Transvaginal Urethrolysis As A Treatment Option For Women With Recurrent Cystitis

Q3 Medicine Siriraj Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.33192/smj.v75i5.261230
Sunporn Boonwong, Atichet Sawangchareon, Patkawat Ramart
{"title":"Transvaginal Urethrolysis As A Treatment Option For Women With Recurrent Cystitis","authors":"Sunporn Boonwong, Atichet Sawangchareon, Patkawat Ramart","doi":"10.33192/smj.v75i5.261230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To demonstrate the outcome of transvaginal urethrolysis as a treatment option for women with recurrent cystitis, which could be caused from voiding problems. In the case of a failure of non-invasive treatment, the surgical procedure to decrease outlet resistance may have a role.\nMaterials and Methods: Between January 2016 and December 2020, women with recurrent cystitis who underwent urethrolysis at Siriraj Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Only women who were followed-up for more than 6 months were analyzed. Cure was defined by no clinical symptoms of cystitis, no pyuria on urine analysis, and/or negative urine culture during the follow-up period.\nResults: In total, 52 women underwent transvaginal urethrolysis. The overall cure rate was observed 53.9% (28 cases) at a median follow-up time of 11.9 (6–59) months. Eighteen of the 44 cases (40.9%) who underwent a video urodynamics study showed bladder outlet obstruction, defined as a Solomon–Greenwell bladder outlet obstruction index of more than 5. None of the characteristics or urodynamics parameters showed statistically significant differences between the cure and failure groups. Postoperative urinary incontinence was reported in 14 cases (26.9%) but showed no statistical difference between the cure and failure group (p = 0.748).\nConclusion: Bladder outlet obstruction is a common cause of recurrent cystitis. Transvaginal urethrolysis may have a role as treatment for women with recurrent cystitis from voiding dysfunction who have failed non- and less-invasive treatments. Here, the overall cure rate was 53.8%. A factor associated with the cure rate could not be demonstrated in this study.","PeriodicalId":37270,"journal":{"name":"Siriraj Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siriraj Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v75i5.261230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To demonstrate the outcome of transvaginal urethrolysis as a treatment option for women with recurrent cystitis, which could be caused from voiding problems. In the case of a failure of non-invasive treatment, the surgical procedure to decrease outlet resistance may have a role. Materials and Methods: Between January 2016 and December 2020, women with recurrent cystitis who underwent urethrolysis at Siriraj Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Only women who were followed-up for more than 6 months were analyzed. Cure was defined by no clinical symptoms of cystitis, no pyuria on urine analysis, and/or negative urine culture during the follow-up period. Results: In total, 52 women underwent transvaginal urethrolysis. The overall cure rate was observed 53.9% (28 cases) at a median follow-up time of 11.9 (6–59) months. Eighteen of the 44 cases (40.9%) who underwent a video urodynamics study showed bladder outlet obstruction, defined as a Solomon–Greenwell bladder outlet obstruction index of more than 5. None of the characteristics or urodynamics parameters showed statistically significant differences between the cure and failure groups. Postoperative urinary incontinence was reported in 14 cases (26.9%) but showed no statistical difference between the cure and failure group (p = 0.748). Conclusion: Bladder outlet obstruction is a common cause of recurrent cystitis. Transvaginal urethrolysis may have a role as treatment for women with recurrent cystitis from voiding dysfunction who have failed non- and less-invasive treatments. Here, the overall cure rate was 53.8%. A factor associated with the cure rate could not be demonstrated in this study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经阴道尿道溶解术作为女性复发性膀胱炎的治疗选择
目的:证明经阴道尿道切开术作为治疗复发性膀胱炎的一种选择的效果,复发性膀膀胱炎可能是由排尿问题引起的。在非侵入性治疗失败的情况下,降低出口阻力的外科手术可能会发挥作用。材料和方法:对2016年1月至2020年12月期间在Siriraj医院接受尿道切开术的复发性膀胱炎女性进行回顾性分析。仅对随访时间超过6个月的女性进行了分析。治愈的定义是在随访期间没有膀胱炎的临床症状,尿液分析中没有脓尿,和/或尿液培养阴性。结果:总共有52名妇女接受了经阴道尿道切开术。总治愈率为53.9%(28例),中位随访时间为11.9(6-59)个月。在接受视频尿动力学研究的44例病例中,有18例(40.9%)显示膀胱出口梗阻,定义为Solomon–Greenwell膀胱出口梗阻指数超过5。在治愈组和失败组之间,没有任何特征或尿动力学参数显示出统计学上的显著差异。术后尿失禁14例(26.9%),但治愈组和失败组之间无统计学差异(p=0.748)。结论:膀胱出口梗阻是复发性膀胱炎的常见原因。经阴道尿道溶解术可能对因排尿功能障碍而复发性膀胱炎的女性具有治疗作用,这些女性未通过非侵入性和微创治疗。总治愈率为53.8%。本研究无法证明与治愈率相关的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Siriraj Medical Journal
Siriraj Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Incidences, Characteristics, Management and Outcomes of Different Subtypes of Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients Admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit: A Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study Optimizing Perioperative Care for Elderly Surgical Patients: A Review of Strategies and Evidence-Based Practices Comparison between the Standard Teaching and the Thai Version of Blended Teaching on Basic Airway Management in Siriraj Medical Students Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) and Outcomes in Preoperative Fast-track Geriatric Patients with Hip Fracture: A Single-center Retrospective Study Effectiveness of Smartphone Applications vs Conventional Care in Warfarin Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Time in the Therapeutic Range
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1