Long-term Analysis of Epi-ON Corneal Collagen Cross-linking Outcomes in Corneal Ectasia

R. Melián, Vicente Rodriguez, H. Carreras, D. Piñero, J. González-Martín, Francisco Galván
{"title":"Long-term Analysis of Epi-ON Corneal Collagen Cross-linking Outcomes in Corneal Ectasia","authors":"R. Melián, Vicente Rodriguez, H. Carreras, D. Piñero, J. González-Martín, Francisco Galván","doi":"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10025-1187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim and objective: To evaluate the 3-year follow-up clinical outcomes obtained in corneal ectasia using Epi-ON corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL). Materials and methods: This study is a retrospective study enrolling 46 eyes from 32 patients with progressive corneal ectasia and treated with Epi-ON CXL in the period from September 2012 to April 2016. Two groups were differentiated according to the type of corneal ectasia: ectasia post-LASIK group (EPL, 12 eyes) and primary ectasia group (34 eyes). Two different platforms were used for the surgical protocol: VEGA CBM X LINKER platform (CSO, Firenze, Italy) and KXL (Avedro, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Visual, refractive, and corneal tomographic outcomes were evaluated during a 3-year follow-up. Results: A statistically significant improvement in the logMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was observed in the whole sample ( p < 0.001) during the follow-up, with half of the sample improving one or more lines of CDVA. Likewise, only significant changes were detected in steepest keratometry ( p < 0.001), corneal astigmatism ( p = 0.012), and index of height asymmetry ( p = 0.021), with a trend to increase. Regarding the comparison between groups, more significant improvement in CDVA was found in the EPL group compared to the primary ectasia group (−0.07 ± 0.09 vs −0.15 ± 0.14, p = 0.028). Likewise, a significant trend to more corneal thinning was observed in primary ectasia group ( p = 0.034). Conclusion: Epi-ON CXL is efficacious for stabilizing the progression of primary and iatrogenic ectasias for most cases, with significant improvement of visual acuity associated.","PeriodicalId":92051,"journal":{"name":"International journal of keratoconus and ectatic corneal diseases","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of keratoconus and ectatic corneal diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10025-1187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim and objective: To evaluate the 3-year follow-up clinical outcomes obtained in corneal ectasia using Epi-ON corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL). Materials and methods: This study is a retrospective study enrolling 46 eyes from 32 patients with progressive corneal ectasia and treated with Epi-ON CXL in the period from September 2012 to April 2016. Two groups were differentiated according to the type of corneal ectasia: ectasia post-LASIK group (EPL, 12 eyes) and primary ectasia group (34 eyes). Two different platforms were used for the surgical protocol: VEGA CBM X LINKER platform (CSO, Firenze, Italy) and KXL (Avedro, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Visual, refractive, and corneal tomographic outcomes were evaluated during a 3-year follow-up. Results: A statistically significant improvement in the logMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was observed in the whole sample ( p < 0.001) during the follow-up, with half of the sample improving one or more lines of CDVA. Likewise, only significant changes were detected in steepest keratometry ( p < 0.001), corneal astigmatism ( p = 0.012), and index of height asymmetry ( p = 0.021), with a trend to increase. Regarding the comparison between groups, more significant improvement in CDVA was found in the EPL group compared to the primary ectasia group (−0.07 ± 0.09 vs −0.15 ± 0.14, p = 0.028). Likewise, a significant trend to more corneal thinning was observed in primary ectasia group ( p = 0.034). Conclusion: Epi-ON CXL is efficacious for stabilizing the progression of primary and iatrogenic ectasias for most cases, with significant improvement of visual acuity associated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Epi-ON角膜胶原交联治疗角膜扩张的远期疗效分析
目的:评价Epi-ON角膜胶原交联(CXL)治疗角膜扩张的3年随访临床效果。材料与方法:本研究是一项回顾性研究,纳入2012年9月至2016年4月期间接受Epi-ON CXL治疗的32例进行性角膜扩张患者46只眼。根据角膜扩张类型分为lasik后扩张组(EPL, 12眼)和原发扩张组(34眼)。手术方案采用了两种不同的平台:VEGA CBM X LINKER平台(CSO,佛罗伦萨,意大利)和KXL (Avedro, Waltham,马萨诸塞州,美国)。在3年随访期间评估视力、屈光和角膜断层扫描结果。结果:在随访期间,整个样本的logMAR矫正距离视力(CDVA)有统计学意义的改善(p < 0.001),其中一半的样本改善了一条或多条CDVA。同样,只有最陡角膜度数(p < 0.001)、角膜散光(p = 0.012)和高度不对称指数(p = 0.021)有显著变化,且有增加趋势。两组比较,EPL组CDVA较原发性扩张组改善更显著(- 0.07±0.09 vs - 0.15±0.14,p = 0.028)。同样,原发性扩张组也有明显的角膜变薄趋势(p = 0.034)。结论:Epi-ON CXL能有效稳定原发性和医源性扩张的进展,并能显著改善患者的视力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Variable Thickness Intracorneal Ring Segment for the Treatment of Keratoconus Treatment of High Astigmatism after Penetrating Keratoplasty in Patients with Keratoconus with 800 µm Base Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments: A Retrospective Study Transepithelial (Epi-on) Corneal Collagen Cross-linking with Supplemental Oxygen as a Treatment for Patients with Progressive Keratoconus in Oman: 1-year Results Superior Keratoconus: A Case Report and Review of Literature Two-year Outcomes of Transepithelial Customized Cross-linking for Mild to Moderate Keratoconus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1