{"title":"Orthotic intervention following stroke: a survey of physiotherapist, occupational therapist and orthotist practice and views in the UK","authors":"Miriam R Golding-Day, M. Walker, P. Whitehead","doi":"10.12968/ijtr.2021.0177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aims Orthoses are often used to promote mobility and rehabilitation for patients in the UK after a stroke. The perspective of stroke therapists in the UK is an important factor determining current practice and orthotic provision. The purpose of this study was to investigate the views of orthotists, physiotherapists and occupational therapists on the delivery mechanisms and relationships that influence orthoses intervention and provision for patients with stroke in the UK. Methods A UK-based online survey was conducted. Participants were stroke therapy clinicians within acute and community settings, recruited through their membership of the British Association of Prosthetists and Orthotists, the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists Interested in Neurology, and the Royal Collage of Occupational Therapists—Specialist Section for Neurological Practice. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. Results A total of 305 questionnaires were completed (64 orthotists, 131 physiotherapists, 110 occupational therapists). Some 67% (n=190) of respondents identified the optimal timing for initial orthotic assessment as within the first days following a stroke or before discharge from hospital. Waiting times and operational barriers to orthoses provision were perceived to have a negative impact on patients’ rehabilitation. A closer working relationship between orthotists and the stroke rehabilitation team is desirable. Conclusions The survey found that the use of orthoses and orthotic specialist input are perceived to play an important role within the stroke rehabilitation pathway. Further evaluative research is warranted to explore the optimal timing and benefits, and the orthotist's role within the stroke rehabilitation team.","PeriodicalId":46562,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2021.0177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Background/Aims Orthoses are often used to promote mobility and rehabilitation for patients in the UK after a stroke. The perspective of stroke therapists in the UK is an important factor determining current practice and orthotic provision. The purpose of this study was to investigate the views of orthotists, physiotherapists and occupational therapists on the delivery mechanisms and relationships that influence orthoses intervention and provision for patients with stroke in the UK. Methods A UK-based online survey was conducted. Participants were stroke therapy clinicians within acute and community settings, recruited through their membership of the British Association of Prosthetists and Orthotists, the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists Interested in Neurology, and the Royal Collage of Occupational Therapists—Specialist Section for Neurological Practice. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. Results A total of 305 questionnaires were completed (64 orthotists, 131 physiotherapists, 110 occupational therapists). Some 67% (n=190) of respondents identified the optimal timing for initial orthotic assessment as within the first days following a stroke or before discharge from hospital. Waiting times and operational barriers to orthoses provision were perceived to have a negative impact on patients’ rehabilitation. A closer working relationship between orthotists and the stroke rehabilitation team is desirable. Conclusions The survey found that the use of orthoses and orthotic specialist input are perceived to play an important role within the stroke rehabilitation pathway. Further evaluative research is warranted to explore the optimal timing and benefits, and the orthotist's role within the stroke rehabilitation team.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation (IJTR) publishes original research, providing a platform for the latest key research findings in therapy and rehabilitation. Review and analysis articles are invited internationally to enable the sharing of practices and developments worldwide, and to raise awareness of different cultural influences in health care. IJTR provides an interdisciplinary approach to therapy and rehabilitation by: -Providing a well-referenced source of information to all professionals involved in therapy and rehabilitation worldwide, including occupational therapists, physiotherapists, chiropodists and podiatrists, radiographers, speech and language therapists and orthoptists -Providing a peer-reviewed source of original research and information presented in an accessible, informative and professional medium -Providing a forum for the discussion of new ideas, information and issues relating to therapy and rehabilitation -Creating an awareness of the national and international issues affecting professionals involved in therapy and rehabilitation -Encouraging collaboration and sharing of new ideas between professions worldwide