The Karabakh Flashpoint: Turkish Authoritarian Rule and the Recurrence of Genocide

Q3 Social Sciences Genocide Studies International Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.3138/gsi-2023-0721
Ani Garabed Ohanian
{"title":"The Karabakh Flashpoint: Turkish Authoritarian Rule and the Recurrence of Genocide","authors":"Ani Garabed Ohanian","doi":"10.3138/gsi-2023-0721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, currently a serious humanitarian crisis, is often categorized as a post-Soviet conflict. This article challenges that conceptualization and reframes the historiography of Nagorno-Karabakh by shedding light on Bolshevik-Kemalist collaboration in the South Caucasus. The true flashpoint of the conflict stems back to 1917, a period of imperial decline, which occurred during the ongoing process of the Armenian Genocide. The cooperation between Turkish and Azerbaijani actors between 1917 to 1921 demonstrates the intent to undermine the Armenian national pattern in the Karabakh region, as well as other regions including Zangezur, and Nakhichevan. Present-day grievances reflect similar Turkish and Azerbaijani intentions. The collapse of the Russian, and Ottoman Empires had severe consequences for the Armenians of the Karabakh region, as Bolsheviks and Kemalists supported genocidal policies towards them. From a historical perspective, Bolshevik-Kemalist cooperation in the South Caucasus provides a disturbing precursor to the region’s current authoritarian actors and their impact on enflamed ethno-territorial tensions and the region’s cycles of stability.","PeriodicalId":40844,"journal":{"name":"Genocide Studies International","volume":"15 1","pages":"60 - 68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genocide Studies International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/gsi-2023-0721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, currently a serious humanitarian crisis, is often categorized as a post-Soviet conflict. This article challenges that conceptualization and reframes the historiography of Nagorno-Karabakh by shedding light on Bolshevik-Kemalist collaboration in the South Caucasus. The true flashpoint of the conflict stems back to 1917, a period of imperial decline, which occurred during the ongoing process of the Armenian Genocide. The cooperation between Turkish and Azerbaijani actors between 1917 to 1921 demonstrates the intent to undermine the Armenian national pattern in the Karabakh region, as well as other regions including Zangezur, and Nakhichevan. Present-day grievances reflect similar Turkish and Azerbaijani intentions. The collapse of the Russian, and Ottoman Empires had severe consequences for the Armenians of the Karabakh region, as Bolsheviks and Kemalists supported genocidal policies towards them. From a historical perspective, Bolshevik-Kemalist cooperation in the South Caucasus provides a disturbing precursor to the region’s current authoritarian actors and their impact on enflamed ethno-territorial tensions and the region’s cycles of stability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡拉巴赫热点:土耳其独裁统治与种族灭绝的重演
摘要:纳戈尔诺-卡拉巴赫冲突目前是一场严重的人道主义危机,通常被归类为后苏联冲突。本文通过揭示南高加索地区布尔什维克-凯末尔主义的合作,挑战了这一概念,并重新构建了纳戈尔诺-卡拉巴赫的史学。冲突的真正爆发点要追溯到1917年,这是一个帝国衰落的时期,发生在亚美尼亚种族灭绝的过程中。土耳其和阿塞拜疆行动者在1917年至1921年之间的合作表明意图破坏卡拉巴赫地区以及包括赞格祖尔和纳希切万在内的其他地区的亚美尼亚民族格局。如今的不满反映了土耳其和阿塞拜疆的类似意图。俄罗斯和奥斯曼帝国的崩溃给卡拉巴赫地区的亚美尼亚人带来了严重的后果,因为布尔什维克和凯末尔主义者支持对他们的种族灭绝政策。从历史的角度来看,布尔什维克-凯末尔主义在南高加索的合作为该地区目前的专制行为者及其对民族-领土紧张局势和该地区稳定周期的影响提供了一个令人不安的前兆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genocide Studies International
Genocide Studies International POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Armenian Genocide Studies: Development as a Field, Historiographic Appraisal, and the Road Ahead Penal Battalions and Genocidal Warfare: History's Warnings, Wagner's Global Footprint, and Ukraine What Obligation Does the Global Community Have to Prevent Genocide, and What Form(s) Should these Prevention Efforts Take? Quality Genocide Education in American Schools: An Armenian Lens for Hope From War Crimes to Crimes against Humanity and Genocide: Turkish Responsibility after World War I
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1