Optimisation of Off-Soil Tomato Fertilization and Substrate Recipes

E. Tabet, P. Sleiman, C. Hosri, S. Rouphael, Lina Farah
{"title":"Optimisation of Off-Soil Tomato Fertilization and Substrate Recipes","authors":"E. Tabet, P. Sleiman, C. Hosri, S. Rouphael, Lina Farah","doi":"10.30560/as.v2n1p243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Substrate and fertilizers recipes and their balances are two factors affecting the growth of hydroponic crops. However, the responses of crop cultivars to different substrate and fertilizer are less clear. This study was aimed at assessing the different responses of tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) cultivars to the different substrate and fertilizer supply. The study was carried out at the Centre de Recherche et de Formation Agricole (CRFA) of the Lebanese University to test three types of substrates; S1 (100% coconut fiber), S2 (50% coconut fiber and 50% grape marc) and S3 (25% coconut fiber and 75% grape marc). As well as three fertilization recipes; F1 (ARTC), F2 (University of Arizona) and F3 (Farmer) were applied in order to be able to recommend the best substrates and fertilizers adapted to the conditions of cultivation off-soil. The production cycle was divided into three phases; phase1 (0-6 weeks), phase2 (6-12 weeks) and phase3 (> 12 weeks). Various parameters were measured throughout the cycle; stem length, number and distance between nodes, number and distance between flower buds, and fruit yield. Results for stem length and number of nodes showed good interaction in favor of F2-S1 throughout the cycle. As far as the distance between nodes is concerned, F1 is the best despite the fact that F2 is more economical and S1 showed a superiority. The number of flower buds is positively affected by F1 and F2 and S1 and S3. As far as the distance between floral buds is concerned, F1 and F2 are the best, F2 is the most profitable and S2 played a favorable role in the distance between floral buds. The number of fruits is in favor of F1 and F2, S1 is the best. In terms of plant yield, F2 is the most favorable and S2 is the best. After that, F2 is the best recipe and F1 is the most economical. S1 and S2 did well in the development of the tomato plant by their proper physico-chemical properties. S1 is slightly better.","PeriodicalId":7435,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Science","volume":"2 1","pages":"243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30560/as.v2n1p243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Substrate and fertilizers recipes and their balances are two factors affecting the growth of hydroponic crops. However, the responses of crop cultivars to different substrate and fertilizer are less clear. This study was aimed at assessing the different responses of tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) cultivars to the different substrate and fertilizer supply. The study was carried out at the Centre de Recherche et de Formation Agricole (CRFA) of the Lebanese University to test three types of substrates; S1 (100% coconut fiber), S2 (50% coconut fiber and 50% grape marc) and S3 (25% coconut fiber and 75% grape marc). As well as three fertilization recipes; F1 (ARTC), F2 (University of Arizona) and F3 (Farmer) were applied in order to be able to recommend the best substrates and fertilizers adapted to the conditions of cultivation off-soil. The production cycle was divided into three phases; phase1 (0-6 weeks), phase2 (6-12 weeks) and phase3 (> 12 weeks). Various parameters were measured throughout the cycle; stem length, number and distance between nodes, number and distance between flower buds, and fruit yield. Results for stem length and number of nodes showed good interaction in favor of F2-S1 throughout the cycle. As far as the distance between nodes is concerned, F1 is the best despite the fact that F2 is more economical and S1 showed a superiority. The number of flower buds is positively affected by F1 and F2 and S1 and S3. As far as the distance between floral buds is concerned, F1 and F2 are the best, F2 is the most profitable and S2 played a favorable role in the distance between floral buds. The number of fruits is in favor of F1 and F2, S1 is the best. In terms of plant yield, F2 is the most favorable and S2 is the best. After that, F2 is the best recipe and F1 is the most economical. S1 and S2 did well in the development of the tomato plant by their proper physico-chemical properties. S1 is slightly better.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
番茄离地施肥与基质配方优化
基质和肥料配比及其平衡是影响水培作物生长的两个因素。然而,作物品种对不同基质和肥料的响应尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨番茄品种对不同基质和施肥的不同反应。这项研究是在黎巴嫩大学农业研究与发展中心进行的,目的是测试三种类型的基质;S1(100%椰子纤维),S2(50%椰子纤维和50%葡萄马克)和S3(25%椰子纤维和75%葡萄马克)。以及三种施肥配方;选用F1 (ARTC)、F2 (University of Arizona)和F3 (Farmer),以推荐最适合离地栽培条件的基质和肥料。生产周期分为三个阶段;第一阶段(0-6周),第二阶段(6-12周)和第三阶段(bb0 -12周)。在整个循环中测量各种参数;茎长、节数和节距、花蕾数和节距与果实产量有关。茎长和节数在整个循环中表现出良好的相互作用,有利于F2-S1。就节点之间的距离而言,F1是最好的,但F2更经济,S1更有优势。F1和F2、S1和S3对花蕾数有显著正影响。就花芽间距而言,F1和F2是最好的,F2是最有利的,S2对花芽间距发挥了有利的作用。果数以F1和F2有利,S1最好。就植株产量而言,F2最有利,S2最好。在那之后,F2是最好的食谱,F1是最经济的。S1和S2以其适宜的理化性状在番茄植株发育中表现良好。S1稍微好一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
The Effectiveness of Two Hydroponically Fodder Production of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) as Compared to Open Field System in Mount Lebanon Impact of Ecological Factors on Water quality goals The Effect of Various Compositions of Planting Media On The Growht of Red Calliandra Seedlings (Calliandra calotrhyrsus Meissen) Spreadability, Total Dissolved Solids and Likeability of Mango Jam with a Combination of Mango Flesh and Peel Arum Manis (Mangifera Indicates L) The effect of three plant extracts in the control of Khapra beetle ( Trogoderma granarium Everts) (Coleoptera Dermistidae)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1