Failing to Create Revolutionaries: Polish POWs in Soviet Captivity, 1920–21

IF 0.2 2区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY Revolutionary Russia Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/09546545.2023.2167686
P. Whitewood
{"title":"Failing to Create Revolutionaries: Polish POWs in Soviet Captivity, 1920–21","authors":"P. Whitewood","doi":"10.1080/09546545.2023.2167686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the Bolshevik Party’s efforts to radicalize tens of thousands of Polish prisoners of war (POWs) held in makeshift prison camps across Soviet Russia in the aftermath of the Soviet-Polish War of 1919−20. The end goal was to create a new cadre of Polish revolutionaries to agitate for revolutionary change on repatriation. These propaganda efforts were almost entirely undermined by a series of everyday problems from rudimentary camp living conditions and violence against prisoners to disease and ineffective leadership by Soviet institutions. This article will show, however, that as part of these efforts, the Bolsheviks committed to safeguarding POW welfare, mirroring international standards set by the Hague conventions, even if this was primarily designed to better cultivate revolutionaries and was rarely met in practice. In a comparative sense, therefore, the everyday lives of Polish POWs and their management by Soviet authorities did not markedly differ from the POW experience across Europe, where other governments likewise made claims about safeguarding welfare and often failed to deliver. Contrary to existing interpretations of early Soviet POW camps, which present these as unique stepping-stones to the future Stalinist GULAG, this article shows stronger continuities with past practices.","PeriodicalId":42121,"journal":{"name":"Revolutionary Russia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revolutionary Russia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546545.2023.2167686","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the Bolshevik Party’s efforts to radicalize tens of thousands of Polish prisoners of war (POWs) held in makeshift prison camps across Soviet Russia in the aftermath of the Soviet-Polish War of 1919−20. The end goal was to create a new cadre of Polish revolutionaries to agitate for revolutionary change on repatriation. These propaganda efforts were almost entirely undermined by a series of everyday problems from rudimentary camp living conditions and violence against prisoners to disease and ineffective leadership by Soviet institutions. This article will show, however, that as part of these efforts, the Bolsheviks committed to safeguarding POW welfare, mirroring international standards set by the Hague conventions, even if this was primarily designed to better cultivate revolutionaries and was rarely met in practice. In a comparative sense, therefore, the everyday lives of Polish POWs and their management by Soviet authorities did not markedly differ from the POW experience across Europe, where other governments likewise made claims about safeguarding welfare and often failed to deliver. Contrary to existing interpretations of early Soviet POW camps, which present these as unique stepping-stones to the future Stalinist GULAG, this article shows stronger continuities with past practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未能创造革命者:1920 - 1921年被苏联囚禁的波兰战俘
本文考察了1919 - 1920年苏波战争后,布尔什维克党在苏俄各地的临时战俘营中对数万名波兰战俘进行激进化的努力。最终目标是建立一支新的波兰革命者骨干队伍,在遣返问题上鼓动革命变革。这些宣传努力几乎完全被一系列日常问题所破坏,从简陋的营地生活条件和对囚犯的暴力,到疾病和苏联机构的无效领导。然而,本文将表明,作为这些努力的一部分,布尔什维克承诺保障战俘的福利,反映海牙公约制定的国际标准,即使这主要是为了更好地培养革命者,在实践中很少得到满足。因此,在比较意义上,波兰战俘的日常生活以及苏联当局对他们的管理与整个欧洲的战俘经历并没有明显的不同,其他国家的政府也同样声称要保障福利,但往往未能兑现。与现有的对早期苏联战俘营的解释相反,这种解释将这些战俘营视为通往未来斯大林主义古拉格的独特垫脚石,这篇文章显示了与过去实践的更强的连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
A Re-Examination of Russian Harvest Statistics for the End of the Nineteenth Century From Self-determination to Secession? The Bolsheviks and National Self-determination, 1914–1924 Islamic Leadership and the State in Eurasia Russian Pogroms and Jewish Revolution, 1905. Class, Ethnicity, Autocracy in the First Russian Revolution Foreign Business and Revolution: The British Engineering Company of Russia and Siberia, 1918–1921
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1