This Time Is Different, but It Will End the Same Way: Unrecognized Secular Changes in the Bond Market since the 2008 Crisis That May Precipitate the Next Crisis

Daniel Zwirn, J. Liew, A. Ajakh
{"title":"This Time Is Different, but It Will End the Same Way: Unrecognized Secular Changes in the Bond Market since the 2008 Crisis That May Precipitate the Next Crisis","authors":"Daniel Zwirn, J. Liew, A. Ajakh","doi":"10.3905/jfi.2019.29.2.066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The US bond market had over $42.39 trillion of outstanding debt at the end of the third quarter of 2018, eclipsing the US stock market’s approximately $30 trillion in market capitalization. The sheer size of the bond market provides ample opportunities, as well as risks, for institutional investors. Some of these risks escape investors’ radar because of the nature of fixed income securities: low transparency, illiquidity, and over-the-counter (OTC) trading. In this article, the authors present our concerns regarding five secular changes wrought by the over-regulation of the marketplace after the financial crisis of 2008 and investors’ persistent thirst for yield. Further, although painful lessons were gleaned after the punishing 2008 financial crisis, the authors present empirical evidence that suggests that many sectors, such as auto loans and collateralized loan obligations, that were largely unscathed by this crisis may be at risk in the next downturn. This article is based on original data sources and academic research. The authors are in continuing dialogue with other experts that may further the research, and welcome interested parties to get in contact. TOPICS: Financial crises and financial market history, statistical methods Key Findings • Lack of market-making and other regulatory changes that will impede price discovery in the next downturn. • Masking of the deterioration of underlying collateral and rearview mirror analysis. • New versions of the old games played by the rating agencies. • Explosion in number of Asset-Liability mismatched structures. • Regulatory changes in compliance of financial institutions.","PeriodicalId":53711,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fixed Income","volume":"29 1","pages":"66 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fixed Income","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jfi.2019.29.2.066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The US bond market had over $42.39 trillion of outstanding debt at the end of the third quarter of 2018, eclipsing the US stock market’s approximately $30 trillion in market capitalization. The sheer size of the bond market provides ample opportunities, as well as risks, for institutional investors. Some of these risks escape investors’ radar because of the nature of fixed income securities: low transparency, illiquidity, and over-the-counter (OTC) trading. In this article, the authors present our concerns regarding five secular changes wrought by the over-regulation of the marketplace after the financial crisis of 2008 and investors’ persistent thirst for yield. Further, although painful lessons were gleaned after the punishing 2008 financial crisis, the authors present empirical evidence that suggests that many sectors, such as auto loans and collateralized loan obligations, that were largely unscathed by this crisis may be at risk in the next downturn. This article is based on original data sources and academic research. The authors are in continuing dialogue with other experts that may further the research, and welcome interested parties to get in contact. TOPICS: Financial crises and financial market history, statistical methods Key Findings • Lack of market-making and other regulatory changes that will impede price discovery in the next downturn. • Masking of the deterioration of underlying collateral and rearview mirror analysis. • New versions of the old games played by the rating agencies. • Explosion in number of Asset-Liability mismatched structures. • Regulatory changes in compliance of financial institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这次不同,但将以同样的方式结束:自2008年危机以来债券市场未被认识到的长期变化可能引发下一次危机
截至2018年第三季度末,美国债券市场有超过42.39万亿美元的未偿债务,超过了美国股市约30万亿美元的市值。债券市场的巨大规模为机构投资者提供了充足的机会和风险。由于固定收益证券的性质,其中一些风险没有引起投资者的注意:低透明度、非流动性和场外交易。在这篇文章中,作者提出了我们对2008年金融危机后市场过度监管和投资者对收益率的持续渴望所造成的五个长期变化的担忧。此外,尽管在2008年严重的金融危机后吸取了惨痛的教训,但作者提出的经验证据表明,许多行业,如汽车贷款和抵押贷款债券,在很大程度上没有受到这场危机的影响,可能在下一次经济衰退中面临风险。本文基于原始数据来源和学术研究。作者正在继续与其他专家进行对话,以推动研究,并欢迎感兴趣的各方联系。主题:金融危机和金融市场历史、统计方法关键发现•缺乏做市和其他监管变化,这将阻碍下一次经济衰退中的价格发现。•掩盖潜在抵押品的恶化和后视镜分析。•评级机构玩的旧游戏的新版本。•资产负债不匹配结构数量激增。•金融机构合规方面的监管变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Fixed Income
Journal of Fixed Income Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Journal of Fixed Income (JFI) provides sophisticated analytical research and case studies on bond instruments of all types – investment grade, high-yield, municipals, ABSs and MBSs, and structured products like CDOs and credit derivatives. Industry experts offer detailed models and analysis on fixed income structuring, performance tracking, and risk management. JFI keeps you on the front line of fixed income practices by: •Staying current on the cutting edge of fixed income markets •Managing your bond portfolios more efficiently •Evaluating interest rate strategies and manage interest rate risk •Gaining insights into the risk profile of structured products.
期刊最新文献
How Making Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities Portable May Impact Housing and Mortgage-Backed Securities Investors Gradient Boosting Model for Corporate Default Integrating Multiple Signals in Systematic Corporate Bond Selection Strategies Bond Duration and Convexity under Stochastic Interest Rates and Credit Spreads Is Bloomberg’s Credit Default Swaps Model Superior in Predicting Defaults?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1