Brain Protection in Patients with Aortic Dissection and Coronary Artery Disease

I. Zhekov, V. Kravchenko, Oleh I. Sarhosh, Genadii A. Zinchenko, A. Rudenko
{"title":"Brain Protection in Patients with Aortic Dissection and Coronary Artery Disease","authors":"I. Zhekov, V. Kravchenko, Oleh I. Sarhosh, Genadii A. Zinchenko, A. Rudenko","doi":"10.30702/ujcvs/22.30(03)/zhk038-9397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim. To compare the effectiveness of methods of protecting the brain and visceral organs during operations for aortic aneurysms combined with coronary artery lesions. \nMaterials and methods. In the period from 2012 to 2020, 23 patients with Stanford type A and non-A non-B aortic dissection with damage to the coronary arteries were operated at the National Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the NAMS of Ukraine using the brain protection techniques. Out of 23 surgical interventions, 16 were performed for Stanford type A acute aortic dissection, 3 for Stanford type A chronic aortic dissection, 1 for Stanford type A subacute aortic dissection, and 3 for Stanford non-A non-B aortic dissection. The main causes of aortic dissection were hypertension (16 patients), Marfan syndrome (3 patients), bicuspid aortic valve (4 patients). \nResults. The most threatening postoperative complication in this group of patients is neurological damage, which was observed in 4 (17%) patients after surgery, with gradual recovery of brain function. Also, the complications observed were respiratory failure in 3 (13%) patients, which required long-term artificial ventilation (more than 72 hours), and multiple organ failure in 1 (4.3%) patient, which caused a fatal outcome.Complications such as kidney and liver failure were not observed (most likely due to the small sample size). Heart failure was not noted as well. Hospital mortality was 4.3% (1 fatal case). In our study, among the entire group of operated patients, symptoms of neurological damage occurred in 4 (17.4%) patients, hemorrhagic stroke was present in 1 (4.3%) patient with a complicated medical history, 2 (8.6%) patients had hemiparesis and in 1 case (4.3%) there were cognitive disorders. \nConclusions. Comparing brain protection techniques, taking into account the prolongation of aortic clamping time due to coronary artery shunting compared to isolated aortic dissection, it can be concluded that longer duration of selective brain perfusion (retrograde or antegrade) or duration of circulatory arrest more often lead to postoperative complications, namely neurological lesions. \nOn the other hand, the small number of observations does not make it possible to fully assess the impact of each of the techniques. Further follow-up with a larger sample will provide opportunities for a more complete evaluation of brain protection techniques in operations for dissecting aortic aneurysms and coronary artery lesions.","PeriodicalId":33680,"journal":{"name":"Ukrayins''kii zhurnal sertsevosudinnoyi khirurgiyi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrayins''kii zhurnal sertsevosudinnoyi khirurgiyi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30702/ujcvs/22.30(03)/zhk038-9397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim. To compare the effectiveness of methods of protecting the brain and visceral organs during operations for aortic aneurysms combined with coronary artery lesions. Materials and methods. In the period from 2012 to 2020, 23 patients with Stanford type A and non-A non-B aortic dissection with damage to the coronary arteries were operated at the National Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the NAMS of Ukraine using the brain protection techniques. Out of 23 surgical interventions, 16 were performed for Stanford type A acute aortic dissection, 3 for Stanford type A chronic aortic dissection, 1 for Stanford type A subacute aortic dissection, and 3 for Stanford non-A non-B aortic dissection. The main causes of aortic dissection were hypertension (16 patients), Marfan syndrome (3 patients), bicuspid aortic valve (4 patients). Results. The most threatening postoperative complication in this group of patients is neurological damage, which was observed in 4 (17%) patients after surgery, with gradual recovery of brain function. Also, the complications observed were respiratory failure in 3 (13%) patients, which required long-term artificial ventilation (more than 72 hours), and multiple organ failure in 1 (4.3%) patient, which caused a fatal outcome.Complications such as kidney and liver failure were not observed (most likely due to the small sample size). Heart failure was not noted as well. Hospital mortality was 4.3% (1 fatal case). In our study, among the entire group of operated patients, symptoms of neurological damage occurred in 4 (17.4%) patients, hemorrhagic stroke was present in 1 (4.3%) patient with a complicated medical history, 2 (8.6%) patients had hemiparesis and in 1 case (4.3%) there were cognitive disorders. Conclusions. Comparing brain protection techniques, taking into account the prolongation of aortic clamping time due to coronary artery shunting compared to isolated aortic dissection, it can be concluded that longer duration of selective brain perfusion (retrograde or antegrade) or duration of circulatory arrest more often lead to postoperative complications, namely neurological lesions. On the other hand, the small number of observations does not make it possible to fully assess the impact of each of the techniques. Further follow-up with a larger sample will provide opportunities for a more complete evaluation of brain protection techniques in operations for dissecting aortic aneurysms and coronary artery lesions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动脉夹层和冠状动脉疾病患者的脑保护
的目标。目的比较主动脉瘤合并冠状动脉病变手术中脑脏器保护方法的有效性。材料和方法。2012年至2020年,在乌克兰NAMS国家阿莫索夫心血管外科研究所采用脑保护技术对23例冠状动脉损伤的Stanford A型和非A型非b型主动脉夹层患者进行了手术。在23例手术干预中,有16例是针对斯坦福A型急性主动脉夹层,3例是针对斯坦福A型慢性主动脉夹层,1例是针对斯坦福A型亚急性主动脉夹层,3例是针对斯坦福非A非b型主动脉夹层。导致主动脉夹层的主要原因为高血压(16例)、马凡氏综合征(3例)、二尖瓣主动脉瓣(4例)。结果。本组患者术后最严重的并发症是神经损伤,术后4例(17%)患者出现神经损伤,脑功能逐渐恢复。此外,观察到的并发症有3例(13%)患者呼吸衰竭,需要长期人工通气(超过72小时),1例(4.3%)患者多器官衰竭,导致死亡。未观察到肾脏和肝脏衰竭等并发症(很可能是由于样本量小)。心脏衰竭也没有被注意到。住院死亡率为4.3%(1例死亡)。本组手术患者中,4例(17.4%)患者出现神经损伤症状,1例(4.3%)患者有复杂病史,2例(8.6%)患者有偏瘫,1例(4.3%)患者有认知障碍。结论。对比脑保护技术,考虑到冠状动脉分流导致的主动脉夹持时间比孤立的主动脉夹层延长,可以得出结论,更长的选择性脑灌注时间(逆行或顺行)或循环停搏时间更容易导致术后并发症,即神经系统病变。另一方面,由于观测的数量很少,因此不可能充分评估每种技术的影响。对更大样本的进一步随访将为更全面地评估夹层动脉瘤和冠状动脉病变手术中的脑保护技术提供机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the Use of Non-Invasive Lung Ventilation Support in Newborns and Young Children after Cardiac Surgery Features of the Course of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with the History of COVID-19: Impact on the Possibility and Tactics of Restoring Sinus Rhythm Features of Catheter Treatment of Non-Isthmus-Dependent Atrial Flutter Issues of Organization of the Cardiac Surgical Care in Ukraine under Martial Law Hemostasiological Aspects of PCI: Periprocedural Changes in the Activity of the Platelet Link of Hemocoagulation on the Background of Prior Double Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1