Profiling lexical frame use in NSF grant proposal abstracts

Chris Nuttall
{"title":"Profiling lexical frame use in NSF grant proposal abstracts","authors":"Chris Nuttall","doi":"10.1016/j.acorp.2021.100009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Grant proposals seeking research funding represent a high-stakes written academic register for professional scholars. Unfortunately, limited research has been undertaken to inform the productive knowledge required to write quality grant proposals. The little research that exists centers on the broader rhetorical features of the proposals while ignoring their component linguistic features. Among these linguistic features are lexical frames, or discontinuous word sequences (e.g. <em>the * of the</em>). Lexical frames are phraseological building blocks required for constructing the broader rhetorical features of grant proposals. For this reason, investigating lexical frame use in grant proposals is helpful for further informing productive knowledge related to writing quality grant proposals.</p><p>The purpose of this study is to profile lexical frame use in National Science Foundation grant proposal abstracts, which serve as public-facing documents used to justify continued dispersal of federal research funds in the Untied States. This is done by following a frame-first approach to comprehensively analyze frequently occurring four-word lexical frames in a corpus of NSF grant proposal abstracts. Results indicate a few general characteristics connected to lexical frame use in NSF abstracts. First, many of the frames exhibit fixed variability in addition to being either unpredictable or highly unpredictable. Furthermore, there are relatively few function word frames (e.g. <em>the * of this</em>) when compared to content word based frames (e.g. <em>goal * this project</em>) and verb based frames (e.g. <em>the * will be</em>). Finally, the majority of frames are functionally referential while there are very few discourse organizing frames. These characteristics are attributable to the short length of the abstracts as well as the fact that the abstracts exhibit a relatively small set of rhetorical moves.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72254,"journal":{"name":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666799121000095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Grant proposals seeking research funding represent a high-stakes written academic register for professional scholars. Unfortunately, limited research has been undertaken to inform the productive knowledge required to write quality grant proposals. The little research that exists centers on the broader rhetorical features of the proposals while ignoring their component linguistic features. Among these linguistic features are lexical frames, or discontinuous word sequences (e.g. the * of the). Lexical frames are phraseological building blocks required for constructing the broader rhetorical features of grant proposals. For this reason, investigating lexical frame use in grant proposals is helpful for further informing productive knowledge related to writing quality grant proposals.

The purpose of this study is to profile lexical frame use in National Science Foundation grant proposal abstracts, which serve as public-facing documents used to justify continued dispersal of federal research funds in the Untied States. This is done by following a frame-first approach to comprehensively analyze frequently occurring four-word lexical frames in a corpus of NSF grant proposal abstracts. Results indicate a few general characteristics connected to lexical frame use in NSF abstracts. First, many of the frames exhibit fixed variability in addition to being either unpredictable or highly unpredictable. Furthermore, there are relatively few function word frames (e.g. the * of this) when compared to content word based frames (e.g. goal * this project) and verb based frames (e.g. the * will be). Finally, the majority of frames are functionally referential while there are very few discourse organizing frames. These characteristics are attributable to the short length of the abstracts as well as the fact that the abstracts exhibit a relatively small set of rhetorical moves.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖析词法框架在NSF拨款建议摘要中的使用
寻求研究经费的拨款提案代表了专业学者的高风险书面学术注册。不幸的是,在编写高质量赠款提案所需的生产性知识方面,开展的研究有限。现存的少量研究集中在提案的更广泛的修辞特征上,而忽略了它们的组成语言特征。这些语言特征包括词汇框架,或不连续的单词序列(如the的*)。词汇框架是构建奖助金提案中更广泛的修辞特征所必需的短语构建块。由于这个原因,调查词汇框架在奖助金提案中的使用,有助于进一步告知与写作高质量奖助金提案相关的生产性知识。本研究的目的是分析美国国家科学基金会拨款提案摘要中词汇框架的使用情况,这些提案摘要作为面向公众的文件,用于证明美国联邦研究基金的持续分散。这是通过遵循框架优先的方法来全面分析NSF拨款提案摘要语料库中频繁出现的四词词汇框架来完成的。研究结果显示了NSF摘要中词汇框架使用的一些普遍特征。首先,除了不可预测或高度不可预测之外,许多框架还表现出固定的可变性。此外,与基于内容词的框架(例如目标* this project)和基于动词的框架(例如* will be)相比,功能词框架(例如this的*)相对较少。最后,大部分框架都具有功能指称性,而话语组织框架却很少。这些特点是由于摘要的篇幅较短,以及摘要的修辞手法相对较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Corpus Linguistics
Applied Corpus Linguistics Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
70 days
期刊最新文献
Breach of pacta sunt servanda: A corpus-assisted analysis of newspaper discourse on the AUKUS agreement Identifying ChatGPT-generated texts in EFL students’ writing: Through comparative analysis of linguistic fingerprints English podcasts for schoolchildren and their vocabulary demands Capturing chronological variation in L2 speech through lexical measurements and regression analysis Investigating spoken classroom interactions in linguistically heterogeneous learning groups – An interdisciplinary approach to process video-based data in second language acquisition classrooms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1