{"title":"Tribute to Gwilym P. Lewis","authors":"A. Bruneau, C. Hughes","doi":"10.1071/SBV32N6_TB","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The young Gwilym Lewis first joined the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, as part of the horticultural staff in 1974. There, his enthusiasm for botany was quickly noticed and he was soon recruited and, subsequently, promoted as part of the team of scientists in the herbarium, later going on to become a senior scientist in integrated monography at Kew. This drive, energy and dedication to botany, which were noted at the age of 22, have never left him. Gwilym has been a key contributor to research at Kew Gardens for nearly 45 years. These four decades have seen monumental changes in legume taxonomy, systematics and evolution, and Gwilym has been an important instigator and contributor to this movement both scientifically and as head of the legume section atKew, and indeed inmanyways, as leader of the legume systematics international research community as a whole in recent years. In the four decades sinceGwilymstarted his career, our vision of legume relationships has profoundly changed. In the early 1980s, the main legume lineages were thought to have evolved from broad common ancestors, exemplified by simple-flowered extratropical woody Caesalpinioideae (Polhill et al. 1981), and were usually portrayed as explicit ancestor-descendant relationships among informal groups of genera. Later in the 1980s, cladistics began to be adopted by legume researchers, the first phylogenetic analyses were presented in Advances in Legume Systematics (ALS) Part 3 (e.g. Crisp and Weston 1987; Lavin 1987; Zandee and Geesink 1987), and Jeff Doyle (1987) described the new molecular-biology tools and data and their tremendous potential for resolving evolutionary relationships. These approaches were fully embraced by the legume systematics community, and, in 1995 (ALS 7), 16 new phylogeneticstudiesacross thefamily,mostusingmoleculardata, were published. In the 1990s, the plastid rbcL gene was being sequenced to look at higher-level legume relationships (Doyle et al. 1997), in 2001, the first full legume plastomes were sequenced, and, in 2008, the full nuclear genome of Lotus japonicus appeared. By the mid-2000s, the phylogenetic framework and time frame of higher-level legume relationships were broadly established (Wojciechowski et al. 2004; Lavin et al. 2005; Bruneau et al. 2008), and, in 2019, we have now amassed DNA-sequence data for more than 5500 legume species, including nuclear genomes (~25 species) and several hundred plastid genomes (e.g. Egan and Vatanparast 2019), as well as produced a much more comprehensively sampled phylogeny of the family as a whole (Legume Phylogeny Working Group 2017). We are now seeing unprecedented use of these phylogenies to test hypotheses on Gwilym Peter Lewis","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1071/SBV32N6_TB","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/SBV32N6_TB","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The young Gwilym Lewis first joined the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, as part of the horticultural staff in 1974. There, his enthusiasm for botany was quickly noticed and he was soon recruited and, subsequently, promoted as part of the team of scientists in the herbarium, later going on to become a senior scientist in integrated monography at Kew. This drive, energy and dedication to botany, which were noted at the age of 22, have never left him. Gwilym has been a key contributor to research at Kew Gardens for nearly 45 years. These four decades have seen monumental changes in legume taxonomy, systematics and evolution, and Gwilym has been an important instigator and contributor to this movement both scientifically and as head of the legume section atKew, and indeed inmanyways, as leader of the legume systematics international research community as a whole in recent years. In the four decades sinceGwilymstarted his career, our vision of legume relationships has profoundly changed. In the early 1980s, the main legume lineages were thought to have evolved from broad common ancestors, exemplified by simple-flowered extratropical woody Caesalpinioideae (Polhill et al. 1981), and were usually portrayed as explicit ancestor-descendant relationships among informal groups of genera. Later in the 1980s, cladistics began to be adopted by legume researchers, the first phylogenetic analyses were presented in Advances in Legume Systematics (ALS) Part 3 (e.g. Crisp and Weston 1987; Lavin 1987; Zandee and Geesink 1987), and Jeff Doyle (1987) described the new molecular-biology tools and data and their tremendous potential for resolving evolutionary relationships. These approaches were fully embraced by the legume systematics community, and, in 1995 (ALS 7), 16 new phylogeneticstudiesacross thefamily,mostusingmoleculardata, were published. In the 1990s, the plastid rbcL gene was being sequenced to look at higher-level legume relationships (Doyle et al. 1997), in 2001, the first full legume plastomes were sequenced, and, in 2008, the full nuclear genome of Lotus japonicus appeared. By the mid-2000s, the phylogenetic framework and time frame of higher-level legume relationships were broadly established (Wojciechowski et al. 2004; Lavin et al. 2005; Bruneau et al. 2008), and, in 2019, we have now amassed DNA-sequence data for more than 5500 legume species, including nuclear genomes (~25 species) and several hundred plastid genomes (e.g. Egan and Vatanparast 2019), as well as produced a much more comprehensively sampled phylogeny of the family as a whole (Legume Phylogeny Working Group 2017). We are now seeing unprecedented use of these phylogenies to test hypotheses on Gwilym Peter Lewis
1974年,年轻的格温·刘易斯第一次加入皇家植物园,成为邱园园艺师的一员。在那里,他对植物学的热情很快被注意到,他很快被招募,随后被提升为植物标本室科学家团队的一员,后来又成为邱园综合专著的高级科学家。22岁时,他对植物学的干劲、精力和奉献精神从未离开过他。近45年来,Gwilym一直是邱园研究的关键贡献者。这四十年见证了豆科植物分类学、系统学和进化方面的巨大变化,Gwilym在科学上和作为基尤大学豆科部门的负责人,以及在许多方面,作为近年来整个豆科植物系统学国际研究界的领导者,一直是这一运动的重要推动者和贡献者。在格林开始他的职业生涯的40年里,我们对豆类关系的看法发生了深刻的变化。在20世纪80年代早期,豆科植物的主要谱系被认为是从广泛的共同祖先进化而来的,例如有简单花的温带木本植物Caesalpinioideae (Polhill et al. 1981),并且通常被描述为非正式属群之间明确的祖先-后代关系。后来在20世纪80年代,豆科研究人员开始采用分支学,首次系统发育分析在豆科系统学进展(ALS)第3部分中提出(如Crisp和Weston 1987;拉文1987;Zandee and Geesink(1987)和Jeff Doyle(1987)描述了新的分子生物学工具和数据,以及它们在解决进化关系方面的巨大潜力。这些方法被豆科系统学社区完全接受,并且在1995年(ALS 7),发表了16项新的跨家族系统发育研究,其中大部分使用分子数据。20世纪90年代,人们开始对质体rbcL基因进行测序,以研究更高水平的豆科植物关系(Doyle et al. 1997), 2001年,首次对豆科植物质体进行了全基因组测序,2008年,日本莲花(Lotus japonicus)的全核基因组出现。到2000年代中期,豆科植物高级关系的系统发育框架和时间框架被广泛建立(Wojciechowski et al. 2004;Lavin et al. 2005;2019年,我们已经收集了5500多个豆科物种的dna序列数据,包括核基因组(约25个物种)和数百个质体基因组(如Egan和Vatanparast 2019),并对整个家族的系统发育进行了更全面的采样(豆科系统发育工作组2017年)。我们现在看到前所未有地使用这些系统发育学来检验关于格林姆·彼得·刘易斯的假设
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.