Forward head posture and neck disability: what is the effect on lung function?

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Exploration of medicine Pub Date : 2023-04-26 DOI:10.37349/emed.2023.00134
G. Annarumma, Alessandro Spinelli, Alessandro Serio, Tammaro Di Fraia, Carlo Maria Gallinoro, Lucrezia Caoduro, D. Tarantino, A. Demeco, Erica Keeling, S. Palermi, A. Biffi, F. Sirico
{"title":"Forward head posture and neck disability: what is the effect on lung function?","authors":"G. Annarumma, Alessandro Spinelli, Alessandro Serio, Tammaro Di Fraia, Carlo Maria Gallinoro, Lucrezia Caoduro, D. Tarantino, A. Demeco, Erica Keeling, S. Palermi, A. Biffi, F. Sirico","doi":"10.37349/emed.2023.00134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Forward head posture (FHP) is a very common pathological neck posture among people who frequently use multimedia devices, and it could be related to some musculoskeletal disorders. However, its role in influencing lung function and its relationship with neck disability are still debated in the literature. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of FHP on respiratory function, and to explore a possible relationship between FHP and neck discomfort.\nMethods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 83 subjects (35.7 ± 8.4 years aged), enrolled at the Ferrari corporate wellness program “Formula Benessere”. Craniovertebral angle (CVA) was measured with a digital goniometer to assess head posture: FHP was defined with a CVA < 50° in an upright position. Spirometry was conducted according to European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS) criteria. Finally, subjects enrolled were evaluated through a self-administered neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire.\nResults: Among the 60 participants with agreement about the CVA measurements, 45 had FHP (11 females and 34 males) with lower CVA values. No significant differences were found in spirometric parameters between subjects with FHP (n = 45) and subjects without FHP (n = 15). Furthermore, the two groups did not differ either in NDI scores (P = 0.148).\nConclusions: There is no clear relationship between FHP and respiratory function indices. Moreover, no differences have been found in NDI values between subjects with FHP and subjects without FHP. Respiratory rehabilitation strategies should be focused on other parameters than FHP itself.","PeriodicalId":72999,"journal":{"name":"Exploration of medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploration of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37349/emed.2023.00134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Forward head posture (FHP) is a very common pathological neck posture among people who frequently use multimedia devices, and it could be related to some musculoskeletal disorders. However, its role in influencing lung function and its relationship with neck disability are still debated in the literature. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of FHP on respiratory function, and to explore a possible relationship between FHP and neck discomfort. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 83 subjects (35.7 ± 8.4 years aged), enrolled at the Ferrari corporate wellness program “Formula Benessere”. Craniovertebral angle (CVA) was measured with a digital goniometer to assess head posture: FHP was defined with a CVA < 50° in an upright position. Spirometry was conducted according to European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS) criteria. Finally, subjects enrolled were evaluated through a self-administered neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire. Results: Among the 60 participants with agreement about the CVA measurements, 45 had FHP (11 females and 34 males) with lower CVA values. No significant differences were found in spirometric parameters between subjects with FHP (n = 45) and subjects without FHP (n = 15). Furthermore, the two groups did not differ either in NDI scores (P = 0.148). Conclusions: There is no clear relationship between FHP and respiratory function indices. Moreover, no differences have been found in NDI values between subjects with FHP and subjects without FHP. Respiratory rehabilitation strategies should be focused on other parameters than FHP itself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头部前倾与颈部残疾:对肺功能有什么影响?
目的:前倾头位(FHP)是经常使用多媒体设备的人群中非常常见的病理性颈部姿势,可能与某些肌肉骨骼疾病有关。然而,其在影响肺功能中的作用及其与颈部残疾的关系在文献中仍存在争议。因此,本研究旨在探讨FHP对呼吸功能的影响,并探讨FHP与颈部不适之间的可能关系。方法:采用横断面研究方法,对参加法拉利公司健康项目“Formula Benessere”的83名受试者(35.7±8.4岁)进行研究。用数字测角仪测量颅椎角(CVA)来评估头部姿势:直立位置时CVA < 50°定义为FHP。肺量测定按照欧洲呼吸学会/美国胸科学会(ERS/ATS)标准进行。最后,受试者通过自我管理的颈部残疾指数(NDI)问卷进行评估。结果:在60名对CVA测量结果一致的参与者中,45名FHP(11名女性,34名男性)的CVA值较低。FHP患者(n = 45)和非FHP患者(n = 15)的肺活量测定参数无显著差异。此外,两组在NDI评分上也没有差异(P = 0.148)。结论:FHP与呼吸功能指标无明显关系。此外,有FHP的受试者和没有FHP的受试者在NDI值上没有差异。呼吸康复策略应侧重于FHP本身以外的其他参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
The future of cervical cancer prevention: advances in research and technology Impact of vitamin D on ultraviolet-induced photoaging and skin diseases Physiologically driven nanodrug delivery system for targeted lung cancer treatment Effects of alimentary-derived bacterial metabolites on energy metabolism in colonic epithelial cells and inflammatory bowel diseases Medicinal and immunological aspects of bacteriophage therapy to combat antibiotic resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1