Urgent PC Versus a Generic Posterior Tibial Neurostimulator for Overactive Bladder: A Retrospective Noninferiority Study

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001168
S. Handler, Su Yang, J. Nguyen
{"title":"Urgent PC Versus a Generic Posterior Tibial Neurostimulator for Overactive Bladder: A Retrospective Noninferiority Study","authors":"S. Handler, Su Yang, J. Nguyen","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this cohort of women undergoing posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for nonneurogenic overactive bladder (OAB), urgency urinary incontinence, or mixed urinary incontinence, a generic neurostimulator device demonstrated noninferior outcomes compared with urgent PC. Objective The aim of the study was to determine whether a generic posterior tibial neurostimulator was noninferior to Urgent PC in the treatment of nonneurogenic OAB, urgency urinary incontinence, and mixed urinary incontinence. Secondary outcomes include rates of starting and completing 3 months of maintenance therapy, treatment success after 3 months, and adverse events. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of women whose nonneurogenic OAB, urgency urinary incontinence, or mixed urinary incontinence was treated with either Urgent PC or a generic posterior tibial neurostimulator. Previous research shows a 55% treatment success rate for posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS). To demonstrate noninferiority with a limit of 14% and 80% power, our analysis required 157 patients per group. Results We included 267 Urgent PC and 234 generic patients and excluded 51 patients from analysis. A per-protocol analysis demonstrated treatment success in 55.3% (121 of 219) of the Urgent PC and 48.6% (85 of 175) of the generic cohort (P = 0.187). An intention-to-treat analysis showed treatment success in 45.3% (121 of 267) of the Urgent PC and 36.3% (85 of 234) of the generic cohort (P = 0.690). There were no significant differences in rates of starting (82.2% vs 78.2%, P = 0.409) or completing (79.9% vs 70.9%, P = 0.129) 3 months of maintenance therapy, treatment success after 3 months (78.5% vs 73.8%, P = 0.485), and adverse events (0.37% vs 0.85%, P = 1.000) in the Urgent PC versus generic group, respectively. Conclusions In this cohort of women undergoing PTNS for nonneurogenic OAB, urgency urinary incontinence, or mixed urinary incontinence, the generic neurostimulator demonstrated noninferior rates of treatment success compared with Urgent PC.","PeriodicalId":48831,"journal":{"name":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"28 1","pages":"136 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this cohort of women undergoing posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for nonneurogenic overactive bladder (OAB), urgency urinary incontinence, or mixed urinary incontinence, a generic neurostimulator device demonstrated noninferior outcomes compared with urgent PC. Objective The aim of the study was to determine whether a generic posterior tibial neurostimulator was noninferior to Urgent PC in the treatment of nonneurogenic OAB, urgency urinary incontinence, and mixed urinary incontinence. Secondary outcomes include rates of starting and completing 3 months of maintenance therapy, treatment success after 3 months, and adverse events. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of women whose nonneurogenic OAB, urgency urinary incontinence, or mixed urinary incontinence was treated with either Urgent PC or a generic posterior tibial neurostimulator. Previous research shows a 55% treatment success rate for posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS). To demonstrate noninferiority with a limit of 14% and 80% power, our analysis required 157 patients per group. Results We included 267 Urgent PC and 234 generic patients and excluded 51 patients from analysis. A per-protocol analysis demonstrated treatment success in 55.3% (121 of 219) of the Urgent PC and 48.6% (85 of 175) of the generic cohort (P = 0.187). An intention-to-treat analysis showed treatment success in 45.3% (121 of 267) of the Urgent PC and 36.3% (85 of 234) of the generic cohort (P = 0.690). There were no significant differences in rates of starting (82.2% vs 78.2%, P = 0.409) or completing (79.9% vs 70.9%, P = 0.129) 3 months of maintenance therapy, treatment success after 3 months (78.5% vs 73.8%, P = 0.485), and adverse events (0.37% vs 0.85%, P = 1.000) in the Urgent PC versus generic group, respectively. Conclusions In this cohort of women undergoing PTNS for nonneurogenic OAB, urgency urinary incontinence, or mixed urinary incontinence, the generic neurostimulator demonstrated noninferior rates of treatment success compared with Urgent PC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紧急PC与通用胫骨后神经刺激器治疗膀胱过度活动的回顾性非劣效性研究
在这组接受胫骨后神经刺激(PTNS)治疗非神经源性膀胱过度活动症(OAB)、紧迫性尿失禁或混合性尿失禁的女性中,与紧迫性PC相比,通用神经刺激装置显示出非劣效结果。目的本研究的目的是确定通用胫骨后神经刺激器在治疗非神经源性OAB、紧迫性尿失禁和混合性尿失禁方面是否不劣于紧急PC。次要结果包括开始和完成3个月维持治疗的比率、3个月后的治疗成功率和不良事件。方法我们对使用紧急PC或通用胫骨后神经刺激器治疗非神经源性OAB、紧急性尿失禁或混合性尿失禁的女性进行了回顾性队列分析。先前的研究表明,胫骨后神经刺激(PTNS)的治疗成功率为55%。为了证明具有14%和80%功效的非劣效性,我们的分析要求每组157名患者。结果我们纳入了267例急诊PC和234例普通型患者,并排除了51例患者。根据方案分析显示,55.3%(121/219)的紧急PC和48.6%(85/175)的普通队列的治疗成功(P=0.187)。意向治疗分析显示,45.3%(121/267)的紧急电脑和36.3%(85/234)的普通人群的治疗成功率(P=0.690)紧急PC组与普通PC组分别完成(79.9%vs 70.9%,P=0.129)3个月的维持治疗、3个月后的治疗成功率(78.5%vs 73.8%,P=0.485)和不良事件(0.37%vs 0.85%,P=1.000)。结论在接受PTNS治疗非神经源性OAB、紧急性尿失禁或混合性尿失禁的女性队列中,与紧急型PC相比,通用神经刺激器的治疗成功率并不低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, official journal of the American Urogynecologic Society, is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to specialists, physicians and allied health professionals concerned with prevention, diagnosis and treatment of female pelvic floor disorders. The journal publishes original clinical research, basic science research, education, scientific advances, case reports, scientific reviews, editorials and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
AUGS-PERFORM: A New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Quality of Prolapse Care. Factors Associated With a Positive Urine Culture in Women Seeking Urogynecologic Care for Urinary Tract Infection Symptoms. Complications Reported to the Food and Drug Administration: A Cross-sectional Comparison of Urogynecologic Meshes. The Role of Pessaries in the Treatment of Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Impact of Methenamine Hippurate Treatment on Urothelial Integrity and Bladder Inflammation in Aged Female Mice and Women With Urinary Tract Infections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1