{"title":"Filling the gap in knowledge of early Miocene continental molluscs of southwest Europe: gastropods from Ribesalbes-Alcora Basin (Spain)","authors":"Joaquín Albesa, J. M. Lopez, Vicente, D., Crespo","doi":"10.3140/bull.geosci.1856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"such as those of Vallés-Penedés, Ebro, Calatayud-Daroca, Teruel, Duero and Tajo, as well as smaller ones such as Cabriel, Fortuna, Guadix-Baza and Granada (Agustí 2018). Continental sediments of Aragonian age (end of the early Miocene to middle Miocene; mammal biozones MN4 to MN7/8) are represented in many of these basins (Agustí 2018). While mammal associations have been studied extensively in several palaeontological sites, the malacological record is comparatively poor documented. The few studies carried out on the malacological assemblages recorded in sediments today attributed to an Aragonian age are to some extent outdated (Vilanova y Piera 1859; Royo Gómez 1922, 1926, 1928; Jodot 1959). Also, many of sites and faunas documented in these works could not be precisely located. The available references accurately located and dated correspond to sites attributed to the middle Aragonian of the Tajo Basin (Truc 1977) and the upper Aragonian of the Duero Basin (González Delgado et al. 1986, Civis et al. 1989). The references from the early Aragonian are practically inexistent and correspond to isolated cites or recent multidisciplinary studies in the Ribesalbes-Alcora Basin (Peñalver et al. 2016, ÁlvarezParra et al. 2021). In line with the above, the available data on the mala cological content of the sediments of the Ribesalbes-Alcora Basin (Fig. 1A) are mostly old and very scarce. The first one corresponds to Vilanova y Piera (1859) who studied the materials in the “Balsa de Fanzaraˮ (the classical name for the Cenozoic sediments of the basin) and the nearby area of Alcalá. He cited the generic presence of “lymneasˮ, “planorbis” and “helicesˮ (Vilanova y Piera 1859: p. 44), and more specifically a single specimen of Planorbis rotundatus Brongniart, 1810 from the “Balsa de Fanzara”, which is shown on a plate alongside with four species belonging to the Alcalá area. Royo Gómez (1922) included a brief reference to the sediments of the studied area correcting the determination of Planorbis rotundatus to","PeriodicalId":9332,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Geosciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3140/bull.geosci.1856","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
such as those of Vallés-Penedés, Ebro, Calatayud-Daroca, Teruel, Duero and Tajo, as well as smaller ones such as Cabriel, Fortuna, Guadix-Baza and Granada (Agustí 2018). Continental sediments of Aragonian age (end of the early Miocene to middle Miocene; mammal biozones MN4 to MN7/8) are represented in many of these basins (Agustí 2018). While mammal associations have been studied extensively in several palaeontological sites, the malacological record is comparatively poor documented. The few studies carried out on the malacological assemblages recorded in sediments today attributed to an Aragonian age are to some extent outdated (Vilanova y Piera 1859; Royo Gómez 1922, 1926, 1928; Jodot 1959). Also, many of sites and faunas documented in these works could not be precisely located. The available references accurately located and dated correspond to sites attributed to the middle Aragonian of the Tajo Basin (Truc 1977) and the upper Aragonian of the Duero Basin (González Delgado et al. 1986, Civis et al. 1989). The references from the early Aragonian are practically inexistent and correspond to isolated cites or recent multidisciplinary studies in the Ribesalbes-Alcora Basin (Peñalver et al. 2016, ÁlvarezParra et al. 2021). In line with the above, the available data on the mala cological content of the sediments of the Ribesalbes-Alcora Basin (Fig. 1A) are mostly old and very scarce. The first one corresponds to Vilanova y Piera (1859) who studied the materials in the “Balsa de Fanzaraˮ (the classical name for the Cenozoic sediments of the basin) and the nearby area of Alcalá. He cited the generic presence of “lymneasˮ, “planorbis” and “helicesˮ (Vilanova y Piera 1859: p. 44), and more specifically a single specimen of Planorbis rotundatus Brongniart, 1810 from the “Balsa de Fanzara”, which is shown on a plate alongside with four species belonging to the Alcalá area. Royo Gómez (1922) included a brief reference to the sediments of the studied area correcting the determination of Planorbis rotundatus to
例如瓦尔萨-佩内德-卡、埃布罗、卡拉塔尤德-达罗卡、特鲁埃尔、杜埃罗和塔霍,以及较小的卡布里埃尔、福尔图纳、瓜迪克斯-巴扎和格拉纳达(Agustí 2018)。阿拉贡时代(早中新世末至中新世中期)的陆相沉积物;这些盆地中有许多哺乳动物生物带(MN4至MN7/8) (Agustí 2018)。虽然哺乳动物的关联已经在几个古生物遗址进行了广泛的研究,但线虫学的记录相对较少。目前对阿拉贡时代沉积物中记录的虫藻学组合进行的少数研究在某种程度上是过时的(Vilanova y Piera 1859;罗约Gómez 1922、1926、1928;Jodot 1959)。此外,这些作品中记录的许多地点和动物无法精确定位。现有的准确定位和年代的参考资料对应于Tajo盆地的中阿拉贡期(Truc 1977)和Duero盆地的上阿拉贡期(González Delgado et al. 1986, Civis et al. 1989)。来自阿拉贡期早期的文献几乎不存在,与Ribesalbes-Alcora盆地的孤立城市或最近的多学科研究相对应(Peñalver et al. 2016, ÁlvarezParra et al. 2021)。综上所述,关于Ribesalbes-Alcora盆地沉积物的mala生态学含量的现有数据(图1A)大多是古老的,非常稀少。第一个对应于Vilanova y Piera(1859),他研究了“Balsa de Fanzara”(盆地新生代沉积物的经典名称)和alcal附近地区的物质。他引用了“lyneas”,“planorbis”和“helices”的普遍存在(Vilanova y Piera 1859:第44页),更具体地说,1810年来自“Balsa de Fanzara”的planorbis rotundatus Brongniart的单一标本,与属于alcal地区的四个物种一起显示在一个盘子上。Royo Gómez(1922)包含了对研究区域沉积物的简要参考,纠正了对圆形planoris的测定
期刊介绍:
The Bulletin of Geosciences is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles, and short contributions concerning palaeoenvironmental geology, including palaeontology, stratigraphy, sedimentology, palaeogeography, palaeoecology, palaeoclimatology, geochemistry, mineralogy, geophysics, and related fields. All papers are subject to international peer review, and acceptance is based on quality alone.