IKEA vs Trophy effect – an experimental comparison

IF 2.7 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Consumer Marketing Pub Date : 2023-03-28 DOI:10.1108/jcm-09-2021-4881
Christoph Bühren, M. Pleßner
{"title":"IKEA vs Trophy effect – an experimental comparison","authors":"Christoph Bühren, M. Pleßner","doi":"10.1108/jcm-09-2021-4881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nWhat if companies try to combine the IKEA and Trophy winner effects? The purpose of this study is to understand the similarities and differences between both effects. This is not only theoretically but also practically important for the way that companies interact with their customers.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nSuccessful work – invested either to create or to obtain a product – increases the customers’ valuation of the product. This phenomenon known as the IKEA or Trophy winner effect. This study directly compares both effects using experiments with two different products (paper planes and 3D puzzles). Moreover, this study tests whether they reinforce each other.\n\n\nFindings\nThe Trophy winner effect looms larger than the IKEA effect for inexpensive items. For slightly more expensive products, this study finds a Trophy loser effect. Positive emotions of trophy winners drive the results for inexpensive products, whereas negative emotions of trophy losers drive the results for slightly more expensive products.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe relevance of the IKEA and Trophy effects is influenced by the type of product. Customers’ labor invested in the product itself is of greater importance the more expensive the product is. As soon as customers interpret the interaction with other customers as competition, the effect on valuation can be substantial even for inexpensive products. Future studies could try to replicate our results with different product categories.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAlthough the IKEA and Trophy effects are no new phenomena in consumer psychology and behavioral economics, they have not been compared to each other or combined yet. The results are useful for researchers and practitioners alike. They yield implications for product customization and customer empowerment.\n","PeriodicalId":35923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-09-2021-4881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose What if companies try to combine the IKEA and Trophy winner effects? The purpose of this study is to understand the similarities and differences between both effects. This is not only theoretically but also practically important for the way that companies interact with their customers. Design/methodology/approach Successful work – invested either to create or to obtain a product – increases the customers’ valuation of the product. This phenomenon known as the IKEA or Trophy winner effect. This study directly compares both effects using experiments with two different products (paper planes and 3D puzzles). Moreover, this study tests whether they reinforce each other. Findings The Trophy winner effect looms larger than the IKEA effect for inexpensive items. For slightly more expensive products, this study finds a Trophy loser effect. Positive emotions of trophy winners drive the results for inexpensive products, whereas negative emotions of trophy losers drive the results for slightly more expensive products. Research limitations/implications The relevance of the IKEA and Trophy effects is influenced by the type of product. Customers’ labor invested in the product itself is of greater importance the more expensive the product is. As soon as customers interpret the interaction with other customers as competition, the effect on valuation can be substantial even for inexpensive products. Future studies could try to replicate our results with different product categories. Originality/value Although the IKEA and Trophy effects are no new phenomena in consumer psychology and behavioral economics, they have not been compared to each other or combined yet. The results are useful for researchers and practitioners alike. They yield implications for product customization and customer empowerment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宜家vs奖杯效应——一个实验性的比较
目的如果公司试图将宜家和奖杯得主的效果结合起来怎么办?本研究的目的是了解这两种效果之间的异同。这不仅在理论上很重要,而且在实践中对公司与客户互动的方式也很重要。设计/方法论/方法成功的工作——投资于创造或获得产品——提高了客户对产品的估价。这种现象被称为宜家或奖杯赢家效应。这项研究使用两种不同产品(纸平面和3D拼图)的实验直接比较了这两种效果。此外,这项研究还测试了它们是否相互强化。发现奖杯得主效应比宜家对廉价商品的影响更大。对于稍微贵一点的产品,这项研究发现了奖杯失败者效应。奖杯获得者的积极情绪会推动廉价产品的结果,而奖杯失败者的消极情绪会推动稍微贵一点的产品的结果。研究局限性/含义宜家和奖杯效应的相关性受产品类型的影响。产品越贵,客户在产品本身投入的劳动力就越重要。一旦客户将与其他客户的互动理解为竞争,即使是价格低廉的产品,对估值的影响也会很大。未来的研究可以尝试用不同的产品类别来复制我们的结果。创意/价值尽管宜家和奖杯效应在消费者心理学和行为经济学中并不是什么新现象,但它们还没有被相互比较或结合起来。研究结果对研究人员和从业者都很有用。它们对产品定制和客户授权产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Consumer Marketing
Journal of Consumer Marketing Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: ■Consumer behaviour ■Customer policy and service ■Practical case studies to illustrate concepts ■The latest thinking and research in marketing planning ■The marketing of services worldwide
期刊最新文献
Generation Z’s intention to use digital fashion items in the Metaverse Conspicuous compensatory consumption: scale development and initial validation The adoption of smart services: do privacy concerns, trust in benevolence and usage experience matter? In smartness we trust: consumer experience, smart device personalization and privacy balance Examining process mechanism of celebrity attributes on brand advocacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1