Education as Treatment for Chronic Pain in Survivors of Trauma in Cambodia: Results of a Randomized Controlled Outcome Trial

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS International Journal of Conflict and Violence Pub Date : 2019-06-18 DOI:10.4119/UNIBI/IJCV.655
U. Harlacher, P. Polatin, Sopheap Taing, P. Phana, P. Sok, Chim Sothera
{"title":"Education as Treatment for Chronic Pain in Survivors of Trauma in Cambodia: Results of a Randomized Controlled Outcome Trial","authors":"U. Harlacher, P. Polatin, Sopheap Taing, P. Phana, P. Sok, Chim Sothera","doi":"10.4119/UNIBI/IJCV.655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the hypothesis that pain is a stand-alone problem, not just a symptom of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), the effect of group psycho-education (“pain school”) for survivors of the Khmer Rouge regime with pain-PTSD comorbidity was tested in Cambodia in 2015. After baseline assessment comprising pain-related measures (Brief Pain Inventory, Disability Rating Index) and measures for PTSD, anxiety, depression, and distress, 113 subjects were randomized to a waitlist control group (CG, n = 58) and a treatment group (TG, n = 55). After treatment TG improved significantly, with clinically relevant effect size. Effect size was, however, substantially lower than in two prior pilot trials, and the improvement was not maintained at six-month follow-up. The main reason for this is hypothesized to be that the intervention had been delivered in too condensed a format. It is concluded that treatment addressing pain can also ameliorate mental health problems, implying that more attention should be paid to pain treatment for subjects suffering from pain/PTSD comorbidity.","PeriodicalId":45781,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Conflict and Violence","volume":"13 1","pages":"655"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Conflict and Violence","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/IJCV.655","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Based on the hypothesis that pain is a stand-alone problem, not just a symptom of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), the effect of group psycho-education (“pain school”) for survivors of the Khmer Rouge regime with pain-PTSD comorbidity was tested in Cambodia in 2015. After baseline assessment comprising pain-related measures (Brief Pain Inventory, Disability Rating Index) and measures for PTSD, anxiety, depression, and distress, 113 subjects were randomized to a waitlist control group (CG, n = 58) and a treatment group (TG, n = 55). After treatment TG improved significantly, with clinically relevant effect size. Effect size was, however, substantially lower than in two prior pilot trials, and the improvement was not maintained at six-month follow-up. The main reason for this is hypothesized to be that the intervention had been delivered in too condensed a format. It is concluded that treatment addressing pain can also ameliorate mental health problems, implying that more attention should be paid to pain treatment for subjects suffering from pain/PTSD comorbidity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育治疗柬埔寨创伤幸存者的慢性疼痛:一项随机对照结果试验的结果
基于疼痛是一个独立的问题,而不仅仅是创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的症状这一假设,2015年在柬埔寨测试了集体心理教育(“疼痛学校”)对患有疼痛PTSD合并症的红色高棉政权幸存者的影响。在包括疼痛相关指标(简要疼痛清单、残疾评定指数)和创伤后应激障碍、焦虑、抑郁和痛苦指标的基线评估后,113名受试者被随机分为等待名单对照组(CG,n=58)和治疗组(TG,n=55)。治疗后TG明显改善,具有临床相关的疗效大小。然而,效果大小大大低于之前的两次试点试验,并且在六个月的随访中没有保持改善。据推测,造成这种情况的主要原因是干预措施的形式过于精简。结论是,解决疼痛的治疗也可以改善心理健康问题,这意味着应该更多地关注患有疼痛/PPTSD合并症的受试者的疼痛治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Identity, Significance, Sensation or Justice? Different Motives which Attract to Radical Ideas Social Worldviews and Personal Beliefs as Risk Factors for Radicalization: A Comparison Between Muslims and non-Muslims Living in Poland Change in Juvenile Offending Versatility Predicted by Individual, Familial, and Environmental Risks Justice Sensitivity Is Positively and Negatively Related to Prejudice and Discrimination Online Extremism: Research Trends in Internet Activism, Radicalization, and Counter-Strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1