Unsteady Aerodynamic Lift Force on a Pitching Wing: Experimental Measurement and Data Processing

IF 1.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Vibration Pub Date : 2023-01-04 DOI:10.3390/vibration6010003
P. Z. Csurcsia, M. F. Siddiqui, M. Runacres, T. De Troyer
{"title":"Unsteady Aerodynamic Lift Force on a Pitching Wing: Experimental Measurement and Data Processing","authors":"P. Z. Csurcsia, M. F. Siddiqui, M. Runacres, T. De Troyer","doi":"10.3390/vibration6010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work discusses the experimental challenges and processing of unsteady experiments for a pitching wing in the low-speed wind tunnel of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel. The setup used for unsteady experiments consisted of two independent devices: (a) a position control device to steer the pitch angle of the wing, and (b) a pressure measurement device to measure the aerodynamic loads. The position control setup can pitch the wing for a range of frequencies, amplitude, and offset levels. In this work, a NACA-0018 wing profile was used with an aspect ratio of 1.8. The position control and the pressure measurement setups operate independently of each other, necessitating advanced signal processing techniques to synchronize the pitch angle and the lift force. Furthermore, there is a (not well-documented) issue with the (sampling) clock frequency of the pressure measurement setup, which was resolved using a fully automated spectral analysis technique. The wing was pitched using a simple harmonic sine excitation signal at eight different offset levels (between 6° and 21°) for a fixed amplitude variation (std) of 6°. At each offset level, the wing was pitched at five different frequencies between 0.1 Hz and 2 Hz (that correspond to reduced frequencies k ranging from 0.006 to 0.125). All the experiments were conducted at a fixed chord-based Reynolds number of 2.85 × 105. The choice of operating parameters invokes the linear and nonlinear behavior of the wing. The linear unsteady measurements agreed with the analytical results. The unsteady pressure measurements at higher offset levels revealed the nonlinear aerodynamic phenomenon of dynamic stall. This confirms that a nonlinear and dynamic model is required to capture the salient characteristics of the lift force on a pitching wing.","PeriodicalId":75301,"journal":{"name":"Vibration","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vibration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vibration6010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work discusses the experimental challenges and processing of unsteady experiments for a pitching wing in the low-speed wind tunnel of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel. The setup used for unsteady experiments consisted of two independent devices: (a) a position control device to steer the pitch angle of the wing, and (b) a pressure measurement device to measure the aerodynamic loads. The position control setup can pitch the wing for a range of frequencies, amplitude, and offset levels. In this work, a NACA-0018 wing profile was used with an aspect ratio of 1.8. The position control and the pressure measurement setups operate independently of each other, necessitating advanced signal processing techniques to synchronize the pitch angle and the lift force. Furthermore, there is a (not well-documented) issue with the (sampling) clock frequency of the pressure measurement setup, which was resolved using a fully automated spectral analysis technique. The wing was pitched using a simple harmonic sine excitation signal at eight different offset levels (between 6° and 21°) for a fixed amplitude variation (std) of 6°. At each offset level, the wing was pitched at five different frequencies between 0.1 Hz and 2 Hz (that correspond to reduced frequencies k ranging from 0.006 to 0.125). All the experiments were conducted at a fixed chord-based Reynolds number of 2.85 × 105. The choice of operating parameters invokes the linear and nonlinear behavior of the wing. The linear unsteady measurements agreed with the analytical results. The unsteady pressure measurements at higher offset levels revealed the nonlinear aerodynamic phenomenon of dynamic stall. This confirms that a nonlinear and dynamic model is required to capture the salient characteristics of the lift force on a pitching wing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俯仰机翼非定常气动升力的实验测量和数据处理
本文讨论了在布鲁塞尔自由大学低速风洞中进行俯仰机翼非定常实验的挑战和处理。用于非定常实验的装置由两个独立的装置组成:(a)位置控制装置来控制机翼俯仰角,(b)压力测量装置来测量气动载荷。位置控制设置可以俯仰机翼的频率范围,幅度,和偏移水平。在这项工作中,采用了NACA-0018翼型,展弦比为1.8。位置控制和压力测量装置彼此独立运行,需要先进的信号处理技术来同步俯仰角和升力。此外,压力测量装置的(采样)时钟频率存在一个(没有充分记录的)问题,使用全自动频谱分析技术解决了这个问题。机翼倾斜使用一个简单的谐波正弦激励信号在8个不同的偏移水平(6°和21°之间),固定的幅度变化(std)为6°。在每个偏移水平,机翼在0.1 Hz和2 Hz之间的五个不同频率上倾斜(对应于从0.006到0.125的降低频率k)。所有实验均在固定的基于弦的雷诺数2.85 × 105下进行。操作参数的选择需要考虑机翼的线性和非线性特性。线性非定常测量结果与分析结果一致。高偏置水平的非定常压力测量揭示了动力失速的非线性气动现象。这证实了需要一个非线性和动态模型来捕捉俯仰翼上升力的显著特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Study of Seating Suspension System Vibration Isolation Using a Hybrid Method of an Artificial Neural Network and Response Surface Modelling Evaluating Contact-Less Sensing and Fault Diagnosis Characteristics in Vibrating Thin Cantilever Beams with a MetGlas® 2826MB Ribbon A Testbench for Measuring the Dynamic Force-Displacement Characteristics of Shockmounts Study on Fluid–Structure Interaction of a Camber Morphing Wing Study on Lateral Vibration of Tail Coach for High-Speed Train under Unsteady Aerodynamic Loads
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1