是精心设计的,以避免潜在的WTO陷阱——比如TBT协定的适用性——但文章指出了几个关键方面,这些方面使人们对该措施与WTO法律的兼容性产生了怀疑。特别是棕榈油似乎是故意针对的,这让人怀疑该措施在环境方面的合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
National discretion or broadening acceptable interpretation? A comparative overview of the transposition and implementation of the Water Framework Directive The Czech Republic v Poland (Mine de Turów): Politics and implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive The awkward relations between EU innovation policies and environmental law Towards the adoption of climate change acts in the Visegrad Group countries A quasi‐normative conflict: Resolving the tension between investment treaties and climate action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1