Expressing the Evaluation of Socially Contested Issues through Metaphor: Higher Education Reform

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Cognitive Semantics Pub Date : 2023-04-21 DOI:10.1163/23526416-bja10034
Jurga Cibulskienė
{"title":"Expressing the Evaluation of Socially Contested Issues through Metaphor: Higher Education Reform","authors":"Jurga Cibulskienė","doi":"10.1163/23526416-bja10034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nMetaphor may express a positive or negative evaluation (Charteris-Black, 2014; Musolff, 2016). The paper aims to study how the predicative function of metaphor is manifested in the discourse of contemporary social concerns. The study was carried out within the framework of Critical Metaphor Analysis (cma), which was employed in order to determine how metaphors reflect attitudes towards higher education reform in Lithuania. The results show that the concept quality is understood as an object and evaluated through bipolar oppositions where the first element of the opposition is positively connoted while the second acquires a negative connotation. The evaluation of the concept reform is carried out through the source domains of movement, living being, object and conflict and is based on whether metaphors are used by the proponents of the reform or by the opposition.","PeriodicalId":52227,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Semantics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-bja10034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metaphor may express a positive or negative evaluation (Charteris-Black, 2014; Musolff, 2016). The paper aims to study how the predicative function of metaphor is manifested in the discourse of contemporary social concerns. The study was carried out within the framework of Critical Metaphor Analysis (cma), which was employed in order to determine how metaphors reflect attitudes towards higher education reform in Lithuania. The results show that the concept quality is understood as an object and evaluated through bipolar oppositions where the first element of the opposition is positively connoted while the second acquires a negative connotation. The evaluation of the concept reform is carried out through the source domains of movement, living being, object and conflict and is based on whether metaphors are used by the proponents of the reform or by the opposition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用隐喻表达对社会争议问题的评价:高等教育改革
隐喻可以表达积极或消极的评价(Charteris Black,2014;Musolff,2016)。本文旨在研究隐喻的表语功能如何在当代社会关注的话语中得到体现。这项研究是在批判性隐喻分析(cma)的框架内进行的,该分析旨在确定隐喻如何反映立陶宛对高等教育改革的态度。结果表明,概念质量被理解为一个对象,并通过两极对立来评估,其中对立的第一个元素具有积极的内涵,而第二个元素具有消极的内涵。对概念改革的评估是通过运动、生命、客体和冲突的来源领域进行的,并基于改革的支持者还是反对者使用隐喻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Semantics
Cognitive Semantics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Overhauling Collostructional Analysis: Towards More Descriptive Simplicity and More Explanatory Adequacy Radial Representations of the Semantics of Reduplicative Constructions in Nigerian Pidgin (Naija) Words of Wonder: The Cognitive and Semantic Dimension of the Literal and Figurative Denominators for wonder in Old English Sources Inconsistency in Conceptual Metaphor Theory Speakers’ Gestures and Semantic Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1