A camera trap record of scavengers at a kudu carcass: implications for archaeological bone accumulations

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Transactions of The Royal Society of South Africa Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1080/0035919X.2020.1813215
L. Wadley
{"title":"A camera trap record of scavengers at a kudu carcass: implications for archaeological bone accumulations","authors":"L. Wadley","doi":"10.1080/0035919X.2020.1813215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A camera trap was set near a greater kudu bull carcass for 3 weeks at the start of winter. The carcass lay in an open savanna setting on a game farm in Limpopo, and it was visited by leopard, brown hyena, black-backed jackal, African civet, honey badger, bushpig and warthog. At the end of a month there were no visible remains of the carcass save the skull and damaged horns. After a week, when decomposition was pronounced, suids spent more time at the carcass than other animals. They may have been responsible for much of the on-site bone consumption. Bone and meat portions not eaten directly at the death scene were probably carried away by scavengers like brown hyena and jackal. The area was excavated and sieved to collect bone debris that might have been trampled into sediment. Only a few small bone fragments were recovered, one of which had a tooth mark. Several outcomes are of interest to archaeologists. Firstly, the diversity of scavengers at the kudu carcass (including some animals not normally classified as scavengers) suggests that damage on surviving bone at some archaeological sites may be from an assortment of animals not normally considered to be scavengers. Comparative collections must accommodate such variety. Secondly, under certain environmental conditions, death assemblages in the wild may disappear without trace when predators can move freely and feed without disturbance. Thirdly, is possible that some bone fragments survive at archaeological sites because they were protected (possibly unintentionally) by human presence, and because they were on occasion processed in ways that made them less attractive to predators.","PeriodicalId":23255,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of The Royal Society of South Africa","volume":"75 1","pages":"245 - 257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0035919X.2020.1813215","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of The Royal Society of South Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0035919X.2020.1813215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A camera trap was set near a greater kudu bull carcass for 3 weeks at the start of winter. The carcass lay in an open savanna setting on a game farm in Limpopo, and it was visited by leopard, brown hyena, black-backed jackal, African civet, honey badger, bushpig and warthog. At the end of a month there were no visible remains of the carcass save the skull and damaged horns. After a week, when decomposition was pronounced, suids spent more time at the carcass than other animals. They may have been responsible for much of the on-site bone consumption. Bone and meat portions not eaten directly at the death scene were probably carried away by scavengers like brown hyena and jackal. The area was excavated and sieved to collect bone debris that might have been trampled into sediment. Only a few small bone fragments were recovered, one of which had a tooth mark. Several outcomes are of interest to archaeologists. Firstly, the diversity of scavengers at the kudu carcass (including some animals not normally classified as scavengers) suggests that damage on surviving bone at some archaeological sites may be from an assortment of animals not normally considered to be scavengers. Comparative collections must accommodate such variety. Secondly, under certain environmental conditions, death assemblages in the wild may disappear without trace when predators can move freely and feed without disturbance. Thirdly, is possible that some bone fragments survive at archaeological sites because they were protected (possibly unintentionally) by human presence, and because they were on occasion processed in ways that made them less attractive to predators.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
库杜尸体上拾荒者的相机捕捉记录:对考古骨骼堆积的启示
立冬时,在一头更大的库杜公牛尸体附近设置了一个摄像头陷阱,为期3周。这具尸体躺在林波波一个狩猎场的开阔草原上,豹子、棕色鬣狗、黑背豺、非洲灵猫、蜜獾、丛林猪和野猪都曾造访过它。一个月底,除了头骨和受损的角外,没有任何可见的尸体残骸。一周后,当尸体腐烂时,猪在尸体上的时间比其他动物多。他们可能对现场的大部分骨骼消耗负有责任。在死亡现场没有直接食用的骨头和肉部分可能被棕色鬣狗和豺狼等拾荒者带走了。该地区被挖掘并过筛,以收集可能被践踏成沉积物的骨头碎片。只发现了几块小骨头碎片,其中一块有牙齿痕迹。考古学家对几个结果感兴趣。首先,库杜尸体上清道夫的多样性(包括一些通常不被归类为清道夫的动物)表明,一些考古遗址幸存骨骼的损伤可能来自通常不被认为是清道夫的各种动物。比较收藏必须适应这种多样性。其次,在一定的环境条件下,当捕食者能够自由活动并在没有干扰的情况下觅食时,野外的死亡群落可能会消失得无影无踪。第三,一些骨头碎片在考古遗址中幸存下来,可能是因为它们受到了人类存在的保护(可能是无意的),也可能是因为有时它们被处理的方式降低了对捕食者的吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transactions of The Royal Society of South Africa
Transactions of The Royal Society of South Africa Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa , published on behalf of the Royal Society of South Africa since 1908, comprises a rich archive of original scientific research in and beyond South Africa. Since 1878, when it was founded as Transactions of the South African Philosophical Society, the Journal’s strength has lain in its multi- and inter-disciplinary orientation, which is aimed at ‘promoting the improvement and diffusion of science in all its branches’ (original Charter). Today this includes natural, physical, medical, environmental and earth sciences as well as any other topic that may be of interest or importance to the people of Africa. Transactions publishes original research papers, review articles, special issues, feature articles, festschriften and book reviews. While coverage emphasizes southern Africa, submissions concerning the rest of the continent are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Professor Michael (MIKE) Richard Perrin 28 December 1946–28 December 2023 Biophysical system perspectives on future change in African mountains Wattles: Australian Acacia species around the world Wattles: Australian Acacia species around the world : edited by D.M. Richardson, J.J. le Roux and Elizabete Marchante, Wallingford, UK, CABI, 2023, 544 pp., 185 Pounds Stirling (hardback), ISBN 978-1-80062-217-3 A systematic review on remote sensing of wetland environments Assessing plant utilisation by communities bordering a protected area in Zimbabwe using utilitarian diversity metrics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1