The ‘Lieutenants’ of Coaching: How Materiality Shapes Coach Developers’ Practices

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Somatechnics Pub Date : 2021-06-29 DOI:10.3366/soma.2021.0355
J. Maclean
{"title":"The ‘Lieutenants’ of Coaching: How Materiality Shapes Coach Developers’ Practices","authors":"J. Maclean","doi":"10.3366/soma.2021.0355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One might assume that sport coaches are experts in coaching relationally as they do, after all, have to consider how their lieutenants work together in any given practice. If true, then coach developers, who coach the coaches, might be thought of as superior experts in relational provision. If also true, then a relational inquiry into coach education programmes is necessary for conceptualising learning. But previous conceptualisations of learning have neither considered relational analyses nor viewed learning as something that is not derivative from the coach. In this article, I examine how materials participate in and the ways materiality shapes two coach developers’ practices. Methodologically, I draw inspiration from actor-network theory, which is a sociomaterial approach that focuses on the relations of humans and nonhumans in practices. Methods include the ‘interview to the double’ ( Nicolini 2009 ), followed by observations during two level one coach education programmes: children and youth. Two vignettes of cones and the CD-ROM describe how social and material relations come together and shape coach developers’ practices in surprising and unexpected ways. The coach developers grappled with their ‘educator’ role so that coaches were better prepared to articulate the materiality of practices. Based on my analysis, I conclude by making a case for a material engagement with coach development.","PeriodicalId":43420,"journal":{"name":"Somatechnics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatechnics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/soma.2021.0355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

One might assume that sport coaches are experts in coaching relationally as they do, after all, have to consider how their lieutenants work together in any given practice. If true, then coach developers, who coach the coaches, might be thought of as superior experts in relational provision. If also true, then a relational inquiry into coach education programmes is necessary for conceptualising learning. But previous conceptualisations of learning have neither considered relational analyses nor viewed learning as something that is not derivative from the coach. In this article, I examine how materials participate in and the ways materiality shapes two coach developers’ practices. Methodologically, I draw inspiration from actor-network theory, which is a sociomaterial approach that focuses on the relations of humans and nonhumans in practices. Methods include the ‘interview to the double’ ( Nicolini 2009 ), followed by observations during two level one coach education programmes: children and youth. Two vignettes of cones and the CD-ROM describe how social and material relations come together and shape coach developers’ practices in surprising and unexpected ways. The coach developers grappled with their ‘educator’ role so that coaches were better prepared to articulate the materiality of practices. Based on my analysis, I conclude by making a case for a material engagement with coach development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教练的“助手”:物质性如何塑造教练开发人员的实践
有人可能会认为,体育教练是关系教练方面的专家,毕竟,他们必须考虑在任何特定的训练中,他们的副手是如何合作的。如果这是真的,那么教练开发人员,指导教练的人,可能会被认为是关系提供方面的高级专家。如果也是如此,那么对教练教育计划的关系调查对于概念化学习是必要的。但是,以前的学习概念既没有考虑到关系分析,也没有把学习看作不是来自教练的东西。在这篇文章中,我研究了材料是如何参与的,以及材料是如何塑造两个教练开发人员的实践的。在方法论上,我从行动者网络理论(actor-network theory)中汲取灵感,这是一种关注实践中人类和非人类关系的社会材料方法。方法包括“双重访谈”(Nicolini 2009),随后在两个一级教练教育项目中进行观察:儿童和青少年。锥体和CD-ROM的两个小插图描述了社会和物质关系如何结合在一起,并以令人惊讶和意想不到的方式塑造了教练开发人员的实践。教练开发人员努力解决他们的“教育者”角色,这样教练就能更好地准备好阐明实践的重要性。根据我的分析,我最后提出了一个案例,说明与教练发展的实质性接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Somatechnics
Somatechnics SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Joshua St. Pierre, Cheap Talk: Disability and the Politics of Communication Critical Disability Studies, Corporeality and Child Maltreatment: Theorising the Somatechnics of Self and Other The Many Names and Shapes of Water: Emergent Narratives on a Non-existing Water Body in Latin America The Somatechnics of Water: Part 2 Permeable Housing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1